Nazi roots of the NWO

a reply to: stevieray

I think, it speaks for itself that you felt the need to react to something that wasn't adressed at you. You didn't even make the effort to understand the context.

it seems to me you very much cling to echo chambers and tend to see differing opinions as a threat... chill your socks I'm not stealing your candy....

Or am I

originally posted by: strongfp
a reply to: ancientlight

What position of power does he hold? He's simply the owner of a glorified feel good think tank for corporations to virtue signal how great they are because they pay a bunch of eco fascists and poli sci brainiacs to talk a bunch of nonsense about climate change and demographic sustainability.

I think you answered your own question there. Corporations control modern society. They are used as they can operate outside of normal laws and constitutions that individuals and governments are subjected to. So it goes without saying those who control the corporate agendas have the real power. Whether Schwabb is a dictator or following orders, he's still a powerful, and very bad man.

originally posted by: Terpene
a reply to: ancientlight

point being, your ancestor's crimes are not yours....
at least that's what I get from the slavery reparation discourse, and it seems logic, but maybe you have a different approach...

Except Klause Schwab is following in those Nazi footsteps. The offspring of anyone's grandparents are not keeping slaves.

The irony here is that you haven't seen or fathomed that point and instead used a strawman argument.

a reply to: Terpene

No, they weren't.

Most were slaves.

a reply to: AAmerican

It could be something to do with pre-industrial economics, mechanisation stopped slavery. So logically if no viable energy source comes into play after the oil goes we might be looking at a different social structure.

a reply to: NoCorruptionAllowed

Totalitarianism is not Nazi, nazi means national socialist, emphasis on national how is that going to work with a one world government?

How is it a straw man argument, pointing out faulty reasoning when looking for confirmation bias?

as they say the road to hre
ell is paved with good intentions

the actual arc goes liberalism through to nazism as much it went through to communism.

both are reactions to the failure of liberalism as that is where liberalism ends up.

if we look at it in terms of people the west starts with galton and end with a Starlin or Hitler figure.

so looking around this is where we are now.. we are in the eye of the storm, or the 1923 collapse of liberalism after 100 years of being the driving force for change.

for the uk the rupturing of liberalism gave rise to labour and solidified the tories as the most successful political force since the liberal party and it looks like the tories are about to implode as liberalism did in 23..

if we follow that trajectory then right now someone is the new Starlin, the new Hitler and the new Musolini. and we face a new war of unimaginable destruction and suffering.

Personally I feel that the title for this thread is wrong and needs adjustment.

The NWO were around in various guises a hell of a long time before the Nazis existed. So the title should be flipped, the NWO roots of the Nazis. Hitler was a paid contributor to the NWO goals.

originally posted by: Terpene
a reply to: NoCorruptionAllowed

Totalitarianism is not Nazi, nazi means national socialist, emphasis on national how is that going to work with a one world government?

How is it a straw man argument, pointing out faulty reasoning when looking for confirmation bias?

Socialism and communism are always used as a springboard to totalitarianism, dictatorship, call it what you will.
And they never can be made to work, so of course they’re the perfect fake. Too bad there’s always a sadly large group that are too dumb to resist the siren song of the commie / Marxist perfect utopian fairness and equity. Which always ends up with an even more disgusting upper class than capitalism.
It’s funny that you mention Hitler / Nazis. This is exactly what he did. Got all the goofy commies on his side to get him in place, then he killed them all and went totalitarian.

originally posted by: Terpene
a reply to: stevieray

I think, it speaks for itself that you felt the need to react to something that wasn't adressed at you. You didn't even make the effort to understand the context.

it seems to me you very much cling to echo chambers and tend to see differing opinions as a threat... chill your socks I'm not stealing your candy....

Or am I

Haha, “context”. The last refuge of someone who spoofed themselves.
It’s right up there with “hahaha you made my point” and “you just don’t get it”.
And funny thing, nobody ever actually explains “the context” and how it made them correct. Just saying the word ….. I win !!

a reply to: stevieray

Hmm, well, your whole post seems unhinged. The haha made me think of Nelson, the insecure bully from Simpsons.

When adressing posts that aren't directed at you but are an answer to another post it helps to maintain integrity when first trying to understand the context, instead if just reacting... Oh and maybe you first need to understand the meaning of context at all...

context
kŏn′tĕkst″
noun

The part of a text or statement that surrounds a particular word or passage and determines its meaning.

The circumstances in which an event occurs; a setting.


Texture; specifically, the entire text or connected structure of a discourse or writing.

.

Dude good thing your opinion about my personality is totally worthless... You're showing the level of discourse you're used to.
I guess 4chan isn't helping in honing those debating skills?

a reply to: MetalChickAmy

Looking at the current state of macro politics, We have two superpowers in distress, Joe can't put two words together, and Putin seems under coup-type pressures. All countries have a very high sickness and death rate. The projected food production with regard to staples is in distress due to adverse growing conditions. Self-inflicted energy concerns are ramping up as well. All resources seem to be directed into war production instead of food production. The level of Censorship is very high and getting worse. The economies seem to be teetering from one crisis to the next. Shortages seem to be steadily growing in essential medical supplies. Governments can only do so much even if they concentrate on their resolve. Which they don't appear to be doing. We do not know what is happening in China but the occasional glimpse seems that they are not immune to the growing stress. In this present environment, anything could happen.
Shwab is more of a symptom of the times than the cause.

originally posted by: Terpene
a reply to: stevieray

Hmm, well, your whole post seems unhinged. The haha made me think of Nelson, the insecure bully from Simpsons.

When adressing posts that aren't directed at you but are an answer to another post it helps to maintain integrity when first trying to understand the context, instead if just reacting... Oh and maybe you first need to understand the meaning of context at all...

context
kŏn′tĕkst″
noun

The part of a text or statement that surrounds a particular word or passage and determines its meaning.

The circumstances in which an event occurs; a setting.


Texture; specifically, the entire text or connected structure of a discourse or writing.

.

Dude good thing your opinion about my personality is totally worthless... You're showing the level of discourse you're used to.
I guess 4chan isn't helping in honing those debating skills?

Lol, still with the “context”, and throw in a “you don’t know what it means” and the obligatory reference to 4chan. The only classic self-owns that you missed are Stormfront and “literally Hitler”.
Your response to the things I made fun of ….. was to jump right up and do them, for all to see.
And I’m still waiting for the actual context that makes you “the debate winner”, to be explained to us.
You can’t just keep repeating the word, to give yourself legendary status.

a reply to: stevieray

legendary status.

Achieved

originally posted by: Terpene
a reply to: ancientlight

Many peoples grandparents were slave owners...

whataboutisms for thread derailing.

To argue klaus Shwabs family history is not worth discussion seems to be supporting its origins. Why are you supporting nazis?

originally posted by: ITSALIVE

originally posted by: Terpene
a reply to: ancientlight

Many peoples grandparents were slave owners...

whataboutisms for thread derailing.

To argue klaus Shwabs family history is not worth discussion seems to be supporting its origins. Why are you supporting nazis?

NTM Soros, Merckel, and others. There’s a very interesting connection between today’s NWO and Hitler’s first try at it.
It’s the most logical idea in the world.
But there are a bunch of people on ATS who have volunteered to be available always, forever, to gum up threads whose ideas they don’t like.
They won’t explain why the idea is wrong,
But they will yell “context!” and “you don’t even understand it !”
What a hoot, as those crazy kids say these days.

originally posted by: Terpene
a reply to: stevieray

legendary status.

Achieved

But maybe not for the best of reasons.