I’ve always thought this video from 1990 is really amazing and credible - was filmed before CGI was in the public realm and clearly shows something
doing some crazy manoeuvres above Area 51. It seems to have been forgotten about:
Looks like a fake as the "orb" follow the movements of the "camera" at some points and the added blur looks fake and the camera is not even following
the "orb" it is just filming the clouds in front. Looks some old VHS tape have been edited to look like there is a ufo in the sky. And you using the
word "Amazing footage" about his is just as suspicions as the video itself.
Same as the other extra-ordinary evidence. Grainy, pixilated, shakey camera and no idea or frame of reference.
This is weak evidence, in fact its no evidence ad we don't know what we're looking at, also it seems to be a light reflection as it moves with the pan
of the camera.
If they (The NGO's) wanted us to know about UFOS then we would already. The fact that the occupants are just dandy with all the secrecy, in the face
of our suffering, makes the occupants even worse than those working with them.
I hope they stay in space. Or whatever dimension they're from.
How in the hell. You can't hardly see anything the film quality is total shat. It shows a blinking light. But with the film quality, it might as well
have been Dumbo the elephant flapping his ears to fly, or could have been a parachuter, a helicopter, literally anything, because the ONLY thing you
can really tell from the video is there is something in the air thats flashing.
That's it.
"Crazy manoeuvres", how can you tell?
It is by far the worst footage of "UFO"s I have seen in my life.
The footage from 1966 is much better, even though older.
These are from the days before cell phones and ability to instantly film anything, of course the quality is not of today's standards.
After seeing one of these huge vehicles hovering and soaring in the sky, I do not doubt that they are here, and have been with us for millenia.
originally posted by: RonnieJersey
The footage from 1966 is much better, even though older.
These are from the days before cell phones and ability to instantly film anything, of course the quality is not of today's standards.
I am in the process of converting my parents' 8 mm movies from 1969 to 1973 to a digital format, and they look better that the video in the opening
post.
You would think a "professional photographer of the military" would of had a better camera then that. As a STILL photo would of been better then the
grainy crap, case in point photos from 1920. If you actually
look at old photographs from that time, the quality wasn't exactly terrible. So that in itself is what makes it 100% hard to believe these 'videos'
aren't created by some 'professional' wants to make a name for himself.
To top it off, he'd of had a real camera not some video camera if he was doing anything for the military - as even 1920 camera's surpassed the 1950
video as far as quality of shots go. Then you count in the +25years technology or so the military holds back from the public and then it becomes
impossible to believe it's remotely real. Here's video that features clips from 1874 to 1911 . So it's hard to believe a
'professional military photographer' would have a camera of such low and subpar quality, especially when he's obviously 'recording from helicopter'.
Then when you tack on another 40(+25)years equal the date of the video that quality doesn't line up.
In 2006 they had satellites that could read the number off your pencil - so tech and video was/is a lot further then you are lead to believe. It's
just not available to common folk only 'military'...
Use the youtube slider and find the 1888 video (3rd bubble). Even that video is of way better quality then what these posers claim. While I don't
doubt the existence of extra terrestrial there is a huge difference between people looking for their 5minutes of fame and the real deal. Most 'leaks'
from the military are essentially advertisements to join the military: It helps boost their revenue to have a bunch of 'officers' claim to see things
to get the unexpected conspiracy theorist to sign up in hopes of seeing something. It's why they let that crap continue even with NDAs in place -
people have been executed for way less then leaking 'top secret information'. When it comes to these things.
Here is a video from 1950 catalina for reference The skyshot with the bird flying isn't 'pixelated' and you can clearly both
the sky and clouds clear as day, along with the the ropes to the sails as the 'passenger' is recording going past. At 4:45 you can see the sky's
horizon which isn't whitewashed or pixelated(unlike the pixelation in 'certain places' of those videos) only. Again just further proof those videos
are fake and nothing more then a revenue stream to peak the interest of 'young minds' on what they might see if they join the military.
You can get life's answers by joining us "Are we alone?" this question every person has asked themselves at least once in their life. So it's a viable
tactic for recruitment. But either way, with the way this tech has advanced over the years. I'd never believe anything that has any form of
'pixelation' that doesn't align itself with quality of the time. That includes today's technology, way to many 'pixelations' on HD video recordings.
edit on 111120231631 by BlackArrow because: (no reason given)