It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

hearing analysis 3

page: 1
2

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 28 2023 @ 09:38 PM
link   
electric boogaloo? oh nevermind

and so after watching the latest hearing these things stood out to me

1. dg must brief congressional members asap, whether in a scif or wherever, he needs to give them everything for the sake of awareness alone let alone the safety of whistleblowers and witnesses moving forward, im afraid anyone currently trying to keep this secret and attempt to intimidate or silence people who tell the truth or are seeking the truth will be known, so just a heads up there for the short sighted, im afraid some of these people have used national security laws to hide illegal programs?

2. commercial airline pilots and military pilots who want to be transparent with their observations need a platform to give their testimony to and so that it can be shared publicly if they choose, it will help develop patterns and situational awareness that may help air safety

as far as dr sean (cry me a river) kirkpatrick goes he has said some eyebrow raising things such as the mothership probes thing and how aaro is scared of an advanced highly technical species may come in some armada to over take us earthlings (which btw this secret has kept us in the dark to the point we cant even pretend to be ready to defend ourselves so thanks for that) but people are feeling like things go into aaro that never come out almost like a contolled narrative type of thing and thats getting old so yeah

anyway i think setting aside the alien vehicles and alien body recoveries and just show the videos and photos that aatip got see and declassify it and release it to the public and also release the cia ufo files they supposedly have and let us take a look for ourselves and kick the tires so we can see why its classified as secret to be withheld from the public, like why do these people get to see it and we dont? maybe it just might prove something alot of us suspect? i dont know, what do yall think, discuss down below, thanks



posted on Jul, 28 2023 @ 09:54 PM
link   
a reply to: saskwatch

First step, Who is in charge of providing access to the appropriate SCIF('s).

The subcommittee apparently requested a SCIF for the very purpose you referenced, but was denied such access, supposedly by person or persons in the Military and Intelligence communities.

Until that obstacle is cleared, there is not much that can be done, short of taking the offending heads, to move forward.



posted on Jul, 29 2023 @ 12:05 AM
link   
Call Obama to testify.

He has spoken about UFOs very subtlety in public and televised forums.



posted on Jul, 29 2023 @ 12:13 AM
link   

originally posted by: abe froman
Call Obama to testify.

He has spoken about UFOs very subtlety in public and televised forums.


Exhume Hynek….and Friedman….

😊
👽



posted on Jul, 29 2023 @ 12:40 AM
link   
a reply to: Mantiss2021

What Mr. Ogles had to say about a SCIF…


Mr. Chairman, you know, I think I'm the last member to go, but there clearly is a threat to the National Security of the United States of America. As members of Congress, we have a responsibility to maintain oversight and be aware of these activities. So that if appropriate, we take action.

I would encourage the Chairman to demand that we have any and all, but in particular, Mr. Grush, talk to us in a SCIF. And if that access is denied, I will personally volunteer to initiate the Holman Rule against any personnel or any program or any agency that denies access to Congress.


In a snapshot…..

The Holman rule is a rule in the United States House of Representatives that allows amendments to appropriations legislation that would reduce the salary of or fire specific federal employees, or cut a specific program. Versions of the rule were in effect during 1876–1895 and again during 1911–1983.


👽



posted on Jul, 29 2023 @ 12:51 AM
link   

originally posted by: Mantiss2021
a reply to: saskwatch

First step, Who is in charge of providing access to the appropriate SCIF('s).

The subcommittee apparently requested a SCIF for the very purpose you referenced, but was denied such access, supposedly by person or persons in the Military and Intelligence communities.

Until that obstacle is cleared, there is not much that can be done, short of taking the offending heads, to move forward.


There might be action they can take if denied a SCIF hearing.
Time 1:49:35 in the oversight hearing Mr Ogles says "I would encourage the Chairman to demand we have access to talk to Grusch in a SCIF. And if that access is denied I will personally volunteer to initiate the Holman rule against any personnel, or any program, or any agency that denies access to congress"

I'm not exactly sure what the Holman law might do, if anything.



posted on Jul, 29 2023 @ 12:53 AM
link   
a reply to: kangawoo

Did you read the post above yours?

👽



posted on Jul, 29 2023 @ 12:56 AM
link   
a reply to: Ophiuchus1

Lol, no. I was just very slow as I remembered someone said something along those lines in the hearing, and it took me ages to find it and finish my post.



posted on Jul, 29 2023 @ 12:59 AM
link   
a reply to: kangawoo

I’d say that’s…like minds 😉

👽



posted on Jul, 29 2023 @ 01:33 AM
link   
a reply to: Ophiuchus1

In this particular case, I am not sure what, if any, effect the Holman rule would have, as incentive, or even as a threat.

The people and programs being discussed apparently have been operating in the blackest of the black budget programs, with funding diverted, perhaps even illegally, and most certainly, untraceably, for decades.

A point briefly touched upon by one of the subcommittee members, as I recall.

Undoubtedly the "war chests" are full, and easily replenished by multiple channels; some of which might not even be domestic.
edit on 29-7-2023 by Mantiss2021 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 29 2023 @ 01:51 AM
link   
a reply to: Mantiss2021

I’ll go along with the income streams being not only domestic……

I’ve always seen the U.S.’s spread of Democratic Values around the world as a means to rape the world of its financial resources, minerals, etc.

So yeah….black projects could well indeed get funded from abroad activities.

👽



posted on Jul, 29 2023 @ 04:39 AM
link   
a reply to: abe froman

He's busy with the vineyard stuff. 😆😆



posted on Jul, 29 2023 @ 08:22 AM
link   

originally posted by: Ophiuchus1

originally posted by: abe froman
Call Obama to testify.

He has spoken about UFOs very subtlety in public and televised forums.


Exhume Hynek….and Friedman….

😊
👽


Ha, I thought about Friedman the other day...

Starting at the beginning, in an earlier thread posted a Burchett interview video, and the chairman even mentioned it briefly at the hearing.

How is it that something that occurred for 50-70 years still can't be released because of national security?

Burchett basically said all the craft and the subsequent biological matter was collected early on when we first started using radar. He hasn't seen any indication the DoD has any recent craft.



new topics

top topics



 
2

log in

join