It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Man gets NT$400,000 payout for adverse COVID-19 vaccine reaction

page: 1
6

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 11 2022 @ 02:21 PM
link   
focustaiwan.tw...

Taiwan
15/10/2022


A man in his 60s who developed capillary leak syndrome after receiving the AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine has been awarded NT$400,000 (US$12,509) in compensation by the government's Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP).

The man, surnamed Chang (張), was the first person to be compensated due to developing the rare capillary disorder, according to meeting minutes published by the VICP Saturday.

Capillary leak syndrome, a potentially fatal condition capable of causing organ failure, occurs when plasma in an individual's blood leaks out of capillaries into surrounding tissues.

Meanwhile, the VICP also decided that an individual with a history of asthma who experienced an acute asthma attack 30 minutes after being vaccinated with the AstraZeneca vaccine should receive NT$20,000 in compensation.

Another individual who developed complications of thrombocytopenia, a rare blood-clotting condition, 15 days after receiving the AstraZeneca vaccine was awarded NT$20,000 in compensation.

The VICP panel also declared that two individuals who suffered an adverse reaction to the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine should receive NT$50,000 and NT$10,000, respectively, in compensation



A total of 5 more cases of Taiwanese citizens, including the case covered in the article, have been compensated as they suffered adverse reactions from the Astrazeneca and Moderna vaccines.

One of them developed thrombocytopenia 2 weeks after receiving the Astrazeneca vaccine, one had an Asthma attack 30 minutes after getting vaccinated with the Astrazeneca vaccine, and another two had unspecified adverse reaction after getting vaccinated with the Moderna vaccine.

It looks there are several of these events although not every claim made is approved as it has to meet certain criteria. The cases that are approved are obviously less than the cases not approved but this doesn't mean there were no injuries suffered in the non-approved cases.

We can see the politics again in play as the panel was allegedly unable to say definitely, if the man who developed the capillary leaked syndrome was due to the vaccine, but they have decided to award compensation as if something walks like a duck and quacks like a duck then it must be a duck.


edit on 11-12-2022 by Asmodeus3 because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 11 2022 @ 02:32 PM
link   
a reply to: Asmodeus3

It will be scrubbed soon I would wager, just like the powers that be scrubbed Taiwan's warnings when the outbreak started.

Cant piss off that country you know they might stop funding us.



posted on Dec, 11 2022 @ 02:36 PM
link   
Impossible, vaccines only cause sunshine and rainbows and are 17000% effective at preventing covid.



posted on Dec, 11 2022 @ 02:56 PM
link   
a reply to: Asmodeus3

Here is where they went wrong with the “vaccine”
At least in the US.

Everyone should be able to sue if they are injured. All vaccines, even “safe” medicines have adverse reactions to some people.

People should have never, ever been fired or threatened to get vaccinated.

It should have remained a choice, with people being told there are possibilities of adverse reactions.
Then let people decide for themselves.



posted on Dec, 11 2022 @ 03:05 PM
link   

originally posted by: JAGStorm
a reply to: Asmodeus3

Here is where they went wrong with the “vaccine”
At least in the US.

Everyone should be able to sue if they are injured. All vaccines, even “safe” medicines have adverse reactions to some people.

People should have never, ever been fired or threatened to get vaccinated.

It should have remained a choice, with people being told there are possibilities of adverse reactions.
Then let people decide for themselves.



Totally agree with you.

Science isn't accomplished with coercion, pressure, intimidation, harassment, fear & terror, and threats of dismissal by employers. The campaign has failed massively and the claims there are many who have been vaccinated are just absurd and ludicrous given the way the vaccination campaign tried to convince the public.

If it wasn't for the fear & terror through the MSM, the pressure and coercion, and the threats of dismissal, there would have been many less willing to inject themselves with these untested and potentially hazardous products, if also knew what kind of adverse reactions these products have.



posted on Dec, 11 2022 @ 03:10 PM
link   

originally posted by: Asmodeus3

originally posted by: JAGStorm
a reply to: Asmodeus3

Here is where they went wrong with the “vaccine”
At least in the US.

Everyone should be able to sue if they are injured. All vaccines, even “safe” medicines have adverse reactions to some people.

People should have never, ever been fired or threatened to get vaccinated.

It should have remained a choice, with people being told there are possibilities of adverse reactions.
Then let people decide for themselves.



Totally agree with you.

Science isn't accomplished with coercion, pressure, intimidation, harassment, fear & terror, and threats of dismissal by employers. The campaign has failed massively and the claims there are many who have been vaccinated are just absurd and ludicrous given the way the vaccination campaign tried to convince the public.

If it wasn't for the fear & terror through the MSM, the pressure and coercion, and the threats of dismissal, there would have been many less willing to inject themselves with these untested and potentially hazardous products, if also knew what kind of adverse reactions these products have.


WELL SAID



posted on Dec, 11 2022 @ 03:15 PM
link   

originally posted by: musicismagic

originally posted by: Asmodeus3

originally posted by: JAGStorm
a reply to: Asmodeus3

Here is where they went wrong with the “vaccine”
At least in the US.

Everyone should be able to sue if they are injured. All vaccines, even “safe” medicines have adverse reactions to some people.

People should have never, ever been fired or threatened to get vaccinated.

It should have remained a choice, with people being told there are possibilities of adverse reactions.
Then let people decide for themselves.



Totally agree with you.

Science isn't accomplished with coercion, pressure, intimidation, harassment, fear & terror, and threats of dismissal by employers. The campaign has failed massively and the claims there are many who have been vaccinated are just absurd and ludicrous given the way the vaccination campaign tried to convince the public.

If it wasn't for the fear & terror through the MSM, the pressure and coercion, and the threats of dismissal, there would have been many less willing to inject themselves with these untested and potentially hazardous products, if also knew what kind of adverse reactions these products have.


WELL SAID


Merci beaucoup!



posted on Dec, 11 2022 @ 04:28 PM
link   
It looks like Taiwan is compensating a range of individuals who had suffered adverse reactions from the vaccines. But there needs to be some comparisons on the proportion of claims approved in each country. We can then draw some useful conclusions from it.
edit on 11-12-2022 by Asmodeus3 because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 12 2022 @ 03:18 AM
link   
rarediseases.org...


Systemic capillary leak syndrome (SCLS) is a rare disorder characterized by acute and severe recurrent attacks associated with a rapid fall in blood pressure as a result of fluid leaks from smaller vessels called capillaries. Attacks often last several days and require emergency care. They are sometimes life threatening. SCLS occurs most often in adults and the disease is very rare in children.


This is one of the syndromes and conditions associated with the Astrazeneca Covid-19 vaccine.



posted on Dec, 15 2022 @ 04:02 PM
link   
Again, the compensation of $12,509 for this very serious condition which could be fatal seems not to provide justice to the victim of this untested, unsafe, and potentially hazardous products. The compensation should have been much higher.




top topics



 
6

log in

join