It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Justoneman
originally posted by: jerryznv
a reply to: Maxmars
Number 2
The deadly impact of the COVID vaccines will become undeniable.
Are we pretending that the impact was ever deniable? There isn't a conspiratorial effort to "hide" anything here, only to reattribute the observable effects to anything other than the vaccine... not a conspiracy theory... that's marketing and public relations.
I like number two because it will be 100% one way or the other...either proved or disproved...there is no grey area or margin for error!
Secondly...I think this will also be the straw that breaks the camels back!!!
Yes that is why the apologist shills HAVE to keep pounding us with the lies and deflections. The tipping point appears near too for the big flush of public understanding what we have been analyzing here for years.
originally posted by: filthyphilanthropist
a reply to: network dude
In the past there ATS was predominantly esteemed persons with relevant fields of study. Literal rocket scientists, people deeply involved with mass telecommunications, various government employees, etc. Now ATS is full of simpletons like me.
Naturally, the depth of these threads sunk with the membership.
originally posted by: Justoneman
originally posted by: TzarChasm
a reply to: Maxmars
Number 7
We will discover the truth about the U.S.–Ukrainian partnership to research and develop bioweapons.
That discovery already happened and was quickly dismissed as more Russian propaganda. Very convenient to have a scapegoat whose nuclear capabilities are infinitely more spooky than the tangible, credible gain of function programs we keep shoving under the rug.
Have we now? I am open to what you have that proves that. It is still on the table that the Russians ARE white hats in this. Couple that with the big fat liars we have in our media paid to make lies look as if the truth and we have a reason to STEP BACK and ponder the lies as influencing our ability to listen to sources spouting them to us.
originally posted by: TzarChasm
a reply to: Maxmars
So your topic is trying to examine the examiner (apparently an author by the name of Ben Sellers) via the lens they have chosen to explore or at least summarize conspiracy culture and predict its next chapter?
none of this will happen