Canadian doctors using fake vax passes.

originally posted by: shinzaun

Removed by staff

Spam.

Gotta say I don't believe what I posted was spam. Or is that the mods not wanting to admit they made a mistake?

originally posted by: Middleoftheroad
a reply to: shinzaun

You don’t wanna make a million? I mean come on, it’s obviously a very legit site. Just requires a credit card to get started.

Oh is that all I need?!
Damn! Wish I'd have clicked on the link now!

originally posted by: AaarghZombies
a reply to: anonentity

You mean Thisguy

He's a strong proponent of government censorship who sought to restrict the flow of information so that people would be unable to do their own research.

This is the man who wanted to prevent the government from releasing mortality statistics to the general populace.

You're not only promoting a member of the establishment, but one who wanted to prevent people from speaking out.

That is a total misrepresentation of the article and you should be ashamed of yourself for this intentional twisting of the content. He was trying to stop Fauci, an employee of the government on government time, from promoting pseudoscience that has no scientific basis. More than 170 Comparative Studies and Articles on Mask Ineffectiveness and Harms. That he didn't want Fauci promoting lies on the government dime isn't restricting people's ability to do their own research. That this specious claim is coming from somebody that believes an employer or government should have the right to require people to take an experimental vaccine under EUA is not at all a surprise given your endless devotion to the fight against human rights.

He wanted Fauci to stop feeding ignorant shills ammunition for the completely false claim that children were at any serious risk from COVID or that there was any kind of evidence that masking children prevents them from spreading a virus they didn't have. A recommendation which Fauci himself latered claimed he never made. This would have prevented the even more preposterous future lie that children benefit from COVID vaccination that was then parroted by ignorant shills across various platforms.

Your duplicity and the ease with which you contradict yourself from post to post should make any honest reader's skin crawl.

originally posted by: AaarghZombies
a reply to: MykeNukem
You may or may not be aware of this, but those numbers aren't just professionals, they include people such as janitorial staff and care assistants. Literally anybody in the industry.

There are STILL thousands upon thousands of MD's and RN's and PSW's that lost their jobs, as I stated and documented for you. Keep in mind, no one is reporting this, these numbers are just from the people who spoke up.

That they may not have been able to get vaxxed under the government scheme due to their immigration status (We had an amnesty because this was getting pretty bad), and in many cases, that they were being sent significant quantities of doom porn from their home countries about conspiracies to use vaccines to sterilize Muslim women.

Source? Thousands and thousands of these?

Can I cite myself for the above, minus vampires and werewolves, which I'm not a believer in?

Sure you can, but then your previous statement would make no sense.

originally posted by: DAVID64
a reply to: anonentity

It would be very telling to see the real number of Big Pharma CEOs, researchers and scientists who developed this, that actually took the vaccine.
We saw Biden getting a shot, but what was it ? Would they risk the Presidents life on an experimental vaccine just to get the public to go along ? Or was it just saline ?

Joe is a new kind of President. A throw away leader for a disposable society. I would go so far as to call him a sacrificial resident of no consequence or merit.

a reply to: MykeNukem

. He was trying to stop Fauci, an employee of the government on government time, from promoting pseudoscience that has no scientific basi

He tried to muzzle public data releases. Basic statistics. Things that people need to know in order to be properly informed.

a reply to: anonentity

I wouldn't be surprised if this were true.

a reply to: DAVID64

It wouldn't have looked good if Biden dropped dead a day or two after vaccination. Especially during a speech or public appearance.

a reply to: Ksihkehe

More than 170 Comparative Studies and Articles on Mask Ineffectiveness and Harms.

I'd wager that you've not actually read any of them.

For example, the very first report on that page contains the following text

A systematic review of observational studies reported that mask use reduced risk for SARS, Middle East respiratory syndrome, and COVID-19 by 66% overall,

originally posted by: AaarghZombies
a reply to: Ksihkehe

More than 170 Comparative Studies and Articles on Mask Ineffectiveness and Harms.

I'd wager that you've not actually read any of them.

For example, the very first report on that page contains the following text

A systematic review of observational studies reported that mask use reduced risk for SARS, Middle East respiratory syndrome, and COVID-19 by 66% overall,

First, when you quote the work of others and you don't link the direct source it's copyright infringement.

Second, the quote you pulled from the first article is merely two statements alleged to be supported by other articles and is in no way confirmed by the actual study the authors you quoted conducted. You would understand if you had any idea what you're talking about or any intention of honest discussion.

Since you bring up these secondary referenced studies and obviously read them thoroughly, perhaps you can make up some cockamamie excuse about these quotes.

First the claim of mask use reducing risk by 66% overall sourced as (12)

Face mask use could result in a large reduction in risk of infection (n=2647; aOR 0·15, 95% CI 0·07 to 0·34, RD -14·3%, -15·9 to -10·7; low certainty), with stronger associations with N95 or similar respirators compared with disposable surgical masks or similar (eg, reusable 12-16-layer cotton masks; pinteraction=0·090; posterior probability >95%, low certainty)

Funding: World Health Organization.

Let's look at the second part sourced as (18) which is the next sentence you omitted which said no non-health care studies included COVID.

The review identified no eligible studies on the use of cloth masks in community settings.

N95 respirators should not be used in a community setting, given the absence of demonstrated benefit, the possible harm with improper use (that is, the requirement for fit testing)

Unlike N95 respirators, surgical masks and cloth masks do not require special fitting, making their use more practical if individual fitting is infeasible. Persons should seek guidance from the local community and statewide public health guidelines for mask use in light of the absence of evidence in the community setting to reduce the risk for transmission of SARS-CoV-2 infection

The WHO notes potential risks associated with mask use, including self-contamination (via improper handling of masks), breathing difficulties, and a false sense of security

Given the limited direct evidence, our practice points are based on indirect evidence from studies of SARS-CoV-1, MERS-CoV, influenza or influenza-like infections, and other respiratory infections.

Low-certainty evidence showed that mask use and consistent mask use may reduce

So, let's recap. You quoted an article you failed to link to. The full statements in the studies were supported by two studies that you clearly didn't read, had no high certainty, had lots of indirect qualitative evidence, was partially funded by the WHO who takes policy recommendations from an autistic billionaire with no actual qualifications, and the best they come up with in the end is "may reduce" and "low certainty".

In addition to that both sources confirmed things I've told you over and over and you refused to acknowledge as being true. That cloth masks have no evidence supporting their use, that N95 masks should not be used for the general public, that they can in fact increase risk, and that none of them have rigorous study of efficacy.

Let's move on the rest of the study you cherry-picked secondary sourced tertiary bs from here and see what they actually found.

4862 completed the study. Infection with SARS-CoV-2 occurred in 42 participants recommended masks (1.8%) and 53 control participants (2.1%).

Although the difference observed was not statistically significant

If you thought this was it....

a reply to: AaarghZombies

JUST WAIT, THERE'S MORE, AS PART OF TODAY'S INTRODUCTORY SPECIAL OFFER!

From the pertinent studies highlighted directly on the page I linked first!

We know that wearing a mask outside health care facilities offers little, if any, protection from infection. Public health authorities define a significant exposure to Covid-19 as face-to-face contact within 6 feet with a patient with symptomatic Covid-19 that is sustained for at least a few minutes (and some say more than 10 minutes or even 30 minutes). The chance of catching Covid-19 from a passing interaction in a public space is therefore minimal. In many cases, the desire for widespread masking is a reflexive reaction to anxiety over the pandemic

“Evidence from 14 randomized controlled trials of these measures did not support a substantial effect on transmission of laboratory-confirmed influenza…none of the household studies reported a significant reduction in secondary laboratory-confirmed influenza virus infections in the face mask group

“The available clinical evidence of facemask efficacy is of low quality and the best available clinical evidence has mostly failed to show efficacy, with fourteen of sixteen identified randomized controlled trials comparing face masks to no mask controls failing to find statistically significant benefit in the intent-to-treat populations.

“In a Bangladesh study, surgical masks reduced symptomatic COVID infections by between 0 and 22 percent, while the efficacy of cloth masks led to somewhere between an 11 percent increase to a 21 percent decrease. Hence, based on these randomized studies, adult masks appear to have either no or limited efficacy.”

though we support mask wearing by the general public, we continue to conclude that cloth masks and face coverings are likely to have limited impact on lowering COVID-19 transmission

Please blind me with science, professor. We await your asinine attempts to work around the fact that you were told this easily verifiable information based on decades of public health precedent and science, but believed the television and a feckless little tyrant that contradicted himself and lied constantly. Please bring us more low certainty "could" and "may" wearing a mask of "settled science" like Zorro to save the day.

originally posted by: AaarghZombies
a reply to: MykeNukem

. He was trying to stop Fauci, an employee of the government on government time, from promoting pseudoscience that has no scientific basi

Things that people need to know in order to be properly informed.

Oh the irony.

People needed to know the vaccines were not safe and effective but lies was all we heard and the demonisation of any who said otherwise.

Informed consent for the general public requires not being a EUA product, having a properly written product insert in the package, enough time with adequate data to make a clear decision. Instead, it was a case of "you will lose your job if you don't get this product for a barely dangerous disease".

How people can defend what happened, I just don't know. It's insane.

a reply to: igloo

Good morning igloo. Please consider checking your u2u's when you have a few minutes.

good, they shouldn't need them at all

originally posted by: MykeNukem
a reply to: anonentity

Thousands upon thousands of Doctors and Health Care Professionals have lost their right to practice medicine for opposing the Covid vaccines here in Canada.

So, I guess some of them, in order to keep their careers and not take the vaccine, have been using fake vaxports.

I don't blame them actually. That's what happens when the government acts like a Dictatorship.

What followed was a journey down a rabbithole of anti-Covid-19-vaccine rhetoric, conspiracy theories and one claim that the pandemic was a “planned exercise in population control." It concluded with an argument from defence lawyer, Swinwood, that Canada’s COVID-19 restrictions are akin to Nazi Germany regulations.

But these views from licensed medical professionals — seemingly at odds with the science that an education in medicine preaches — are not confined to this one virtual court hearing in Ontario. A small but vocal minority of doctors across Canada is attempting to sway public opinion to oppose COVID-19 vaccines.

Many are being investigated or have had their medical licences suspended. Many have not.
MSN

Hearings like the above are/were a routine occurrence.

"at odds with the science that an education in medicine preaches" 👈 this sounds religious, not scientific. LMAO.

The Ontario board of medicine made a statement in 2021 that was basically, "Any doctor who speaks against the vaccine, loses their license."

That is not science. That is a dictatorship.

a reply to: thebtheb

Trudeau is a WEF pretty boy who has been groomed since a young age to think he is special. His hangers-on can see a good thing when they see him coming, so they obviously doubled down on what he was thinking to prove they are in the crowd because to end up anywhere else at this stage of the game would be suicide. This absolute power trip seems to have him showing signs of paranoia because his security guys have told him he is now a target. Which pushes them up the ladder of the inn crowd and secures their positions for the coming economic collapse. They want your guns simply because they have done things that have pissed a lot of people off and they know it. The strange thing is that they are continuing to do it, my bet is that by now organized crime won't like the idea of a digital payday, and have already taken out contracts on the few key players in what has been going on. Which of course will raise the paranoia level even higher. Biden in the States is expendable if anyone gets to him, the whole top echelon is puppets.
They will stay in power now because they have to survive, like Stalin said it isn't who votes it is who counts the votes. None of them can afford to let go of power because they are all in too deep. After this fiasco with mandates, they will keep doubling down until they are left with a handful of dust. The college of surgeons is integral in a medical dictatorship, so they are just as bad it is all political..

a reply to: anonentity
Canada got hit hard with doctors dying from the vaxx. Worse than here in the US.