It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: M5xaz
a reply to: JAY1980
You left out the part where "this does not apply if you are part of the oligarch scumbag group"...
P.S. "oligarch scumbag group" is the term that should be used in all ATS posts, as opposed to "elite class" , as elite implies some form of superior ability/quality which these "people" clearly do not have (ex: Hunter Biden)
originally posted by: TzarChasm
I can sort of understand pro life politics when it regards infants who have no voice. I can't understand pro life politics when you are actively restricting medically fragile and exhausted people who DO have a voice from exerting their right to a dignified expiration. If you don't like it, politely say no thanks. But there ARE people who want it and deserve it.
originally posted by: Maxmars
a reply to: ChaoticOrder
I am inclined to agree with you. Most people who are in such a state that life itself is an intolerable condition must never be denied the opportunity to make their own choice. I would insist upon it myself.
But institutionalizing it as a 'solution' is one step shy of commercializing it as a service. That is what's next in this parade of exploitation. It can be segmented in so many ways, by race, by creed, by favorite sports team... the marketing opportunities are legion.
originally posted by: Maxmars
a reply to: ChaoticOrder
... the marketing opportunities are legion.
originally posted by: Zenchuck
a reply to: Hecate666
I watched an interesting interview with a reformed satanist who was able to climb the ranks within the satanic church through performing abortions. Murder of infants is high on the list of scoring points within those circles, and ending infant lives is of special interest to them. Just noticing your name here with 666 in the tag. You might know more about this than I do.
originally posted by: TzarChasm
a reply to: Athetos
If "professionals" stop asking permission and just sign you up for the MAID procedure, then there is a problem. On the flip side of that coin, people have been voluntarily offing themselves for centuries without anyone's permission.
And I’ve watched both my Oma and Opa die to painful cancers. I’d do it again if it means protecting the lives of innocents.
Not if it means infringing on the autonomy of medical fragile and exhausted patients you have no right to speak for. Imposing blanket protocols out of paranoia is how the vaccine mandates happened.
originally posted by: Athetos
What ever you say Mr Crowley
Lover of beasts
Do what thou wilt as long as it hurts no one else…interesting and what if what ever it is that’s being “harmed” isn’t yet considered a person? Then what?
Do what thou wilt to this cell mass….
Just because they don’t believe in your brand of Satan doesn’t make it fake….
a reply to: Hecate666
Forced sterilisations in Scandinavia have shocked the world. But the great founding fathers of British socialism, reports Jonathan Freedland, had dreams almost as vile as those of the Nazis
In 1912 the Mental Deficiency Bill was bought before Parliament, with an amendment that would prohibit the marriages between those deemed ‘feebleminded’. The passage was removed before the Bill was passed. However, fears around the so called ‘mentally defective’ procreating continued. Throughout the 1920s, the Eugenics Society called for the Ministry of Health to undertake an enquiry into the ‘best method of dealing with mentally defective and incurably diseased persons’, with the aim of making sterilisation legal.
Most of us are far nicer and less fake than a lot of religious folk.