It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Supreme Court rejects long-shot case to disqualify Trump from 2024 election

page: 2
17
<< 1   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 3 2023 @ 11:03 AM
link   
Woe on the officials of any state who allow Donald Trump to be disqualified there.

😬



posted on Oct, 3 2023 @ 11:06 AM
link   
a reply to: carewemust

Is that a threat?



posted on Oct, 3 2023 @ 11:14 AM
link   
a reply to: Threadbare

Yes, from the voter.



posted on Oct, 3 2023 @ 11:15 AM
link   
a reply to: tanstaafl




Being eligible is.


The right to run for office, is a qualified privilege, in my opinion. It's qualified by local community standards, state statutes and federal laws. There are residency restrictions, citizenship requirements, financial obligations and filing and signature requirements.

This is not the case with the 1st, 2nd, 5th or any of the constitutional amendments.


edit on 3-10-2023 by Sookiechacha because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 3 2023 @ 11:19 AM
link   
a reply to: Sookiechacha

So you think the citizens who protested on 1/6 are enemies of the USA? Way to put it all out there. There is no reason to not allow him on the ballot in any state.

The fact the SCOTUS ruled on this, ruled on the 2000 election but not 2020 also tells us a lot.

The show must go on....



posted on Oct, 3 2023 @ 11:47 AM
link   
a reply to: matafuchs




So you think the citizens who protested on 1/6 are enemies of the USA?


I think the ones convicted of sedition are.



There is no reason to not allow him on the ballot in any state.


Well okay then!



The fact the SCOTUS ruled on this, ruled on the 2000 election but not 2020 also tells us a lot.


SCOTUS ruled on what? They decided not to intervene. Perhaps, when some state actual does deny Trump a place on the state ballot, SCOTUS will get involved. Lord knows, it was their overlords that put this theory out there!



posted on Oct, 3 2023 @ 01:21 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: tanstaafl
The right to run for office, is a qualified privilege, in my opinion.

Yes, and we all know what opinions are like... and in this case, where yours comes from.



posted on Oct, 3 2023 @ 02:00 PM
link   
a reply to: Sookiechacha




And, it seems that any 'ole state AG or state SOS can accuse Trump of insurrection, of at the very least, of giving aide and confort to the enemies of the USA, and refuse to allow Trump's name on the ballot.


Is that what you gleaned from the SCOTUS refusing to hear the case?

What you suggest is to skip due process to strip an American citizen of their rights....



posted on Oct, 3 2023 @ 02:23 PM
link   
a reply to: JinMI

Sure. Then, Trump could sue in the lower courts and petition SCOTUS to challenge the decision.



posted on Oct, 3 2023 @ 02:24 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: JinMI

Sure. Then, Trump could sue in the lower courts and petition SCOTUS to challenge the decision.


And that is exactly the problem.



posted on Oct, 3 2023 @ 08:59 PM
link   
a reply to: Sookiechacha

that has nothing to do with this case



posted on Oct, 11 2023 @ 04:52 PM
link   

originally posted by: WingDingLuey
a reply to: Sookiechacha

that has nothing to do with this case


Only in regards to due process.


That part they simply cannot get around.



new topics

    top topics



     
    17
    << 1   >>

    log in

    join