It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Threadbare
a reply to: DBCowboy
So you're outraged over something that hasn't happened?
originally posted by: network dude
a reply to: DAVID64
if they stopped the progress of government, then they did the exact same thing. .....
originally posted by: Stopstealingmycountry
a reply to: DAVID64
The dynamics of one vs the other are vastly different. But if hippies sitting on the floor till being arrested is the same as storming the capital building and attacking officers during a closed session then sure.
Unfortunately it is not. But hey you do you and compare the two......
originally posted by: Threadbare
a reply to: DBCowboy
And as of right now it's entirely baseless. They broke the law and were arrested. There's not really anything else to be said right now.
If the prosecutor refuses to bring charges then you might have grounds be upset. But that's not something that has happened at this point. So you're just being outraged to be outraged.
originally posted by: Stopstealingmycountry
a reply to: DBCowboy
So you support the DOJ in their actions against the J6 protest that turned into a mob correct?
Because if you want these hippies to have the book thrown at them then you must also want the same for the J6 shenanigans.
Please do enlighten us on your perspective on the two separate matters and how they differ or are similar.
originally posted by: Stopstealingmycountry
a reply to: DBCowboy
As do I but these two situations are completely different though. But with that said both situations involve people breaking the law to different degrees.
It is a pipe dream to get what you and I wish to happen. And we can debate the issues surrounding both till our eyes bleed but the end result is out of our hands.