It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
perspective grasshopper
page: 19
share:
so i went to listen to dr seans statement at the senate hearing that had the debunker crowd all goose bumpy where he said "aaro has found no credible
evidence thus far of extraterrestial activity, off world technology, or objects that defy the known laws of physics" and he went on to say but if they
do theyre going to tell nasa first? hmm thats weird, i thought theyd tell the president and nsc first but ok, anyway lets untangle his quoted
statement from all the govt talk
first he said thus far, which probably means aaro is just starting so give them some time to see if they can figure these uap out, in other words nothing ruled in nothing ruled out
he threw in there extraterrestial activity which i guess was just for fun because nobody brought that up but him so could that be something their definately considering or was that just for sensationalism purposes? who knows right? just weird that it was included imo
he said off world technology which might be an ode to dr davis' testimony, could they have looked into that and havent found it? yet? or he has and just not going to tell us
he said objects that defy the known laws of physics, key word known, we humans dont know what they know, they might know things we havent learned yet, its possible they dont defy the laws just use them in a different way, the historical record with the speeds, manuervers, g forces, 5 observables, the sound barrier, etc., points to something unique and not normal to human flight understandings, so if thats defying or not i guess thats up for debate
people are pointing to the sen g podcast interview where she gave no hints as to what she knows, are you shocked? what she knows about uap is secret and as a sitting us sen shes not not going to tell anybody anything, but her leading this effort from the sen speaks volumes and is appreciated
finally why would debunkers waste one minute trying to convince us ufo people that were crazy? i hope theyre being paid at least, nothing worse than a broke debunker lol, they seem to be trying to muddy up the waters but what for? were trying to get our hands on govt data so we can scrutinize ourselves not necessarily looking to govt to tell us what to think but to show us the data so that we can come up with our own thoughts as to what that data represents, i guess some people in the ic might think its better to keep this subject ambiguous so as to not cause panic? its bad enough that there are american debunkers but foreigners, dont get me started
p.s. i usually ignore ufo footage on the internet due to cgi but recently ive seen some shocking things, i dont know whos behind it but i like it, so my question is have you seen any videos recently that should be investigated? if so tell us how we can see it without violating ats rules please
first he said thus far, which probably means aaro is just starting so give them some time to see if they can figure these uap out, in other words nothing ruled in nothing ruled out
he threw in there extraterrestial activity which i guess was just for fun because nobody brought that up but him so could that be something their definately considering or was that just for sensationalism purposes? who knows right? just weird that it was included imo
he said off world technology which might be an ode to dr davis' testimony, could they have looked into that and havent found it? yet? or he has and just not going to tell us
he said objects that defy the known laws of physics, key word known, we humans dont know what they know, they might know things we havent learned yet, its possible they dont defy the laws just use them in a different way, the historical record with the speeds, manuervers, g forces, 5 observables, the sound barrier, etc., points to something unique and not normal to human flight understandings, so if thats defying or not i guess thats up for debate
people are pointing to the sen g podcast interview where she gave no hints as to what she knows, are you shocked? what she knows about uap is secret and as a sitting us sen shes not not going to tell anybody anything, but her leading this effort from the sen speaks volumes and is appreciated
finally why would debunkers waste one minute trying to convince us ufo people that were crazy? i hope theyre being paid at least, nothing worse than a broke debunker lol, they seem to be trying to muddy up the waters but what for? were trying to get our hands on govt data so we can scrutinize ourselves not necessarily looking to govt to tell us what to think but to show us the data so that we can come up with our own thoughts as to what that data represents, i guess some people in the ic might think its better to keep this subject ambiguous so as to not cause panic? its bad enough that there are american debunkers but foreigners, dont get me started
p.s. i usually ignore ufo footage on the internet due to cgi but recently ive seen some shocking things, i dont know whos behind it but i like it, so my question is have you seen any videos recently that should be investigated? if so tell us how we can see it without violating ats rules please
edit on 3-5-2023 by saskwatch because: there
originally posted by: saskwatch
"aaro has found no credible evidence thus far of extraterrestial activity, off world technology, or objects that defy the known laws of physics" .....
Yes, that's great, but what is the INCREDIBLE EVIDENCE ?
Definition is key with statements like this I believe. Right there in the open, hidden in plain sight maybe.
a reply to: [post=26988586]saskwatch[/post
In your last two, long posts, I get the impression that you're wanting somebody in government or some semi-official organization to tell us something we don't know. Well, that ain't the way the game is played. TPTB say nothing of worth for over seventy years and that will extend for probably another seventy years or to the end. The ploy is to keep the public guessing correctly bit by bit until they slowly get the gist of the reality.
Really, no one wants to hear the truth and no one on ATS even wants to dare attempt to take stock of the situation except for those of us crazy and/or dumb enough to attempt to make some sense of what is underway. Strangely, you are ahead of those that simply keep silent and would rather discuss mundane human affairs without ever a glimpse to the goals of the ETs.
In your last two, long posts, I get the impression that you're wanting somebody in government or some semi-official organization to tell us something we don't know. Well, that ain't the way the game is played. TPTB say nothing of worth for over seventy years and that will extend for probably another seventy years or to the end. The ploy is to keep the public guessing correctly bit by bit until they slowly get the gist of the reality.
Really, no one wants to hear the truth and no one on ATS even wants to dare attempt to take stock of the situation except for those of us crazy and/or dumb enough to attempt to make some sense of what is underway. Strangely, you are ahead of those that simply keep silent and would rather discuss mundane human affairs without ever a glimpse to the goals of the ETs.
originally posted by: saskwatch
he said objects that defy the known laws of physics, key word known, we humans dont know what they know, they might know things we havent learned yet, its possible they dont defy the laws just use them in a different way, the historical record with the speeds, manuervers, g forces, 5 observables, the sound barrier, etc., points to something unique and not normal to human flight understandings, so if thats defying or not i guess thats up for debate
We can only analyse things according to what we know.
If he said that they didn't saw any credible evidence of "objects that defy the known laws of physics" then it means that all the credible evidence they saw followed the laws of physics as we know them.
It doesn't mean that they know how those objects use the known laws of physics.
new topics
top topics
-
Federal law trumps state and local law every time
Social Issues and Civil Unrest: 16 hours ago, 17 flags
9