Mall Of America: Remove Your "Jesus Saves" Shirt Or Leave The Mall

originally posted by: crayzeed
Really for anyone to say they are offended is an offence of feelz. Minor compared to the offence on the man wearing a t shirt, ordering him to remove it. That is a physical offence.

Try wearing an atheist shirt in public.

Try not gaf and being an adult and not wearing word t shirts lol. Screaming look at me I require attention....

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: crayzeed
Really for anyone to say they are offended is an offence of feelz. Minor compared to the offence on the man wearing a t shirt, ordering him to remove it. That is a physical offence.

Try wearing an atheist shirt in public.

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Annee
Back of shirt.

So you are actually saying that people cannot express their personal opinions in public.


?

I'm all for no censorship and total free expression; But I would advise discretion. Someone that might be offended could knock your teeth out or stand their ground and blow your skittles off.... Your choice....

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: crayzeed
Really for anyone to say they are offended is an offence of feelz. Minor compared to the offence on the man wearing a t shirt, ordering him to remove it. That is a physical offence.

Try wearing an atheist shirt in public.

????????? Is an atheists t shirt a t-shirt with nothing on?

a reply to: olaru12

'm all for no censorship and total free expression; But I would advise discretion. Someone that might be offended could knock your teeth out or stand their ground and blow your skittles off

That could all happen just walking down the street in any major city in the nation as of late, or pushed in front of a subway car.

the person that punches should get arrested, and really weak 0 of 10 troll on the stand your ground law.

originally posted by: crayzeed

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: crayzeed
Really for anyone to say they are offended is an offence of feelz. Minor compared to the offence on the man wearing a t shirt, ordering him to remove it. That is a physical offence.

Try wearing an atheist shirt in public.

????????? Is an atheists t shirt a t-shirt with nothing on?

As an experiment -- wear an atheist shirt in public -- and see how free your "speech" is.

Not that everyone will know the symbol for atheism.

originally posted by: olaru12
I wonder what would have happened if that guy had of worn a shirt that said....

"Jews will not replace us"

btw....Jesus was a Jew.

“The Ghermezian family is a Canadian business family of Iranian Jewish origin. The Ghermezians are best known for building North America's three largest shopping malls: West Edmonton Mall, Mall of America, and American Dream. The family has been based in Edmonton since 1964.”

en.wikipedia.org...

They live close to me here and own West Edmonton Mall as well.

If it ends up being their corporate policy I just may buy a tshirt, lawyer up, and go shopping.

a reply to: Irishhaf

If he wasnt banned because of the other days, he had every right to be there, and his shirt is a piss poor reason to remove someone.

He wasn't asked to leave because of shirt. He was removed from the mall several days in a row for preaching at people. The security guard had every reason to believe he would be at it again. The guy with the shirt keeps saying, "But I haven't' said anything". He knew he was kicked out, several days in row, for saying things, not for wearing things.

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: crayzeed

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: crayzeed
Really for anyone to say they are offended is an offence of feelz. Minor compared to the offence on the man wearing a t shirt, ordering him to remove it. That is a physical offence.

Try wearing an atheist shirt in public.

????????? Is an atheists t shirt a t-shirt with nothing on?

As an experiment -- wear an atheist shirt in public -- and see how free your "speech" is.

Not that everyone will know the symbol for atheism.

Looks like something an autismo trekkie would wear.

a reply to: Sookiechacha

he security guard had every reason to believe he would be at it again.

So you are advocating pre-crime now?

Sure you want to make your stand on that hill?

originally posted by: Lysergic

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: crayzeed

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: crayzeed
Really for anyone to say they are offended is an offence of feelz. Minor compared to the offence on the man wearing a t shirt, ordering him to remove it. That is a physical offence.

Try wearing an atheist shirt in public.

????????? Is an atheists t shirt a t-shirt with nothing on?

As an experiment -- wear an atheist shirt in public -- and see how free your "speech" is.

Not that everyone will know the symbol for atheism.

Looks like something an autismo trekkie would wear.

LOL -- it kind of does.

There are many artistic variations,

Honestly, who still goes to the mall? lol

is it still 2001?

originally posted by: Irishhaf
a reply to: Sookiechacha

he security guard had every reason to believe he would be at it again.

So you are advocating pre-crime now?

Sure you want to make your stand on that hill?

What crime? I didn't see the police anywhere around, did you? It's private property. They have the right to refuse entrance to anyone for prior behavior and abuses.

a reply to: Annee

just a capital @? how quaint!

originally posted by: Sookiechacha

originally posted by: Irishhaf
a reply to: Sookiechacha

he security guard had every reason to believe he would be at it again.

So you are advocating pre-crime now?

Sure you want to make your stand on that hill?

What crime? I didn't see the police anywhere around, did you? It's private property. They have the right to refuse entrance to anyone for prior behavior and abuses.

Here's from their website rules.

I would consider the back of his shirt a religious slur to non-Christian beliefs.

Clothing/Attire
Appropriate attire, including shirts and shoes, must be worn. Inappropriate attire may include, but is not limited to:

* Apparel that has obscene language, obscene gestures or racial/religious/ethnic slurs that are likely to create a disturbance
* Clothing that deliberately obscures the face, such as hooded tops or masks
* Bulletproof vests or simulated bulletproof vests

www.mallofamerica.com...

a reply to: Annee

Wait...

What is this then?



American Atheists

originally posted by: Terpene
a reply to: Annee

just a capital @? how quaint!

In comparison to a "Cross" and a "Star"?

To olaru's post:

I wonder what would have happened if that guy had of worn a shirt that said....

"Jews will not replace us"

btw....Jesus was a Jew.

How about "Jesus' followers will replace us"? Is that any better?

Jesus was born Jewish but didn't follow Jewish laws as was given to Moses. Jesus decided which laws to keep and which to discard - is it any wonder the religious elite of the time were seeking his death? He was a revolutionist and attracted crowds.

He probably did, however, have legal disputes in which he defended himself by quoting scriptural precedent, which implies that he did not set himself against the law (Mark 2:23–28). His willingness to make his own decisions regarding the law was probably viewed with suspicion. Ordinarily, legal debates were between competing camps or schools, and individuals who decided how to observe laws were deemed troublemakers. That is, Jesus was autonomous; he interpreted the law according to his own rules and decided how to defend himself when criticized. He was by no means the only person in ancient Judaism who struck out on his own, acting in accord with his own perception of God’s will, and so he was not uniquely troubling in this respect, but such behaviour might nevertheless be suspicious.

www.britannica.com...

originally posted by: jerryznv
a reply to: Annee

Wait...

What is this then?

American Atheists

Artistic variation