It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Asmodeus3
No. Not really. You seem to be getting upset but relax.
No. These stories are not usually covered on the MSM.
You shouldn't apologise for the vaccines and the MSM.
originally posted by: Itisnowagain
a reply to: tanstaafl
Do you have any links to share that make you believe this:
originally posted by: Asmodeus3
a reply to: tanstaafl
Not relevant to this thread but can you show us why let's say vegetarians or vegans are always at risk of developing CHD or other diseases
originally posted by: daskakik
originally posted by: Asmodeus3
No. Not really. You seem to be getting upset but relax.
Upset about what? I'm just explaining the point you seem to be having a hard time with.
No. These stories are not usually covered on the MSM.
This one was and you linked to proof of it. Why are you even trying to deny that?
You shouldn't apologise for the vaccines and the MSM.
Again, you seem to have the meaning of things confused.
Pointing out the fact that the MSM, shown by the link in your OP, did cover this story, isn't apologizing.
originally posted by: tanstaafl
originally posted by: Asmodeus3
a reply to: tanstaafl
Not relevant to this thread but can you show us why let's say vegetarians or vegans are always at risk of developing CHD or other diseases
You're right, this is OT, but the info is there if you're honestly searching for the truth.
Drs. KEn Berry and Anthony Chaffee on youtube are good places to start.
The story is too important to be missed.
originally posted by: daskakik
a reply to: Asmodeus3
I merely replied to a question someone else posted about the when of the story. Nobody forced you to participate in our little tangent.
The story is too important to be missed.
You seemed to have missed it until yesterday. Good thing the MSM still had it up, huh?
originally posted by: daskakik
a reply to: Asmodeus3
You can insist all you want, but the truth is that the thread was pretty much dead until a couple people stopped by to stir things up.
I guess you think you are on some crusade that is going to cause some important change. My advice would be that you should prepare for that not to be the case.
By the way, countering the claim that the MSM doesn't cover these stories in a thread about one that they did is still on topic because it is discussion about that story.
ETA: Also, it isn't making anyone miss it. If nothing else, it is keeping the thread on the recent posts page.
originally posted by: Asmodeus3
Me on a crusade? How did you come up with this?!
No need to give advise. I am ok and don't need it.
You seem to becoming increasingly frustrated with these threads and I wonder why?
If they don't like them then nobody forces you to be here. You see I never visit your threads (if you have created threads, I don't know). But you seem to be coming to mine...
originally posted by: daskakik
originally posted by: Asmodeus3
Me on a crusade? How did you come up with this?!
This "The topic is too important to be missed as I have already said." and this "I have made another one ..."
No need to give advise. I am ok and don't need it.
Gave it anyway.
You seem to becoming increasingly frustrated with these threads and I wonder why?
That is your imagination.
If they don't like them then nobody forces you to be here. You see I never visit your threads (if you have created threads, I don't know). But you seem to be coming to mine...
I don't create threads but have visited tons of them created by others here for over a decade. It is how I like to waste my time but that isn't the topic of the thread, is it?
originally posted by: Asmodeus3
What you do it's your own issue. I am simply not interested.
The topic is too important to be missed. I repeat. If you are trying to derail the conversation it doesn't work I am afraid. There are already 32 flags on this thread and numerous PMs.
If that want to play or waste your time as you say you can go somewhere else. I find it odd and strange you want to waste your time here and especially in this thread.
You have to get into terms with the fact that vaccines can cause serious injuries and deaths. No need for vaccine apologies.
originally posted by: Itisnowagain
They are also wasting your time.....
originally posted by: AaarghZombies
a reply to: Asmodeus3
OK people, take note.
What we have here is a named individual with an official coroner's report confirming their cause of death.
We have verified news reports, proof of life through social media, as well as names and places in public records.
Notice how different this is from 90 percent of what we get on this forum. This isn't a nameless friend of a friend wiry no social media accounts who died on an unknown date of the vax.
This is what an actual real instance looks like.
It's open, it's public, and it's not being covered up by anyone.
It's also exceedingly uncommon and proof that vax deaths are extremely rare.
We're not knee deep in dead.
originally posted by: daskakik
originally posted by: Itisnowagain
They are also wasting your time.....
This is mostly infotainment, so in a way we are all wasting our own and each other's time.
The thing is that some people don't realize this and that is why they insist something like the story in the OP is important and shouldn't be missed, over and over.
originally posted by: daskakik
a reply to: Asmodeus3
Whether you think it is or isn't a waste of time is irrelevant to it actually being a waste of time.
"Greatest medical scandal in history" yet somehow you expect readers to believe you don't think you are on a crusade? I mean, if for some reason you felt you were, that might explain why you don't think it is a waste of time.
originally posted by: daskakik
a reply to: Asmodeus3
Don't see the point of that post, you didn't really refute anything I said.