Can America have a fair election in the future for the good of the American People

originally posted by: PorkChop96
a reply to: quintessentone

And you're still dodging the question asked to you a long time ago.

You are dodging the answer I gave way back in this thread.

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: vance
We've had fair elections since george washington set em up. It's just not everybody likes the outcome.
Just Like a child not getting its way. I voted for trump twice, He lost once whether he admits it or not. I won't waste my vote on him this time

Truth right here. When someone's chosen candidate wins then the belief becomes fulfilled, that the election was fair and just. It's exactly child-like behaviour - unrealized child-like behaviour.

It doesn't matter any longer.

The bad guys have won, the Republic is dying.

Trump can't save us, hell, the left will have him killed before he sees the Oval Office again.

Republicans can't get a spine to stand up against the left.

Hell, puddin', celebrate.

Your team will have a glorious 1000 year Reich rule.

My team are middle of the road rational government.

Yet you support censorship.

It's been established.

So no, not so much "middle of the road".

I support anti-LGBTQ activists not protesting their particular kind of intolerance in front of children, or directly at children. Do you support that?

a reply to: quintessentone

That was not the answer tot he question asked. That was your response of "belief" bs.

The question of "when has an election been fair" has yet to go answered by you. You said I would not like the answer you gave, I responded with lets find out and it has still gone answered. Either answer it or move on to a thread you have your biased answers for.

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: vance
We've had fair elections since george washington set em up. It's just not everybody likes the outcome.
Just Like a child not getting its way. I voted for trump twice, He lost once whether he admits it or not. I won't waste my vote on him this time

Truth right here. When someone's chosen candidate wins then the belief becomes fulfilled, that the election was fair and just. It's exactly child-like behaviour - unrealized child-like behaviour.

It doesn't matter any longer.

The bad guys have won, the Republic is dying.

Trump can't save us, hell, the left will have him killed before he sees the Oval Office again.

Republicans can't get a spine to stand up against the left.

Hell, puddin', celebrate.

Your team will have a glorious 1000 year Reich rule.

My team are middle of the road rational government.

Yet you support censorship.

It's been established.

So no, not so much "middle of the road".

I support anti-LGBTQ activists not protesting their particular kind of intolerance in front of children, or directly at children. Do you support that?

Cherry-picking, you support censorship.

You are not a supporter of the 1st Amendment.

originally posted by: PorkChop96
a reply to: quintessentone

That was not the answer tot he question asked. That was your response of "belief" bs.

The question of "when has an election been fair" has yet to go answered by you. You said I would not like the answer you gave, I responded with lets find out and it has still gone answered. Either answer it or move on to a thread you have your biased answers for.

An election has been fair only when the desired candidate was elected. If the desired candidate was not elected then the election was not fair. That is as simple an answer I can give you for your understanding because obviously the previous answer (which has the same meaning) you had trouble grasping it's meaning.

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: vance
We've had fair elections since george washington set em up. It's just not everybody likes the outcome.
Just Like a child not getting its way. I voted for trump twice, He lost once whether he admits it or not. I won't waste my vote on him this time

Truth right here. When someone's chosen candidate wins then the belief becomes fulfilled, that the election was fair and just. It's exactly child-like behaviour - unrealized child-like behaviour.

It doesn't matter any longer.

The bad guys have won, the Republic is dying.

Trump can't save us, hell, the left will have him killed before he sees the Oval Office again.

Republicans can't get a spine to stand up against the left.

Hell, puddin', celebrate.

Your team will have a glorious 1000 year Reich rule.

My team are middle of the road rational government.

Yet you support censorship.

It's been established.

So no, not so much "middle of the road".

I support anti-LGBTQ activists not protesting their particular kind of intolerance in front of children, or directly at children. Do you support that?

Cherry-picking, you support censorship.

You are not a supporter of the 1st Amendment.

Deflection and not answering the question, you are predictable.

originally posted by: opethPA
a reply to: musicismagic


Does that mean the candidate you prefer has to win for it to be fair in your mind?

Because I respect you, I'll offer you a perspective you likely don't think about.

During the 2016 elections and after, we all saw how the "machine" worked. The DNC said Trump was a Russian agent. Then the MSM piled on, then the IC piled on. Soon, if you didn't believe that Trump was owned by Russia, you were a crazy right wing nut job. This lasted 3 years. Economy was great, we weren't in any new wars, peace was breaking out in the middle east with the Abraham Accords, and then Covid hit.

We were all gaslit with the covid propaganda, told how bad things were, made to feel as if we didn't count if we weren't vaccinated. then came the 2020 elections. "the machine" wanted Trump gone so badly they pulled out all the stops. Remember BAMN? We do. Remember the FBI getting caught silencing the laptop story that would have sank Biden? We do. Remember the IC doing the same? Yep, we do. The election had an element to it no other election in our history had. Universal mail in ballots. Everyone got one, and because of covid, some normal things had to be relaxed. Like signature verification. We all watched the 3 am jump to Biden wins in all the key areas. All of them. When we said "hey, this doesn't seem right", we were again made to be RWNJs. The MSM, our peers, even friends on this site piled on to make anyone who believed in "the big lie", feel as if they were crazy. This was the most secure vote in the history of man.

We even brought up things that didn't seem right. More gaslighting to make sure if you said anything about it, you were shunned and laughed at.

So we are supposed to believe that even though the very same people who were caught railroading Trump with the Russia thing, (fact, not up for debate) the same people who said they would remove Trump By Any Means Necessary, the same people who pushed for mail in ballots, relaxed rules, and a media psyop like none other, this was the most secure election in our history, and if you question it, you are crazy.

Even with the media telling me how wrong I am, I think that if you believe this election was fair, you are crazy. You are lying to yourself and everyone else. there are so many things pointing to fraud it's frightening.

So in answer to your question, no, my candidate doesn't have to win for this to be a fair election. But if anything "new" is done with regard to the election that isn't more secure, and leans towards "relaxing" some rules, the bullsh!t flag will be raised high and proud. And none of that requires anyone's approval. I just thought you should hear it in context.

a reply to: quintessentone

The "desired candidate" does not have the meaning you are intending it to. In all instances, the "desired candidate" is the one that they want to win, not who we want to win. Big diference

a reply to: quintessentone

Right back at you bud

originally posted by: PorkChop96
a reply to: quintessentone

The "desired candidate" does not have the meaning you are intending it to. In all instances, the "desired candidate" is the one that they want to win, not who we want to win. Big diference

There was nothing difficult to understand in the meaning of my last post. Twisting it around in your mind is a predicable necessity of confirmation bias.

a reply to: quintessentone

Sorry reality is so hard for you to come to grips with. I never said it was difficult to understand, sorry reality hurts your little feels so much

There was no reason for Biden to win, other than that they wanted a president they could control and manipulate to do what they want, that was not Trump. And when Biden is done doing so, or can't do it anymore, they will shove Harris up there to do the same thing or the next in line after that if necessary

originally posted by: PorkChop96
a reply to: quintessentone

Sorry reality is so hard for you to come to grips with. I never said it was difficult to understand, sorry reality hurts your little feels so much

There was no reason for Biden to win, other than that they wanted a president they could control and manipulate to do what they want, that was not Trump. And when Biden is done doing so, or can't do it anymore, they will shove Harris up there to do the same thing or the next in line after that if necessary

Did it ever occur to you that making up excuses as to why your candidate didn't win is part of the psychology of false belief? In your mind, who are "THEY".

a reply to: quintessentone

There is no excuse there, ask many others and you will find that this is a common belief. Or am I not aloud to have my beliefs? Do I need to clear them with you before I have them? They are people like you who did not want someone who spoke their mind and couldn't be controlled by the powers to be.

originally posted by: PorkChop96
a reply to: quintessentone

There is no excuse there, ask many others and you will find that this is a common belief. Or am I not aloud to have my beliefs? Do I need to clear them with you before I have them? They are people like you who did not want someone who spoke their mind and couldn't be controlled by the powers to be.

People like me want people to realize the reality of the political divide and how you are all being programmed.

a reply to: quintessentone

And exactly how is that?

a reply to: WakeUpBeer

There's really nothing that can be done. When a country like the US becomes a 1 Party State at the level of the National level the only fix is for it to fall apart like the old USSR which ended the Russian Communist Party.

originally posted by: PorkChop96
a reply to: quintessentone

And exactly how is that?

I explained the false belief psychology and there is also the 'activating animus' aspect. Very interesting observation at source.

www.npr.org...

a reply to: quintessentone

Yes because someone who I have never met, talked to, or know anything about can tell me exactly why I believe what I believe....okay princess

originally posted by: PorkChop96
a reply to: quintessentone

Yes because someone who I have never met, talked to, or know anything about can tell me exactly why I believe what I believe....okay princess

But that's just it, a false belief is you knowing what you believe but not why you believe it.

a reply to: quintessentone

I have no false beliefs. Who are you to tell me anything about myself? Know something about me that I don't? If so, please do tell