It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Zanti Misfit
Guess they are going to have to Put a Tarp Over the Statue of Liberty in NY Harbor Now ............." Give Us Your Tired........"
BREAKING: One of the largest mass illegal crossings we have ever seen took place in Eagle Pass, TX this morning, w/ Border Patrol sources telling us over 2,200 people crossed there since midnight. It happened right next to the port of entry, as illegal immigrants continue to ignore Biden admin messaging of “do not come”, & do not fear the promised “consequences” for crossing illegally. Videos from source in MX & our FOX drone team on US side.
.
Doocy: "What do you call it here at the White House when 10k people cross the border in a single day?"
KJP: "What do YOU call it...when GOP put forth a - wait No! - No, no, no! - I tried to answer the question. You stopped me."
New York City business leaders have asked the Biden administration to provide more federal aid and expedite work permits for asylum seekers. If asylum seekers could work, they would likely find their own housing, which would ease the burden on New York and other city governments. Businesses around the country seek more workers to fill positions. Advocates recommend policies that would provide a more comprehensive solution amid an historic refugee crisis that analysts consider unlikely to be addressed through enforcement-only policies.
originally posted by: CoyoteAngels
a reply to: quintessentone
So forbes is now calling the invasion 'refugees'. From what? Their own failure at self governing? Economic pressure?
Is every poor person on the planet now called a 'refugee'?????
Well, we have alot of natural born American refugees then. Where should they go?
originally posted by: PorkChop96
a reply to: quintessentone
You want families, living in one of the most expensive cities in the country to live in, to take in MORE mouths to feed and take care of? Seems logical
Why are we going through so much to help these people who, came here illegally to begin with, before we even help those that are needing help in the country already?
originally posted by: Zanti Misfit
a reply to: JAGStorm
Guess they are going to have to Put a Tarp Over the Statue of Liberty in NY Harbor Now ............." Give Us Your Tired........"
originally posted by: PorkChop96
a reply to: quintessentone
If they want to step up and do that, whatever, they are allowed to do as they please. But the concept of asking them to do so is a little more than overstepping boundaries.
How do you not see anything wrong with leaving Us citizens out on the street and taking care of a some illegal "refugee"?
Why should we take care of the people fleeing a failed state before our own citizens?
What's your address? I'll make sure the next bus full of illegals, bringing disease and god knows what else, comes straight to your front door. Don't be a hypocrite, take them all in and give them everything they ask for and anything they need.
The U.S. has a strong tradition of welcoming newcomers and refugees. In the past year alone, we have seen Americans step up to welcome our Afghan allies, Ukrainians fleeing war, and people from our own hemisphere who are seeking safety, including Venezuelans, Haitians, Cubans, and Nicaraguans.
With the launch of the Welcome Corps, the U.S. government is making it possible for Americans to sponsor refugees from all around the world.
originally posted by: CoyoteAngels
a reply to: quintessentone
I heard a report last night from a contract employee with ICE. His job is to deliver unaccompanied minors to their 'sponsors'. He finally could not take it any more. The stories he told of this sponsorship program are horrendous. He is now coming forward as a whistleblower.
m.youtube.com...
originally posted by: CoyoteAngels
a reply to: quintessentone
How naive are you? Many of these children are being trafficed for sex and labor or for the benefit $$. Sponsors are often not altruistic at all. They dont care. Why do you think this system will be better for children than the foster system is. Probably even LESS investigation into where they are going.
You can put lipstick on a pig with all these 'programs', it's still a pig.