It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Mantiss2021
a reply to: FlyInTheOintment
Back in the early 1990's I was part of an amateur team which undertook the design and construction of what to be the first non-governmentally backed rocket launch to space (defined, at that time by the Von Karman line).
Members of that team went on to design what is the highest flying dirigible on record at 95,085 FT, in October of 2011.
In fact, the recent "Chinese Spy Balloon" is reported to have incorporated design features use by that record-setting vehicle.
As I have posted previously, in other threads, it is entirely possible, and even relatively inexpensive to devise, build, fly, and prove, for oneself that the Earth is, in fact, not flat. A fact that has been known since the ancient Greece.
originally posted by: FlyInTheOintment
a reply to: Mantiss2021
And yet long range photography totally debunks the assertion that the Earth possesses curvature, because photos of targets over 480km distant from the observation point have been seen clearly, a fact which is impossible if we indeed live on a spherical planet. If we lived on a spherical planet, those photographs simply couldn't exist.
Engineers do not account for Earth curvature when laying railway line or excavating canals, pilots do not have to continually nose down the aircraft to avoid flying off into 'space', water always finds & maintains its level & indeed many of the photos I allude to here & have incorporated in the thread which is linked in the OP demonstrate plane views of water over vast distances, which would be impossible to view if we lived on a spherical planet.
The guy who first entered the stratosphere, Auguste Piccard, stated that the Earth was flat, with an upturned edge running around it as a rim enclosing the oceans - Antarctica. The disinformation campaign alleging that we live on a spherical planet went into overdrive shortly after he made those initial observations, and after the expeditions of Admiral Byrd, as well as stratospheric testing of the firmament limitations of our world with Operation Fishbowl & similar.
The reason the fraud has been perpetrated is rooted in sinister occult shenanigans, NOT in true science. The world's people have been consistently duped for over ninety years with one fake after another, all done in the hopes of building up a wave of 'irrefutable' evidence that the Earth is a spherical planet & not a flat planar geologic realm enclosed in some sort of projection/singularity illusion. Sadly, most of the world's people believe the deceptions that are perpetrated by NASA & other space agencies, they cannot see the proper evidence laid out if one knows how to do the research.
Oh dear.
a reply to: FlyInTheOintment
And yet long range photography totally debunks the assertion that the Earth possesses curvature, because photos of targets over 480km distant from the observation point have been seen clearly, a fact which is impossible if we indeed live on a spherical planet. If we lived on a spherical planet, those photographs simply couldn't exist.
a reply to: FlyInTheOintment
I believe it's a possibility. It was also an opportunity to make the US leadership look ridiculous by getting their knickers in a twist about a seemingly non-threatening balloon, blasting it out of the sky using missiles from fast jets, when an air rifle would have done the trick.
originally posted by: FlyInTheOintment
because photos of targets over 480km distant from the observation point have been seen clearly, a fact which is impossible if we indeed live on a spherical planet.
I thought there was more concern about communication signals collected than about visual imagery with the Chinese spy satellite? Which reminds me that of the hundreds of false conspiracy theories on ATS, there was one true conspiracy theory that the reasons the solar observatory was shut down and flooded with federal agents was because of something similar except on an observatory on a mountain instead of a balloon. Probably a chinese spy got access to the observatory and installed eavesdropping antennae and equipment, and they removed all that stuff and made up some obviously fake excuse for why they raided the observatory, about the janitor looking at dirty pictures. They don't need a team of government agents to shut down the observatory to deal with something like that.
originally posted by: OneBigMonkeyToo
Not NASA, and not trolling as such, but my opinion is that it wasn't so much to gather information about America (or wherever else that balloon ended up) - there are plenty of high resolution satellites that can get that information, but to see what the US would do about it.
Most conspiracy theories are false, but since nothing about the official explanation makes any sense at all, the only conclusion a logical person can arrive at is there must be another explanation the officials are choosing to not reveal in public. Maybe the the spy balloon was collecting similar SIGINT to what was being collected at that observatory?
A SOLAR observatory which was shut down by the FBI without reason was due to foreign hacking and spying, conspiracy theorists have suggested online.
Ever hear of Atmospheric Refraction? We can add that to the long list of science concepts that flat earthers seem to be completely ignorant about. Because of atmospheric refraction, when the sun is low in the sky, we actually see it displaced from its actual position because the Earth's atmosphere bends the light rays, as this diagram indicates:
originally posted by: TDDAgain
originally posted by: FlyInTheOintment
because photos of targets over 480km distant from the observation point have been seen clearly, a fact which is impossible if we indeed live on a spherical planet.
So where are these photos? And where is proof that the distance was 480km. How was that distance measured? With a map? If so, what kind of projection did that map use? If not, how was the distance measured?
I often read claims like yours but where is your evidence? It's only in your head.
Ever hear of Atmospheric Refraction?