It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: namehere
since when does it make sense to demand evidence to prove your own accusations? are they #ing idiots?
that's like walking up to some random stranger and saying "oh hey you robbed someone, give me evidence you did it or I'll arrest you for having no evidence of a nonexistent crime you never committed"
we got some real einsteins in the house of Representatives
Shameful. A moderator is pointing out language and grammar as a means of demeaning another’s comment.
originally posted by: Ksihkehe
originally posted by: namehere
since when does it make sense to demand evidence to prove your own accusations? are they -snipped- idiots?
Since they have the right to demand it, given by the people that elected them, and the FBI has a duty to provide it for the people that pay their salary?
Last I checked the "einsteins" in government were able to use proper grammar and punctuation in their documents, with no potty words.
Perhaps your house has a bit too much glass to be throwing rocks?
Could Bill Clinton be the verified whistle blower? He is close to death, both in age and in health, so a normal person in his life position might try and do the right thing in order to make things right before they die.
originally posted by: carewemust
This week, the FBI told Congress it can't share evidence it has that JOE BIDEN accepted a bribe to affect (effect?) American Policy towards a particular country, when he was Barack Obama's Vice President.
THE REASON? Sharing this with Congress might jeopardize human life...
originally posted by: Allaroundyou
a reply to: Gothmog
Tis a not too far off thing to be considered.
Especially given all the crap that is coming out and the inaction by the FBI to clear its own name.
I would like to give them the benefit of a doubt because I am not privy to the inner workings and such that goes on.
But I just can't anymore.
I hope they can prove me wrong, only time will tell.
originally posted by: CryHavoc
originally posted by: carewemust
This week, the FBI told Congress it can't share evidence it has that JOE BIDEN accepted a bribe to affect (effect?) American Policy towards a particular country, when he was Barack Obama's Vice President.
THE REASON? Sharing this with Congress might jeopardize human life...
No matter the reason, the FBI can't or doesn't have to respond to a request if there is an ongoing investigation.
A lot of people don't seem to get that people in Congress are not investigators. They need to stop overstepping.
is it telling the site moderators response to you? Why react with such vitriol to defend the “Einsteins” in government?
originally posted by: namehere
since when does it make sense to demand evidence to prove your own accusations? are they #ing idiots?
that's like walking up to some random stranger and saying "oh hey you robbed someone, give me evidence you did it or I'll arrest you for having no evidence of a nonexistent crime you never committed"
we got some real einsteins in the house of Representatives
The reason that Biden , Bush , Clinton , Obama & Trump get away with things is because the corruption is complete.
originally posted by: carewemust
Wednesday, May 24, 2023
This week, the FBI told Congress it can't share evidence it has that JOE BIDEN accepted a bribe to affect (effect?) American Policy towards a particular country, when he was Barack Obama's Vice President.
THE REASON? Sharing this with Congress might jeopardize human life...
Source: www.foxnews.com...
House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer sent a letter to FBI Director Wray today, stating that the FBI has "failed to produce the FD-1023 form, or offer any reasonable accommodation that would allow the Committee to review the document."
According to the letter, Comer is giving the FBI until Tuesday May 30th to comply with the subpoena, and threatened to "initiate contempt of Congress proceedings" if the agency refuses to hand over the document.
In a statement to Fox News, an FBI spokesperson said: "The FBI’s mission is to protect the American people. Releasing confidential source information could jeopardize investigations and put lives at risk.
Those of you who have been following events and investigations that ultimately were made NON-Classified/DE-Classified, did you see anything in the documents that would have "endangered lives" at that time?
--For instance, every time President Trump tried to declassify documents related to the Crossfire Hurricane investigation, even after it was over, his Attorney General, CIA Director and Director-of-Intelligence, would tell him that De-Classifying these documents would be jeopardize LIVES and expose Sources and Methods. And, if he went around them and declassified C.H. materials unilaterally, he'd be impeached and removed from office.
--When Consumer Advocate organization JUDICIAL WATCH was finally able to get ONE of the important Crossfire Hurricane documents de-classified during the height of the Covid-19 Pandemic (5/26/2020), the information turned out to be more incriminating of U.S. Government officials, than a Risk to innocent Human Lives and Sources! (Naturally, 95% of the News Media ignored it.)
--Here is a good Judicial Watch video summary of the Hillary Clinton-devised and Barack Obama-approved, Electronic Communications (EC) document that initiated the Crossfire Hurricane "Trump Entrapment" program: www.judicialwatch.org...
--And a News Article description of the freshly declassified "EC" document: thehill.com...
DOES ANYONE KNOW of an FBI (not military) Declassified Document that, had it been Declassified during the "operation" or "investigation", would have jeopardized human life? One that you've seen and said to yourself, "Oh Wow... I see why the FBI kept that information classified!"?
-CareWeMust
originally posted by: CryHavoc
originally posted by: carewemust
This week, the FBI told Congress it can't share evidence it has that JOE BIDEN accepted a bribe to affect (effect?) American Policy towards a particular country, when he was Barack Obama's Vice President.
THE REASON? Sharing this with Congress might jeopardize human life...
No matter the reason, the FBI can't or doesn't have to respond to a request if there is an ongoing investigation.
A lot of people don't seem to get that people in Congress are not investigators. They need to stop overstepping.