First real ufo stunning footage - they’re here!

a reply to: CHickMagNet5000

its from homeland security


also it came out super long ago so if it were messed with i think we have the tools and the eye to spot fakes, well some of us here do

also why would H.S fake it?

One should never be convinced, or believe anything.
It leaves you no headroom.

a reply to: Ophiuchus1

Why can’t aliens be tiny….requiring tiny ships?

If they are organic beings, their size cannot be random. Their size is basically defined by the size of their planet and by evolutionary forces, which defines a very specific range of sizes.

The evolutionary route that any species takes can only provide organs of a certain size and functionality to support a given body size. Your aliens cannot be shorter than 53.4 cm if you want them to be anthropomorphic, that is, human-like.

If you still want them to be really small and intelligent, then you must know that their home planet must still keep a dense enough atmosphere to keep liquid water on the planet, plus a substantial magnetic field to protect them from radiation. Additionally, the planet has to be big enough for the gravity to hold onto an atmosphere. Being aneorobic is useless because "anaerobic" means living or occurring in the absence of free oxygen, which still means you need an atmosphere. Given those conditions, the shortest beings you can expect will be just 48.6 cm. They would collapse if they ever try to step a foot on your planet. That's why fairies cannot exist: they all would die of aortic valve stenosis.

You can figure out creative solutions, such as liquid beings, or gelatinous, or insect-like, or ethereal beings made of gas. But then their intelligence must be swarm-based, collective, and in that case the design of the UFOs would not resemble anything you see.

In any case, they would die as soon as they set foot on this planet.

a reply to: Direne

Interesting…..

My use of “tiny” was subjective…….but if you calculated 48.6 cm as the smallest viable being possible due to conditions…..then 19.13 inches (converted) is plausible as a size of being that would fit in a 3 ft craft which is thought to be that size in the Aquadilla Puerto Rico Incident.

👽

a reply to: Ophiuchus1

Yes, a being that would be what they call on Earth "a human dwarf" could well pilot a ship. All its biological functions would be assured and it could live without problems on Earth, but only for that reason: because it would be a human.

The problem is that the form that a living being adopts is an evolutionary solution to a concrete and specific environmental problem that we cannot expect to be identical on all planets. A small change in the atmosphere, a slightly higher or lower concentration in the composition of water or in the amount of UV rays is enough to differentiate beings in a dramatic way.

And that is precisely the problem with aliens: they look too much like humans to be plausible.

a reply to: Direne

I could imagine people this short, being genetically bred this short (under 3ft) and trained to Pilot small craft from Black projects. Perhaps at these compact sizes, they’re able to handle greater G-Forces….



After all…..we breed dogs down to teacup sizes

👽

originally posted by: CthulhuMythos
To me it's shape looks lumpy, could it be a meteor/chunk of rock from space? When it goes in and out the water it could be like a stone skipping the water surface and when it splits in two the seem to have the same profile which would happen if a rock chunk split in half (maybe due to the impact of the water) and then it disappears, into the water? It's size also suggests it could be a rock chunk rather than a space ship.

Here's a pretty interesting explanation of it being a lensing effect: 27:10 to 30:30