Well look at what we have here! COVID was most likely a lab leak WSJ

Also
Our government “selling” a vaccine for something THEY KNOW was created in a lab is super sinister.

This will only get much worse.

originally posted by: Maximus0111
This morning I looked and didn't see this posted. This article was put up this morning 2/26/2023 at 7:00 AM. Finally, they are saying that COVID was most likely caused by a lab leak in China.

Lab Leak Most Likely Origin of COVID

Your source is behind a paywall so here's a version that has all the same data and observations but no subscription fees.

www.washingtonexaminer.com...

originally posted by: flice
a reply to: Ophiuchus1

I think it's very important that this is uncovered, because it helps fuel the lack of trust in media and politicians.

They lied, even though the evidence was there the whole time.

We DO NOT owe allegiance to any governing body or individual who forces us to make decisions base of lies and disinformation.

Of all the technological advances…..man has not found …imo…a rock solid way of exposing the truth in Evil. We may have Sodium Pentathol….we may have Polygraph Lie detectors…..yet the legal system would say that neither results is admissible in court. There will always be lies.

As for not owing allegiance to any governing body………well to change government, is not by voting for different parties within the same government they serve…..but instead, to revolt in a physical revolution as have been previously done, to wholly change governments in societies past.

👽

a reply to: Maximus0111


So.....


Like it wasn't OBVIOUS. Anyone with 2 brain cells already knew this. The CORONAVIRUS disease originated outside the CORONAVIRUS Lab where you are experimenting with CORONAVIRUSES.

a reply to: Maximus0111

AND

We all helped them develop it...

That may take a few more months to come out officially.

a reply to: Maximus0111

Even Jon Stewart’s dumb ass knew it wasn’t kosher.

originally posted by: Ophiuchus1

originally posted by: flice
a reply to: Ophiuchus1

I think it's very important that this is uncovered, because it helps fuel the lack of trust in media and politicians.

They lied, even though the evidence was there the whole time.

We DO NOT owe allegiance to any governing body or individual who forces us to make decisions base of lies and disinformation.

Of all the technological advances…..man has not found …imo…a rock solid way of exposing the truth in Evil. We may have Sodium Pentathol….we may have Lie detectors…..yet the legal system would say that neither results is admissible in court. There will always be lies.

As for not owing allegiance to any governing body………well to change government, is not by voting for different parties within the same government they serve…..but instead, to revolt in a physical revolution as have been previously done, to wholly change governments in societies past.

👽

I am 100% in line with that ideology...

a reply to: infolurker

In my opinion, there's still some blanks in the dialogue around "dual use research" which is where medicine technology shakes hands with the bioweapons division of the military defense industry. To that end, I want to submit the following excerpt:

To date, the response of the scientific community largely has been to assert the value of open scientific dialogue and exchange of information, self-governance, and increased communication among all affected sectors. However, others support mandatory government regulations in addition to, or in lieu of, voluntary measures.77 For example, Elisa Harris told the committee at the June 2006 regional meeting that “The choice is not between regulation or self-governance. Neither one on its own is sufficient to be effective. To develop an effective response, we need to do both. We need self-governance and we need regulation.”78 Others at the regional meetings suggested the need for more strenuous measures in certain areas of the life sciences. For example, at the May 2006 regional meeting, George Church proposed surveillance measures, in synthetic biology, “of the whole stream of chemicals from precursors, which are unique to oligonucleotides, to synthetic genes to instruments that employ these, to even experts in the field.”79 At their 2006 meeting, Synthetic Biology 2.0, synthetic biologists were offered a draft “community declaration” regarding the ethical use of synthetic biology and the governance of synthetic biology research as it relates to the threat of bioterrorism. This proposal for self-governance would have been consistent with the “culture of responsibility” that NSABB is urging the life sciences community to develop, and it also might have had the effect of staving off “attempts to set controls or limits on the field.”80 Draft recommendations dealt with the stated need to promote, establish, and/or standardize monitoring systems within companies, domestically and internationally, that can detect potentially harmful sequences or combinations of sequences and also to improve such monitoring technologies.81

At the June 2006 regional meeting, Gigi Gronval, University of Pittsburgh, cautioned against an overly restrictive approach:

…I would recommend that we have to accept some level of risk from dual-use research. Scientists need to recognize that their work could be misused, and there need to be mechanisms to make sure that they do the work safely and smartly. But on the other hand, and this is more addressing a code of conduct discussion, but I don't think that scientists can promise to do no harm. They can promise to intend to do no harm, but what they uncover is very often by serendipity and there should be some mechanism to deal with the consequences of an experiment, as well as just the intent. So what is at stake if we don't accept some of this risk and push forward? We will harm research that needs to be done in a time of crisis. In conclusion, I would recommend three things, [first] that we promote self governance and we promote self awareness as scientists as best we can to make sure that work is done safety and is done as fast as possible in the public interest. Second, that the information that is uncovered that is dual use be used to inform strategy. Third, we need to get better at response in general, because eventually prevention efforts are going to fail for a deliberate attack, and it is certain, certain, certain that we are going to have another natural epidemic of a new disease that we don't know how to deal with.

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov...

originally posted by: shooterbrody
Also
Our government “selling” a vaccine for something THEY KNOW was created in a lab is super sinister.

This will only get much worse.

This has to be reposted again and again, until it sinks into peoples brains, including the idiots defending the "official" story.

Someone found a similar story with the same reporting on a different site without the paywall.

concludesCoronavirus most likley orginated for a lab leak

a reply to: bastion

Moderna paid the NIAID $400 million as a catch-up payment. This was not disclosed by Fauci at all while he was leading the NIAID.

Rand Paul was trying to get this info this whole time, with no luck.

Moderna Pays NIAID
a reply to: shooterbrody

originally posted by: flice

originally posted by: shooterbrody
Also
Our government “selling” a vaccine for something THEY KNOW was created in a lab is super sinister.

This will only get much worse.

This has to be reposted again and again, until it sinks into peoples brains, including the idiots defending the "official" story.

View the timeline with this knowledge, there are crimes to charge.
All those elderly in ny city?
All those mandated to take an experimental drug.

These crimes need to be held to account.

originally posted by: The2Billies
Well I won't say I told you so - from the very beginning.

But I told you so.

Many on ATS told you so.

Yes, we did.

This also kind of underlines that WHO is a terrorist organisation controlled by private interests... they knew, all along.
And they lied.

originally posted by: midicon

Will anyone be held to account?

If WE never let up and keep doing what we're doing, momentum and potential lead to inevitability.

Our mind and our memories perhaps don't get as distracted and diverted as much as the flocks we are trying to help and save.

We have many spades for digging and many flags for marking and we have a constantly updated news feed from everywhere and we don't let ignorance get far past the doormat.



We must be gentle with the "nay-sayers" who may soon become a little more silent when things are mentioned and discussed. Thinking is silent, except for the visual appearance of whirring cogs... that's a good sign.

I find that passing on facts with a reference for the recipient seems to work. Doubting one's self is where an individual's truth lies. The ONLY one that can be believable perhaps.

Thanks for posting and sharing.

Be aware many current and future "scientific" opinions and facts will be politically enhanced to create chaos and "reverse-forward" confusion 😎

originally posted by: flice
This also kind of underlines that WHO is a terrorist organisation controlled by private interests... they knew, all along.
And they lied.

didn't someone sever ties with the WHO due to them being shady over this? I think I remember something about that.

originally posted by: IAMTAT

originally posted by: The2Billies
Well I won't say I told you so - from the very beginning.

But I told you so.

Many on ATS told you so.

Yes, we did.

I seriously do not understand how so many idiots stuck to the story of "Natural Origin" when we have known for years now that this was not even a remote chance compared to the Obvious viral engineering that happened.

Cell Phone Data Records Shows Shutdown of Wuhan Virology Lab in October

Bartiromo broke news this morning that cell phone records show there was a shutdown at the Wuhan Virology Lab in October of 2019.

Cell phone data suggests the roads around the Wuhan lab was shut down for a number of days in October.
This was around the same time of the expected viral release.

Senator Cotton also added there is no doubt the Chinese Communist Party officials were pressuring the W.H.O on communications around the virus.

www.abovetopsecret.com...

www.nbcnews.com...

The report — obtained by the London-based NBC News Verification Unit — says there was no cellphone activity in a high-security portion of the Wuhan Institute of Virology from Oct. 7 through Oct. 24, 2019, and that there may have been a "hazardous event" sometime between Oct. 6 and Oct. 11.

Lancet Finally Publishes COVID Lab-Leak Information, Arguing No Direct Evidence For Natural Origins

www.abovetopsecret.com...

There is so far no scientifically validated evidence that directly supports a natural origin.

There is so far no scientifically validated evidence that directly supports a natural origin.

Neither the host pathway from bats to humans, nor the geographical route from Yunnan (where the viruses most closely related to SARS-CoV-2 have been sampled) to Wuhan (where the pandemic emerged) have been identified.

Since July, 2020, several peer-reviewed scientific papers have discussed the likelihood of a research-related origin of the virus.

Some unusual features of the SARS-CoV-2 genome sequence suggest that they may have resulted from genetic engineering, an approach widely used in some virology labs.

Mice genetically modified to display the human receptor for entry of SARS-CoV-2 (ACE2) were used in research projects funded before the pandemic, to test the infectivity of different virus strains. Laboratory research also includes more targeted approaches such as gain-of-function experiments relying on chimeric viruses to test their potential to cross species barriers.

a reply to: IAMTAT

As mentioned in February of 2020

nypost.com...

And then there is this little-known fact: Some Chinese researchers are in the habit of selling their laboratory animals to street vendors after they have finished experimenting on them.

You heard me right.

Instead of properly disposing of infected animals by cremation, as the law requires, they sell them on the side to make a little extra cash. Or, in some cases, a lot of extra cash. One Beijing researcher, now in jail, made a million dollars selling his monkeys and rats on the live animal market, where they eventually wound up in someone’s stomach.

SUDDENLY the MSM is deemed wholly accurate. Right.