Texas Supreme Court rules against father seeking to prevent 'chemical castration' of his son

A bad mother trying to ruin her son by chemical castration her own son.
Abusing the child and ruining the future of the child.

Women like these is exactly what is wrong with the current America.


The fact you have a republican state allowing a mother to abuse their own child of a father.
Only to further hurt the father by abusing the child by being chemically castrated in California



Texas Supreme Court rules against father seeking to prevent 'chemical castration' of his son

The courts prevented him from forcing the mother to bring the boys back from California. Younger has accused her of using the children to help advertise her "inclusive," "gender affirming" practice.

Thank the Liberals for pushing this "inclusive," "gender affirming" practice nonsense upon innocent children.


This "Practice" is only helping some women who have children abuse and are using this practice agaisnt their fathers/male guardians of the child.

To get back at them for whichever whatever the reason may it be finical or personal.

a reply to: vNex92

This headline is misleading I think.
The real issue started in 2021 when the mother was granted full custody.
I would like to know the reasoning of the judges decision.

The family court system is broken for sure.

a reply to: vNex92

America-and the rest of the world-certainly have problems, but your focus seems to be mostly on the flaws of the US.
Just out of curiosity, do you have a deeply rooted loathing for all things American, or do you just live in a perfect country with no flaws?

It's pretty rude to be a guest in someone's home and do nothing but complain about them.

Are there no 'gay rights' atrocities going on in your country? That would be amazing!

a reply to: nugget1

America-and the rest of the world-certainly have problems, but your focus seems to be mostly on the flaws of the US.

If you think the headline is only happening in US think again.

Are there no 'gay rights' atrocities going on in your country? That would be amazing!

"headline is only happening in US think again"

originally posted by: vNex92
a reply to: nugget1

America-and the rest of the world-certainly have problems, but your focus seems to be mostly on the flaws of the US.

If you think the headline is only happening in US think again.

Are there no 'gay rights' atrocities going on in your country? That would be amazing!

"headline is only happening in US think again"

Uh....I believe that's exactly what I said.

How about you tell us what's going on in YOUR country concerning all the crazy LGBTQ things being pushed on YOUR citizens?
Inquiring minds want to know. It might help us understand your deep, abiding hatred of America.

a reply to: nugget1

a reply to: nugget1

You must be confused i dislike the govt, politics of US.

a reply to: vNex92

There's a whole other side to the story that needs to be evaluated.

Younger was married to pediatrician Georgulas. Georgulas and Younger ended up in court fighting over the children when she believed that James, Younger's 7-year-old, wanted to live as a girl called Luna.

She petitioned the court to prevent Younger from "from signing Luna up as James for any activities or taking her as James or calling her James or using male pronouns related to Luna at any activities outside the home…"

She further asked the court to prevent Younger from "allowing the children to remain in the presence of anyone who is not calling Luna by her chosen name, 'Luna,' not using female pronouns to refer to her and otherwise not affirming Luna."

Georgulas began to believe James was a girl when he asked for a "girl's toy" from McDonald's and wanted to wear dresses, as well as began to emulate the female lead characters in Disney's Frozen. It was a counselor at the GENecis clinic at the Children's Hospital Center who advised Georgulas to "socially transition" James, according to court documents. Georgulas was affiliated with that hospital.

Younger, who had joint custody in 2019, was and remains entirely against this course of action. When James is with Younger, he does not ask to be called Luna, does not seek out girls' clothes. Yet a court determined that Younger must use the pronouns and names the ex-wife demanded.

In a video posted to the dad’s website, James is asked, "You’re a boy right?" Heavy reported.

"No, I’m a girl."

"Who told you you’re a girl?"

"Mommy."

The child said Anne also put James in dresses. "She buys me headbands. She gets me hair clips…she paints my nails."

“Do you think you’re a girl?” The child answered in the affirmative.

Additionally...

Georgulas was awarded custody by the Texas courts in 2021. "Dallas County District Court Judge Mary Brown awarded Georgulas full custody of James. Brown also eliminated the requirement that Jeff Younger be notified about James’ medical procedures, except for instances of hormone suppression therapy, puberty-blocking drugs, and gender reassignment surgery. Under that order, Younger must consent to any decisions made under those categories of procedure," The Texan reported.

There's only one side to this story.

Chemical castration of a child is wrong and should be illegal.

a reply to: TzarChasm

"Mommy."

Exactly this is a problem little boys usual listen to their mothers side while they are young.
When they grow up however that is another issue.

In my experience, the courts are rigged for the mother. Sure you can get a lawyer and ruin yourself financially but most don’t have that option and even if you do it’s still just a corrupt system you have to play in with no guarantees. Knowing that, I wouldn’t be surprised if the mother is found in a ditch. Sounds like she deserves it in my opinion.

originally posted by: Wide-Eyes
There's only one side to this story.

Chemical castration of a child is wrong and should be illegal.

It only requires one parent to consent, and that parent does. Perhaps the father should have considered their incompatible politics a bit more before impregnating a woman he wasn't ready to build a family with.

originally posted by: TzarChasm

originally posted by: Wide-Eyes
There's only one side to this story.

Chemical castration of a child is wrong and should be illegal.

It only requires one parent to consent, and that parent does. Perhaps the father should have considered their incompatible politics a bit more before impregnating a woman he wasn't ready to build a family with.

Have you ever heard of this term, "victim blaming"?

There is ZERO EXCUSE for doing that to a child... I mean, are you for real!?

a reply to: NormalGuyCrazyWorld

But here's the thing: parents have total jurisdiction. You can't spend one debate defending parental discretion and another debate minimizing it. Pick one.

Did any of you actually read this case?

Georgulas began to believe James was a girl when he asked for a "girl's toy" from McDonald's and wanted to wear dresses, as well as began to emulate the female lead characters in Disney's Frozen. It was a counselor at the GENecis clinic at the Children's Hospital Center who advised Georgulas to "socially transition" James, according to court documents. Georgulas was affiliated with that hospital.

From OP's sources.

Read the court documents for a better understanding of what 'social transitioning' means.

web.archive.org...://savejames.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/Court-Transcripts-Excerpts-7-10.pdf

...re: the father's visition rights being severely curtailed - and here's the reason: "only if he is nonconforming, which is detrimental to the child"...

It isn't what you think, he's trying to get his children BACK from California and for good reason.

Sucks they ruled against him, must of been a reason...

originally posted by: TzarChasm

originally posted by: Wide-Eyes
There's only one side to this story.

Chemical castration of a child is wrong and should be illegal.

It only requires one parent to consent, and that parent does. Perhaps the father should have considered their incompatible politics a bit more before impregnating a woman he wasn't ready to build a family with.

That is actually a very good point. People make that exact mistake quite often because they aren't thinking with the head on their shoulders before tying the knot. This particular situation is a stark example of what poorly made life decisions can lead to.

a reply to: quintessentone

Read again in the headline.
The boy believes his a girl because his mommy is feeding him that part.

From this story from Texas.

Its clear that the mother has some issues going with her.

Its clear she doesn't like the father of the child.

originally posted by: quintessentone
Did any of you actually read this case?

Georgulas began to believe James was a girl when he asked for a "girl's toy" from McDonald's and wanted to wear dresses, as well as began to emulate the female lead characters in Disney's Frozen. It was a counselor at the GENecis clinic at the Children's Hospital Center who advised Georgulas to "socially transition" James, according to court documents. Georgulas was affiliated with that hospital.

From OP's sources.

Read the court documents for a better understanding of what 'social transitioning' means.

web.archive.org...://savejames.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/Court-Transcripts-Excerpts-7-10.pdf

...re: the father's visition rights being severely curtailed - and here's the reason: "only if he is nonconforming, which is detrimental to the child"...