Its Possible U.S. President Joe Biden Shot Down an Alien Flying Over Alaska on 2.10.2023.

a reply to: Enduro

Do we have enough ice cream for them all?

originally posted by: SleeperHasAwakened

originally posted by: beyondknowledge
a reply to: carewemust

Only if they let him. Humans would most likely not be able to do it for real. Especially three times in a row.

Precisely that ^^^

If one has read/watched testimony from Commander Fravor and other fighter pilots that came forward regarding encounters they've had with UFOs, then it should be crystal clear that our most advanced aeronautical and weapons systems are no match for the UFOs. The can't get close enough to get a weapons lock and in the small off chance they do, how is a chemical propelled sidewinder missile going to hit something going mach 20+ that can make 90 degree turns at that speed.

Allegedly our military has beyond next-gen radiant energy weapons systems, and depending on to whom you listen and believe, these weapons have been brought to bear and have downed UFOs. Maybe, maybe not.

So I agree, the carefully curated efforts in the press to avoid calling these things what they are, "balloons" or "craft" or whatever, and calling them "unidentified flying objects" is nothing but games from MSM, best case they're playing word games with the facts, worst case is this a ruse (i.e. the Von Braun scenario)

you're proposing there is only one alien race visiting earth. it may be much more, with different levels of tech.
shooting at something you don't know or don't understand as a first response is wrong IMO.

originally posted by: 38181
The Government and military official’s main job is to CTA (cover their arse). Someone messed up on the big balloon fiasco, now it’s CYA in overdrive.

They are now on Shoot anything down that doesn’t look like an airplane on the radar screen mode.

It's like to movie 1941

a reply to: carewemust

Just wondering, if, and it's only an if at the moment, China shoots down their own UFO, will you be so vocal in your outrage at China?

caution!

we know there's a problem when we get ultra high officials saying bu!!sh!t like this: 🤣

Chuck Schumer Says Chinese Spy Balloon Was Acceptable Because Chinese Would've Gotten Intel Anyway

a reply to: xuenchen

He is just running errands.... he has no clue what he is saying.

This has turned into containment, whatever they shot down.

American citizens are 2nd rank humans to politicians, that's the way it is and always has been. And you silently approve.

My question is whether this vehicle was in American air space or if it was over international waters? Did we actually have a right to shoot it down if it was past the boundries of our airspace.

I have read that it was over the ocean, but it was not stated where it actually was in relation to our airspace.

If Biden says to shoot it down it is most likely legitimate to do so in his mind...if he has one.

Chucky Schmucker is probably getting constituents panicked phone calls.

Wait till one of these UAP’s or it’s debris drop into a population center…..

It may happen in our lifetime.

👽

originally posted by: oddscreenname
a reply to: carewemust

Do we have proof) pictures of these other shot downs? Or are we supposed to take the words of a known group of liars? "We didn't shoot down the first one until everyone complained but we definitely and conveniently got the others quickly!"

I have been asking this since Friday's shootdown. Where are the photos? Why is it taking 7 days to retrieve balloon wreckage that's only 50 feet below the surface off of Myrtle Beach?

originally posted by: Guyfriday
a reply to: carewemust

That is if these 40,000ft balloons are even real. Do we have any confirmation on these?

Only Senator Chuck Schumer says everything witnessed by pilots and/or shot down, is a balloon. He's actually better/smoother at lying than Barack was.

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: Guyfriday
a reply to: carewemust

That is if these 40,000ft balloons are even real. Do we have any confirmation on these?

Only Senator Chuck Schumer says everything witnessed by pilots and/or shot down, is a balloon. He's actually better/smoother at lying than Barack was.

High rankers like Schumer over emphasizing always means there's much much more being hidden as the red herrings fly 😎

a reply to: carewemust

now come on bloke, your normally pretty switched on.
joe shot down sweet bugga all. the USAF. did.
or are we being ragged.
i doubt joe could shoot straight sitting on the bloody head.
remember, keep yer powder dry and stay logical

originally posted by: pronto
a reply to: carewemust

now come on bloke, your normally pretty switched on.
joe shot down sweet bugga all. the USAF. did.
or are we being ragged.
i doubt joe could shoot straight sitting on the bloody head.
remember, keep yer powder dry and stay logical

Commander in Chief of the U.S. Military is Joseph Robinette Biden, Jr.

BTW...

Update from the Pentagon...Sunday evening 2.12.2023

JUST IN - Pentagon does not know to what keeps these "objects" aloft, unknown propulsion systems.

"We're calling them objects, not balloons, for a reason," says U.S. Air Force General Glen VanHerck.

More at: redstate.com...

So you really think we shot down a UFO, which we can't, and they would tell us about it, which they wouldn't?

originally posted by: carewemust


Update from the Pentagon...Sunday evening 2.12.2023

JUST IN - Pentagon does not know to what keeps these "objects" aloft, unknown propulsion systems.

"We're calling them objects, not balloons, for a reason," says U.S. Air Force General Glen VanHerck.

More at: redstate.com...

Is it even possible to talk propulsion possibilities hypothetically “assuming” the objects are Not balloon’s?

Ok ……..so far we have a description of two unknown (place of origin) UAP’s…..

1) Alaska - size of small car or 55 gallon drum (by some sources). Oddly enough, a 55 gallon drum is Cylindrical in shape.

2) Canada - Cylindrical in shape, gray to silver in color.

It’s not sure that a balloon envelope was attached to either or both ….has been emphasized to be fact from developed sources so far.

To question the propulsion of the UAP’s, what can probably be deduced from both objects?

The explosion or lack of explosion from the point of impact when the Sidewinder Missiles hit the objects.

What would have been the fireballs of the explosion had the objects had been Nuclear powered, Plasma powered, Electromagnetic powered, Chemically powered, Solid Fuel powered, etc?

So, if it wasn’t a Nuclear type explosion, i.e……then odds are, the objects propulsion was not Nuclear…..and so on for the rest……….”if it wasn’t this, then it couldn’t have been that” type of deduction…….

Any guesses?

👽

2.14.2023 (Happy Valentine Day!)

Former Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe describes how the Biden Administration is covering-up truths.

a reply to: Ophiuchus1

Great analysis on your part!

IMO, Unless we get more information about the objects shot down after the Chinese Spy Balloon was shot down, we have to assume those shoot-downs (and the objects) were "faked".

It’s funny that here we are…..on Tuesday…..and no further reports of any new objects since the weekend.

I didn’t know the objects don’t work Monday through Friday’s …..so to speak.

Somewhere, at this present time of our lives, there are a group of people, or being’s…….studying human reactions to UFO’s. A study of “can we humans, as a species, handle it” …are we ready for full disclosure?

Generally…..I’d say possibly so.

Although concerns have been voiced……straight out, there’s been no major panic to “jump out of the widows” “head for the hills” “bunker down” ….in masse…it hasn’t happened.

Or…it’s possible that if there where any new sightings on a 7/24 basis, they would not be made public ….given the public reaction over the few that were presented from the past weekend. In other words, forget about getting any future new reports of new objects being made public

👽