It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
x 47b a highly advanced unmanned combat drone, has been deployed by the US military and has entered Eastern Europe. which are designed to carry out surveillance and strike missions, are part of a wider military operation aimed at deterring aggression in the region. deployment of X 47 B marks a significant step forward in the US military's use of unmanned technology. Unlike traditional piloted aircraft, the X47B can operate for a long time without the need for a human pilot.
originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: putnam6
The X-47B hasn’t flown in years. It isn’t going to Eastern Europe or anywhere else. That video is years old from when they were lifting it aboard a carrier for at sea trials. They were never meant to deploy and never entered active service. They carried out the test program and were retired, and currently sit in hangars at Plant 42.
Military [email protected] subscribers202 videos
The Military Foundation provides you with footage from the Army, Navy, Marine Corps, Air Force, and Coast Guard. We also post a variety of the latest videos such as weapons, planes, tanks, ships, weapons, artillery, vehicles, military operations and the latest military news.
Subscribed
subscribe
Description
The Military Foundation provides you with footage from the Army, Navy, Marine Corps, Air Force, and Coast Guard. We also post a variety of the latest videos such as weapons, planes, tanks, ships, weapons, artillery, vehicles, military operations and the latest military news.
originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: putnam6
There are several channels that make similar claims, then turn around and post the most outrageous, obvious BS that you’ve ever seen. The last time the X-47Bs were moved anywhere, it created such a stir that it wasn’t even funny. The only way to move it would be my truck, as they did, or by C-17 or C-5. Either way would draw huge amounts of attention, by everyone freaking out over the “UFO” If they went by truck, or by how incredibly weird it is to have a C-5 or C-17 at Plant 42. And if they trucked it to Edwards to land the cargo aircraft at, it would still stir things up. Either by being seen, or by the fact that they were suddenly gone. There’s been zero chatter about them since the end of the program.
originally posted by: putnam6
It's ironic the internet was supposed to be efficient and get news quickly and accurately, and now you have to find a story and verify it 3-4 times.
originally posted by: schuyler
originally posted by: putnam6
It's ironic the internet was supposed to be efficient and get news quickly and accurately, and now you have to find a story and verify it 3-4 times.
What it really does is give any bottom dweller a venue for nonsense with no verification whatsoever
originally posted by: F2d5thCavv2
a reply to: putnam6
For a moment, I thought they meant this babe.
😁
Cheers
Drogue chutes
The aircraft was so aerodynamically clean that rapid descent ("penetration") from high cruise altitude to the landing pattern required dragging the deployed rear landing gear. The relatively high wing loading (weight/wing area) required a high landing speed of 180 kn (330 km/h). To shorten the landing roll, USAF test pilot Major Guy Townsend promoted the addition of a 32 ft (9.8 m) German-invented "ribbon" drag chute (thrust reversers had not then been developed).[43] For the same reason, the B-47 was the first mass-produced aircraft to be equipped with an anti-skid braking system.[citat