Can the pentagon claim that UAP sightings are just drones?

The testimonies of the recent UFO hearing has gained allot of attention from the media worldwide. The fact that pilots are ordered to remain quiet about these UAP sightings is a clear indication these UAPs belong to the US government and not from enemy countries.

If it comes to a point where the pentagon is expected to make an official statement/briefing to congress about aliens and UFOs they could easily make the claim that the US military have classified aircrafts that resemble a UAP/UFO but that these aircrafts are just stealth bombers or UAV drones that have the capability to hover or remain stationary in the air and then could also use hypersonic jet propulsion to take off at high speed. This would easily explain the strange maneuvers displayed by these UFOs.

If the US military does indeed have reversed alien anti-gravity technology and want to keep it secret, then to claim they have something like experimental hypersonic drones or bombers would seem like a good excuse to explain sightings seen by navy pilots.

. Wrong post

a reply to: RedPanda94

If they claim it, they'll have to explain it.


Specifically, they'll have to explain the underlying physics they've "discovered" which allows these "drones" to hover motionless against high winds and accelerate from 0 MPH to supersonic speeds without either aerodynamic surfaces or the heat signature of a propulsion system.


Just claiming "We figured out (some sort of) 'anti-gravity' ", isn't going to cut it in academic circles.



Physics, the knowledge-base of the subject, is "Open Sourced".

a reply to: RedPanda94

They claim to be hit by a passenger plane, I guess they can claim whatever...

a reply to: RedPanda94
At this point I think It's unpredictable what those guys there will do , because I've got the feeling that there's a great amount of contradiction going on within the pentagon.

I think to understand that the outcome of the Newyork times article, the release of all the footage and the political mayhem that it was in including covid.

Looks as if they thought that it was a good timing to put this to the test and how the the nation and maybe the world reacted about the topic.

Clearing out the name pronounce to UAP seemed like lowering stigmatisation.

Did they forsee that there would be a witness protection as see today and realized that they could lose the narrative in the near future?

originally posted by: RedPanda94
The testimonies of the recent UFO hearing has gained allot of attention from the media worldwide. The fact that pilots are ordered to remain quiet about these UAP sightings is a clear indication these UAPs belong to the US government and not from enemy countries.

If it comes to a point where the pentagon is expected to make an official statement/briefing to congress about aliens and UFOs they could easily make the claim that the US military have classified aircrafts that resemble a UAP/UFO but that these aircrafts are just stealth bombers or UAV drones that have the capability to hover or remain stationary in the air and then could also use hypersonic jet propulsion to take off at high speed. This would easily explain the strange maneuvers displayed by these UFOs.

If the US military does indeed have reversed alien anti-gravity technology and want to keep it secret, then to claim they have something like experimental hypersonic drones or bombers would seem like a good excuse to explain sightings seen by navy pilots.

Have you entertained the possibility it’s all a false arms race? We know and accept the military and intelligence agencies intentionally create false data, false information, false reports, and are very comfortable and willing to use falsified information towards whatever their goal is.

The forever obscuring of the subject looks to me like more of the same, but hey some folks are convinced they see Nordic aliens or reptilians so why listen to me a rando on some forum…

a reply to: RedPanda94

The pentagon can claim anything they want, if they keep repeating it enough it becomes true without even having to manufacture evidence. Propaganda 101.

a reply to: ITSALIVE

How about a real arms race in a new theatre of war… AI? What if we’re already at war with AI and have been for a very long time?