An amazing speech. Well said.

bitchute

This speech goes for 4 minutes 3 seconds by a well spoken woman.

I love it when a speech is well done and is truthful. I think this speech is truthful.

I recommend give it a listen and see if you agree.

Best Regards,
DaRage

a reply to: DaRAGE

Thanks for sharing that. Anyone who may specifically disagree with any of this is no friend of yours, mine or humanity. They are shills, automatons, sycophants and the willfully ignorant.

They think they are woke, when in all actuality, they are quite comatose and intellectually neutered. The educational system has hijacked and decimated our children's destiny's. Like she mentioned, "there's nothing organic about any of it". It's a complete cultural shift using our children as fodder.

This is an extensive article with sources and links galore concerning an "American Domestic Bioterrorism Program" that has been operating for decades. It was an added link in another thread by another member to which I apologize for having forgot the members name, but here's the link: bailiwicknews.substack.com...

a reply to: DaRAGE

Good find! No idea who she was, but she mmade sense as well as looked rather alluring.

originally posted by: SprocketUK
a reply to: DaRAGE

Good find! No idea who she was, but she mmade sense as well as looked rather alluring.

Agreed. I wached this just before it was posted.

Shame there is no more info, but KUDOS for the words she spoke and how much truth they contain.

originally posted by: SprocketUK
a reply to: DaRAGE

Good find! No idea who she was, but she mmade sense as well as looked rather alluring.

Her name is Laura Aboli

Strong Words

Found on YouTube as well

originally posted by: TzarChasm

originally posted by: SprocketUK
a reply to: DaRAGE

Good find! No idea who she was, but she mmade sense as well as looked rather alluring.

Her name is Laura Aboli

Thanks I'm just off to ask Mr Google about her

Found a dif video of her speaking ...also good

Laura Aboli: Changing the World One Person at a Time - LINK - LINK2



Who is Laura Aboli? - LINK

originally posted by: tarantulabite1
Laura Aboli: Changing the World One Person at a Time

Hope she picks me next.

a reply to: DaRAGE

I'm sure she believes the doom-porn.

But a very few people being confused about their sexuality (and they will never be a majority in the population) are not going to end the human race.

Men and women are just not going to stop having sex, parenting children, and forming families.

I see this speech as 'fake moralism' in that it actually serves as motivational hate speech against minority opinions.

Take a look at the propagandas of tyrannical systems such as the 'morality policing' of the Taliban, or the ethnic segregations of apartheid, and the vilification of minorities by the Nazi regime. We have historical precedent of where this kind of 'speech' leads.

There is no way that acceptance of minorities will end mankind.

... and the only way to 'suppress' those minority voices would be some sort of tyrannical oppression to try and force them to conform, and that IS inhuman.

originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: DaRAGE

I'm sure she believes the doom-porn.

But a very few people being confused about their sexuality (and they will never be a majority in the population) are not going to end the human race.

Men and women are just not going to stop having sex, parenting children, and forming families.

I see this speech as 'fake moralism' in that it actually serves as motivational hate speech against minority opinions.

Take a look at the propagandas of tyrannical systems such as the 'morality policing' of the Taliban, or the ethnic segregations of apartheid, and the vilification of minorities by the Nazi regime. We have historical precedent of where this kind of 'speech' leads.

There is no way that acceptance of minorities will end mankind.

... and the only way to 'suppress' those minority voices would be some sort of tyrannical oppression to try and force them to conform, and that IS inhuman.

If it is virtue-signaling and hate-speech(lol) to speak out about a purported conspiracy to PSYOP human society into accepting opinions over fact about what humanity is, then you might as well just keep those terms in your pocket for anything you disagree with, such as how many holes a donut should have to distinguish it from a pastry.



Edit2:Add:™

I must add a disclaimer here, that I am not at all speaking to the multitudinous variations of arguments from all 8.1 billion perspectives(that we know of....DUNDUNDUN!) towards just what it means to be a human being stuck in a beautiful and tragic experience on the beautiful and tragic Planet Earth of Sol.

originally posted by: BiothermalReactor

originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: DaRAGE

I'm sure she believes the doom-porn.

But a very few people being confused about their sexuality (and they will never be a majority in the population) are not going to end the human race.

Men and women are just not going to stop having sex, parenting children, and forming families.

I see this speech as 'fake moralism' in that it actually serves as motivational hate speech against minority opinions.

Take a look at the propagandas of tyrannical systems such as the 'morality policing' of the Taliban, or the ethnic segregations of apartheid, and the vilification of minorities by the Nazi regime. We have historical precedent of where this kind of 'speech' leads.

There is no way that acceptance of minorities will end mankind.

... and the only way to 'suppress' those minority voices would be some sort of tyrannical oppression to try and force them to conform, and that IS inhuman.

If it is virtue-signaling and hate-speech(lol) to speak out about a purported conspiracy to PSYOP human society into accepting opinions over fact about what humanity is, then you might as well just keep those terms in your pocket for anything you disagree with, such as how many holes a donut should have to distinguish it from a pastry.

Edit2:Add:™

I must add a disclaimer here, that I am not at all speaking to the multitudinous variations of arguments from all 8.1 billion perspectives(that we know of....DUNDUNDUN!) towards just what it means to be a human being stuck in a beautiful and tragic experience on the beautiful and tragic Planet Earth of Sol.

She started with "The final goal is to eradicate humanity as we know it", and used words throughout such as "extinction", and then she talked about all sorts of things, none of which are either capable, or likely, to end humanity as we know it.

She talked of "the destruction of the nuclear family", and that isn't going to happen, and especially it isn't going to happen by merely allowing some other options to exist.

She talked of "the eradication of God and spirituality" which although some parts of society are becoming more secular, others aren't, and just 2,000 years ago, there were no such things as Christians, or JW's, or Mormons, or Muslims, or UFO cults, or Scientologists, or really most of the beliefs that are popular at the moment. And yet, the human race survived all of that.

She spoke of "megacities" as being something that was contributing to the extinction of mankind, I mean, WTF?

She spoke of "toxic foods" at a time when foods are safer, and diet is analyzed more closely, that any previous time in human history!

She spoke of "engineered crisis", like as if we don't have enough crises that just happen all the time, and have happened all through history.

She spoke of social media replacing real interaction, and that's as rational as suggesting printed books will end individual human thought, or that Blockbuster will replace TV broadcasts and people going to the movies.

And she included "taxation" too. LOL that will really end the human race (from which the taxation is gathered). LOL.

And "wars, mass migration, stress, anxiety, depression, drugs and alcohol" because, you know, bad!

And finally, "moral relativism". Look at all the bodies strewn through history who died of moral relativism. Oh, the humanity!!!!



Honestly, the whole speech was irrational emotional appeal, formulated to fit the Qtarded demographic.

Have a look at the titles of the articles that Laura Aboli publishes and see if you can determine what her beliefs are?

originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: BiothermalReactor
originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: DaRAGE

You make too many rebuttals without any sources.

Much of the food available for purchse to USA peoples are indeed toxic, if you look at the comorbidity roster.

She is explicitly referring to a "TOP DOWN" imposition on accepting that peoples opinions weigh far greater than the facts that we uncover about the universe as a whole.

You know...a conspiracy?

I honestly don't know how THE FACT, that she was referring to a conspiracy, could be lost on anyone with any credibility.


Edit2Add:™

"She spoke of social media replacing real interaction, and that's as rational as suggesting printed books will end individual human thought, or that Blockbuster will replace TV broadcasts and people going to the movies."

It sure is a challenge carrying around a Blockbuster in your pocket with 24/7 access from anywhere in the world.

Edit2AlsoAdd:™

Would you please point us to what, in the link you provided, is so fallacious and reprehensible?

I'm sure it would make a worthy thread of well-researched and civilized dissection.

a reply to: DaRAGE

To a certain extent it's truthful. Most people indeed consume the ideas propagated by their society mindlessly. That makes their vision of reality distorted. However, it's not something that has been happening just recently. People could always be brainwashed into believing anything. Even in ancient Rome, bread and circuses were enough to lull the populace into sleep and make them forget about tyranny.

originally posted by: VariedcodeSole
a reply to: DaRAGE

Thanks for sharing that. Anyone who may specifically disagree with any of this is no friend of yours, mine or humanity. They are shills, automatons, sycophants and the willfully ignorant.

They think they are woke, when in all actuality, they are quite comatose and intellectually neutered. The educational system has hijacked and decimated our children's destiny's. Like she mentioned, "there's nothing organic about any of it". It's a complete cultural shift using our children as fodder.

I totally agree with you assessment of the topic content, but I do most certainly disagree if you do not include the oft unrepresented innocently ignorant.

I very much believe it is imperative we give the innocently ignorant, who are are all living peaceful(hopefully) ordinary lives in ordinary neighborhoods, being busy as hell taking care of three devious children as best as they possibly know how, and have NO TIME to research independently, or even have an adequate skill of logic and reason in order to have suspicions aroused about seemingly nonconnected events that might shed new light on one's current understanding of the geo-economical-ideological game JOSHUA-style events, a fair and honest representation and distinction so as not to be lumped in with the others you mentioned, who are not innocent, at all.

Edit to add: it's a small world, after all

originally posted by: BiothermalReactor

originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: BiothermalReactor
originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: DaRAGE

You make too many rebuttals without any sources.

And Laura Aboli (and you) have provided any sources?

However, I did make some specific references to known historical events and I believe I drew rational conclusions in my posts in this thread - neither Aboli (nor you) have gone even that far.

Much of the food available for purchase to USA peoples are indeed toxic with the comorbidity roster.

Ah, the "comorbidity roster", can you please provide a link to that? I could make better informed purchase decisions if I had that.

She is explicitly referring to a "TOP DOWN" imposition on accepting that peoples opinions weigh far greater than the facts that we uncover about the universe as a whole.

Oh, I see, it was "them", you know, those guys "at the top". How specific and clear.

I suppose you mean Donald Trump and his acolytes, who was, you have to admit, the one at 'the top of the top' when all these forces were aligning, you know in the years 2017-2020.

You know...a conspiracy?

Alleged conspiracy.

I honestly don't know how that fact could be lost on anyone.

Ditto.

Edit2Add:™

"She spoke of social media replacing real interaction, and that's as rational as suggesting printed books will end individual human thought, or that Blockbuster will replace TV broadcasts and people going to the movies."

It sure is a challenge carrying around a Blockbuster in your pocket with 24/7 access from anywhere in the world.

Wouldn't having such a communication device on your person be greater interpersonal interaction, not less?



But, who do you think was doing all those posts, reposts, and likes on social media?

And did it actually stop any meetings, any concerts, any restaurant dates, any church services, any political debates and any protests, & etc? Nope.

It still all happened, and is still happening (for those that live outside of mom's basement).

originally posted by: BiothermalReactor

originally posted by: VariedcodeSole
a reply to: DaRAGE

Thanks for sharing that. Anyone who may specifically disagree with any of this is no friend of yours, mine or humanity. They are shills, automatons, sycophants and the willfully ignorant.

They think they are woke, when in all actuality, they are quite comatose and intellectually neutered. The educational system has hijacked and decimated our children's destiny's. Like she mentioned, "there's nothing organic about any of it". It's a complete cultural shift using our children as fodder.

I totally agree with you assessment of the topic content, but I do most certainly disagree if you do not include the oft unrepresented innocently ignorant.

I very much believe it is imperative we give the innocently ignorant, who are are all living peaceful(hopefully) ordinary lives in ordinary neighborhoods, being busy as hell taking care of three devious children as best as they possibly know how, and have NO TIME to research independently,

What on them interwebz? on that socyial media?



Apparently, according to Ms Aboli, all people are exclusively stuck to their online existence, 24x7 - if I follow the argument - so, they would, in fact, have all the time in the world to 'look things up', wouldn't they?

or even have an adequate skill of logic and reason in order to have suspicions aroused about seemingly nonconnected events that might shed new light on one's current understanding of the geo-economical-ideological game JOSHUA-style events, a fair and honest representation and distinction so as not to be lumped in with the others you mentioned, who are not innocent, at all.

Clearly, it is them lizzid people to blame. LOL.



You see, you do not seem to have considered the case of someone who rejects an alleged conspiracy theory because it is silly and rationally inconsistent, because that would be denying that it is true. And your every evaluation of things is entirely dependent upon the belief that the conspiracy theory must be true.

a reply to: DaRAGE

Thanks for this link.

I have shared it.

What the…a reply to: DaRAGE