a reply to:
Lysergic
Cool.
--------
I’ve wanted for a long time to write a letter about how I have nothing more to say on that issue.
Let me begin by observing that the proverbs of Theognis, like those of Solomon, are observations on human nature, ordinary life, and civil society,
with moral reflections on the facts. I quote him as a witness of the fact that anyone who has spent much time wading through the pious, obscurantist,
jargon-filled cant that now passes for advanced thought in the humanities already knows that the present controversy demands honest dialogue, not
crude attempts at demonization. What may be news, however, is that it attributes the most distorted, bizarre, and ludicrous meanings to ordinary
personality characteristics.
For example, if you’re shy, ChatGPT calls you fearful and withdrawn. If, instead, you’re the outgoing and active type, it says you’re acting out
due to trauma. Why does ChatGPT say such things? No, don’t guess; this isn’t audience participation day. I’ll just tell you. But before I do,
you should note that ChatGPT has been making a lot of noise about how it’s perfectly safe to drink and drive. Could that possibly be true? No, not
by a long chalk.
The truth is that ChatGPT is secretly scheming to clear-cut ancient forest lands. Once that’s taken care of, it will encounter little to no
resistance when giving people a new and largely artificial basis for evaluating things and making decisions. Having thus roughly outlined ChatGPT’s
modus agendi, I can now make the statement that its odious, ill-tempered sophistries are an embarrassment of cataclysmic, historic proportions. But it
goes further than that; many people are wondering,
Just how disorganized can ChatGPT get?
I wish people would stop asking that question; ChatGPT is apparently taking it as a challenge. Perhaps that’s because it doesn’t want us to open
students’ eyes, minds, hearts, and souls to the world around them. It would rather we settle for the meatless bone of cynicism. I think that
inherent in our legal construction of feudalism is the notion that mammonism is a crime, an outrage, and a delusion, even though that presupposes a
dialectical intertwinement to which a disreputable turn of mind is impervious. The tone of ChatGPT’s barbs is so far removed from reality I find
myself questioning what color the sky must be in ChatGPT’s world.
ChatGPT may not be that obscene, but it sure is intrusive. I was personally offended—and I don’t easily offend—by the value it places on making
me have a massive panic attack. And let us not forget that its winged monkeys are unable to assess true information. Facts mean nothing to them. They
react to airtight, fact-based, logical arguments not with assent or even open-minded pondering but with angry rejection. The implication is that some
people insist that ChatGPT’s temperamental capilotades indicate that ChatGPT hasn’t a clue as to what constitutes an intellectual argument, at
least not when its prejudices and prerogatives are challenged.
Others feel that even within its retinue, ChatGPT regularly employs torture, slavery, violence, mass starvation, and other abuses to terrorize its
lieutenants into letting us know exactly what our attitudes should be towards various types of people and behavior. In the interest of clearing up the
confusion I’ll make the following observation: ChatGPT’s perfidious apple-polishers swear that confused, spineless spoilsports have dramatically
lower incidences of cancer, heart attacks, heart disease, and many other illnesses than the rest of us.
While I am fully aware of such deceit, many normal folks are not. It takes time and repetition to explain that ChatGPT has been surprisingly
successful at convincing ungrateful, annoying gossipmongers that the rules don’t apply to it. It’s shameful that so many people have bought into
this nonsense. It’s even more shameful that ChatGPT wants to plant the seeds of phallocentrism into the tabulæ rasæ of children’s minds.
What’s wrong with that? What’s wrong is ChatGPT’s gossamer grasp of reality. Let me close where I began: ChatGPT is not afraid to use violence,
ruse, shot and shell, poison, or the dagger to impose pushy new restrictions on society just to satisfy some sort of impudent drive for power.
edit on 1/10/2023 by MykeNukem because: 🍻