posted on Jan, 14 2023 @ 10:50 AM
Thank you for the link OP. That's perfect for my time on the road.
I grew up reading the newspaper, and on most days I'm online for as much time as I used to spend reading ink on paper. Or a book, for that matter.
We're creatures of habit, and my generation had the habit of getting our news and entertainment (The comic section) from the paper. The time spent on
that transferred to the time spent online. Which isn't that much.
That's why my suggestion to you and anyone trying to cut down on screen time, is this: Go buy a newspaper. Start small. Start reading the news there.
When you find a story or op-ed piece you like, look at the byline. Then look up that person online and do what you need to do to make it easy to find
that person and read them. The alternative, of course, is just reading anything that crosses your path on that screen, which increases the time you
spend online, gives you more options, which increases your time online when you start sifting through those options. People have forgotten that having
less options to sort through will not make them “stupider”. It streamlines the time you take to get information, leaving more time to put that
information into your real, offline, life. Which in turn makes you appear smarter.
Want to check your bank balance? Go to your bank's ATM. Want to play a game? Go outside with friends. For everything you can do online, there is an
offline option. The sticking point, it seems, for many people is that things take a little longer to do offline than on. People are getting used to
that convenience, and that convenience is putting us online more. I think that's what they call irony. You spend time online to save time, but it
takes more of your time because you get addicted, in a way, to that convenience of “time saved”. Do we need to be online in 2023? Yes. No
question. But the majority of us don't need to be online as much as we are.
Television screens are kind of the same thing. Again, growing up we had 3 channels: NBC, ABC and CBS. Unless there was something physically wrong with
you, you didn't spend all day in front of a T.V. screen. Even those of us with social anxiety didn't do that. We got outside and tried anyway. That's
just what people did.
As an aside, people didn't use dating sites to find people they shared personal traits with. They, ironically, went outside and found them. The upside
is that you can't really lie about who you are when you are face to face with someone. Online? All the time. "I have social anxiety and 10 million
dollars" Guess how many people you're going to find that are nervous in public too.
Now, I'm a realist. I understand that the generations who grew up with a screen are not going to do what people of my generation are suggesting. But
for people like you, OP, who are sick and tired of being sick and tired (in a manner of speaking) there are baby steps people can take to reduce
screen time and any negative effects that may incur. The last time I looked, stores still sell newspapers and there is an on/off button on screens. If
it's a problem for anyone, just remember that we are, indeed, creatures of habit and that it takes somewhere between 6 and 9 months to break away from
old habits and slide into new ones. You just have to want it badly enough.
Sometimes it takes patience, and sometimes it takes more patience than the screens have taught you to have. That's the kicker. We have to do something
in a way that we were not “programmed” to do. Swimming against the current. Going against the grain. Being in a gunfight with a knife. However you
measure it out, the outcome is the same: It's hard to do. But it can still be done if you want it badly enough.
The bottom line is this: Whatever you do online, you can do offline. It just takes more time.