Tens of Thousands Attend pro-Palestinian Rally in Washington DC

a reply to: Threadbarer


easy "90%" of the population outnumber the the 10%, what's that 9 to 1?
if they don't at least hold protests against hamas and their practices their just letting them run over them, that's how. they know that when hamas hits Israel, that Israel gonna hit them back harder and that they stand a chance of being killed due to them hiding among the "90%".

the "90%" wouldn't be puttin up with that # if they didn't at least in part support hamas.

originally posted by: SprocketUK

originally posted by: Spiramirabilis
a reply to: SprocketUK

which as I showed in the post you replied to is completely wrong.

Opinions vary. Words mean different things to different people at different times

www.aljazeera.com...

You showed me only what you believe

and you just proved my point about you being no different to the white power nutters trying to justify the words they shout out.

LOL

I believe at this point thats the most honest reply you deserve

You understand what I'm saying is appropriate. Words mean different things to different people at different times

You see them as violent? That proves nothing

It explains everything about this country right now

originally posted by: Spiramirabilis

originally posted by: SprocketUK

originally posted by: Spiramirabilis
a reply to: SprocketUK

which as I showed in the post you replied to is completely wrong.

Opinions vary. Words mean different things to different people at different times

www.aljazeera.com...

You showed me only what you believe

and you just proved my point about you being no different to the white power nutters trying to justify the words they shout out.

LOL

I believe at this point thats the most honest reply you deserve

You understand what I'm saying is appropriate. Words mean different things to different people at different times

You see them as violent? That proves nothing

It explains everything about this country right now

and you had to use an al jazeera page to try and defend that river to the sea tosh.


From the guardian, a paper broadly sympathetic to the Palestinian cause. “Hamas rejects any alternative to the full and complete liberation of Palestine, from the river to the sea,” says the organisation’s 2017 constitution.
li nky

Palestinians will not reject Hamas on their own.
They are complicit.

a reply to: SprocketUK
Did you read your own link?

🙂

a reply to: marg6043

What's the solution? War? Don't worry, daddy Trump will get you what you clearly want, a jihad against the jihad. The Middle East will be a pile of rubble and you'll dance on top of the corpses with him. All Muslims will "get what they deserve", right?

originally posted by: 31331Dos
a reply to: marg6043

What's the solution? War? Don't worry, daddy Trump will get you what you clearly want, a jihad against the jihad. The Middle East will be a pile of rubble and you'll dance on top of the corpses with him.

Glad you agree.

originally posted by: Spiramirabilis
You're not being honest Flyers

What part of this is incorrect?

"From the River to the Sea .... '
'Long Live Intifada ...'
'Allah Akbar ....'

From the River to the Sea - the chant used to call for the destruction of Israel and the death of the Jews.

Long live intifada - the chant used to recall the violence when thousands of people were murdered in the name of destruction of Israel and death of the Jews.

Allah Akbar - the chant used by muslim terrorists around the world when they slaughter innocent people.

NONE OF IT IS INCORRECT. That is what these 'peaceful' protestors were chanting and that's what those chants mean. Like I said, it calls for the violent and deathly end to Israel. And if those protestors don't want that to happen, then they shouldn't be chanting the slogans that call for it.

That's honest. That's brutally honest. Nothing dishonest about it.

originally posted by: Spiramirabilis
a reply to: FlyersFan

You're not being honest Flyers

You're also not thinking

The Palestinians are stuck with Hamas. For now

Israel, for the time being - is stuck with Likud

Innocent people will be trampled under the feet of people with God on their side

You can play it as ignorant as you want, but many in the world can see what's what

I think many in the world refuse (by choice or by bias or by emotional trauma) to see the truth of what is really going on not only between these two factions, but with all the other political players which are involved in different ways. What does Israel want?

a reply to: AlongCameaSpider

So you've admitted defeat, you no longer care about whether Trump is peaceful, you want him to go in and glass everything. How easily you bend to the warmongers' will, they've got your mind so wrapped around their finger that you'll go wherever they point.

Do you plan on fighting in the war or are you some coward that will be fighting from his keyboard while demanding others do the real fighting for you?

The latter, I already know. Cowards are the only ones who pray for a war because they know they won't be the ones dying in it. You're a coward and we both know it. You're doing daddy Trump proud, he wouldn't have it any other way, a mindless robotic drone that just follows the code and who doesn't think past your marching orders. He's taught you well.

Pretty pathetic honestly.

originally posted by: FlyersFan

originally posted by: Spiramirabilis
You're not being honest Flyers

What part of this is incorrect?

"From the River to the Sea .... '
'Long Live Intifada ...'
'Allah Akbar ....'

From the River to the Sea - the chant used to call for the destruction of Israel and the death of the Jews.

Long live intifada - the chant used to recall the violence when thousands of people were murdered in the name of destruction of Israel and death of the Jews.

Allah Akbar - the chant used by muslim terrorists around the world when they slaughter innocent people.

NONE OF IT IS INCORRECT. That is what these 'peaceful' protestors were chanting and that's what those chants mean. Like I said, it calls for the violent and deathly end to Israel. And if those protestors don't want that to happen, then they shouldn't be chanting the slogans that call for it.

That's honest. That's brutally honest. Nothing dishonest about it.

Hamas is in negotiations indirectly through Qatar, this is what they want:

Ultimately, Hamas believes international pressure for Israel to end the siege, as civilian casualties mount, could force a ceasefire and a negotiated settlement that would see the militant group emerge with a tangible concession such as the release of thousands of Palestinian prisoners in exchange for Israeli hostages, the sources said.

The group has made it clear to the U.S. and Israel at indirect, Qatar-mediated hostage negotiations that it wants to force such a prisoner release in exchange for hostages, according to four Hamas officials, a regional official and a person familiar with the White House's thinking.

Longer term, Hamas has said it wants to end Israel's 17-year blockade of Gaza, as well as to halt Israeli settlement expansion and what Palestinians see as heavy-handed actions by Israeli security forces at the al-Aqsa mosque, the most sacred Muslim shrine in Jerusalem.

www.reuters.com...#:~:text=Longer%20term%2C%20Hamas%20has%20said,sacred%20 Muslim%20shrine%20in%20Jerusalem.

originally posted by: Spiramirabilis
a reply to: SprocketUK
Did you read your own link?

🙂

Where did you think I got the quote from?

a reply to: FlyersFan

I believe you're not willing to acknowledge that words have different meanings to different people at different times

You need to sell this. Even if only to yourself

I believe you are unwilling to hear the words any other way, and that you can't allow yourself to hear or see anything that might make the Palestinians appear human or deserving of rights

It's intellectually dishonest

Have you heard any of the words coming out of Israel? Not even recently, not even now, but coming out of the past?

Sorry Flyers. It is what it is. I think you and I have gone as far as we're going to get

But I'm always waiting to be surprised

originally posted by: Spiramirabilis
a reply to: FlyersFan

I believe you're not willing to acknowledge that words have different meanings to different people at different times

You need to sell this. Even if only to yourself

I believe you are unwilling to hear the words any other way, and that you can't allow yourself to hear or see anything that might make the Palestinians appear human or deserving of rights

It's intellectually dishonest

Have you heard any of the words coming out of Israel? Not even recently, not even now, but coming out of the past?

Sorry Flyers. It is what it is. I think you and I have gone as far as we're going to get

But I'm always waiting to be surprised

You should hold up a mirror to that post

a reply to: quintessentone

I agree

What does Israel want? It wants to survive

The world turned a blind eye to antisemitism for far too long, until it was confronted with the nightmare of the Holocaust

So much of the world then gave Israel a big stick and permission to use it any way they wanted. Then it hid it's face in shame and pretended not to see the Palestinians the same way it pretended not to see the Jews earlier on

None if this is even ironic. It's human nature. People deserve human rights, and all humans want to survive

Its anyone's guess how much uglier this gets. I always hope that this sort of thing can bring about positive change

I'm probably an idiot

originally posted by: kwaka
What is funding it is a better question to get those crowds. Locking 2 Million people in a small area and systemically bombing them looks like a motive.

But it looks like Israel needs better weapons because they seem to only be able to kill less than 2 people per mass attack. I mean if they are trying to kill people they are not doing a very good job at it.

a reply to: FlyersFan

nymag.com...

Here is a simple proposition: You can oppose antisemitism without condoning hatred of Muslims or Arabs. Likewise, you can oppose bias against Muslims and Arabs without condoning antisemitism

***

For you Flyers

I'm pretty sure Jesus isn't taking sides

originally posted by: WingDingLuey
Turkey recalls envoy to Israel, 'writes off' Netanyahu

Turkey has a few ongoing wars as we speak, but I guess it is OK for them, and zero oversite as to how many 10,000s Kurds they have killed and 100K+ imprisoned. It's all good as they fight in Syria, Libya, and northern Iraq.

originally posted by: quintessentone
Hamas is in negotiations indirectly through Qatar, this is what they want:

So what? What I said was this about the topic of this thread and it's correct-

What part of this is incorrect?

"From the River to the Sea .... '
'Long Live Intifada ...'
'Allah Akbar ....'

From the River to the Sea - the chant used to call for the destruction of Israel and the death of the Jews.

Long live intifada - the chant used to recall the violence when thousands of people were murdered in the name of destruction of Israel and death of the Jews.

Allah Akbar - the chant used by muslim terrorists around the world when they slaughter innocent people.

NONE OF IT IS INCORRECT. That is what these 'peaceful' protestors were chanting and that's what those chants mean. Like I said, it calls for the violent and deathly end to Israel. And if those protestors don't want that to happen, then they shouldn't be chanting the slogans that call for it.

originally posted by: Spiramirabilis
For you Flyers
I'm pretty sure Jesus isn't taking sides

I have never brought Jesus into it. So not sure why you are.
And your post is irrelevant to what I said. My post is accurate -

What part of this is incorrect?

"From the River to the Sea .... '
'Long Live Intifada ...'
'Allah Akbar ....'

From the River to the Sea - the chant used to call for the destruction of Israel and the death of the Jews.

Long live intifada - the chant used to recall the violence when thousands of people were murdered in the name of destruction of Israel and death of the Jews.

Allah Akbar - the chant used by muslim terrorists around the world when they slaughter innocent people.

NONE OF IT IS INCORRECT. That is what these 'peaceful' protestors were chanting and that's what those chants mean. Like I said, it calls for the violent and deathly end to Israel. And if those protestors don't want that to happen, then they shouldn't be chanting the slogans that call for it.