It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: SentientBunnySuit
The war against the Second Amendment shows no sign of slowing down, and little to no appetite exists for Congress to act to safeguard the rights that safeguard all Americans. Is there a brave person in Congress who would dare kill two birds with one stone? How? Tie all funding of foreign lethal military aid to only those arms which are available to be lawfully held by US Citizens in the most restrictive states. You want to send a shipment of California compliant featureless rifles with tool-release-only 10 round magazines to Ukraine? Sure, go nuts! Anything else is a hard nope, punishable by time in a GEO Group or CoreCivic Brand Federal prison. Thoughts?
originally posted by: SentientBunnySuit
The war against the Second Amendment shows no sign of slowing down, and little to no appetite exists for Congress to act to safeguard the rights that safeguard all Americans. Is there a brave person in Congress who would dare kill two birds with one stone? How? Tie all funding of foreign lethal military aid to only those arms which are available to be lawfully held by US Citizens in the most restrictive states. You want to send a shipment of California compliant featureless rifles with tool-release-only 10 round magazines to Ukraine? Sure, go nuts! Anything else is a hard nope, punishable by time in a GEO Group or CoreCivic Brand Federal prison. Thoughts?
Fix yout thread mate.
originally posted by: BeNotAfraid
"The WAR against the 2nd Amendment.."
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Nice 1a. Here's 2a.
2a won.
originally posted by: billxam
a reply to: SentientBunnySuit
No. As usual the "well" thought out line of reasoning will once more be "The time is not right" and "The next time, we'll get them for sure!" so that business as usual will continue as usual. As it usually does.
originally posted by: Crackalackin
a reply to: Wide-Eyes
I think that was the point or at least I hope it was. Lol