The UFO Bubble Goes Pop

a reply to: Maxmars

I don't feel that "we're losing."

By losing, I only mean in terms of finding out what the UFOs are, why they're here, and what they want, etc.

I don’t see any gain there at all.

I trust former Congressman/Director of National Intelligence, JOHN RATCLIFFE.

He said UFOs scare the military/intel community: www.abovetopsecret.com...

He also says the FBI is using Social Media to cover up Biden family crimes.

I trust John Ratcliffe.

The boring thing about UFO's is the F. The O is at least debatable, and the only thing that makes the U interesting.

The bad thing of UAP's is the A, that leaves out the most interesting part, and the P, that assumes that the O in UFO has been resolved, when in fact it has not.

What people don’t want to accept is that it’s the phenomenon that is running the show. There in control.
In other words, they are the subject, the one doing something to something else—that’s us: the earth, humans and this world, and the skies and seas, and our earth's environment are the object ---that Is that which is operated upon.

We are the yin, and they are the yang.

There are no big cases or flaps lately, then it’s because the phenomenon hasn’t done anything to cause a flap or big event.

At best, all that can be done is maintain Mufon-type monitoring of the events. Communications like this forum.
And the new UAP groups can get their super cameras and monitor the skies….

That’s about it

Oh…and of course, the exotic UFO tribe and the more sober UFO acolytes can continue their various and alternating extrapolations of UFO phenomenon…past, present, and future in that continuing circle of communicative speculations.

I repeat, we must accept it as a yin thing to the phenomenon’s yang. Then in time, knowledge might flow the way we can recognize it.

I know we all want something significant to happen along these lines, but we have to be patient. It will likely come soon enough.

Of course,
Time...
will tell
As time, in the end, tells all things

a reply to: peaceinoutz

I agree that the phenomenon (phenomena) controls the community. It is as it should be.

But your use of 'yin and yang' may be (in my opinion only, of course) misplaced.

I understand the gist of your sentiment. And I don't refute it. But to me it seems that the essential idea behind yin and yang doesn't lend itself to the phenomenology, per se. Yin and Yang are representations of principles which contain, within themselves, a polarity of understanding (I admit I may be incorrect.) Just picking nits... you'll get little contradiction from me.

a reply to: Maxmars

No problem.

I’m speaking yin and yang in a colloquial sense—not in any literal sense.

We are passive to the phenomena( ufo events), and they are active regarding it.

I agree that the phenomenon (phenomena) controls the community.

I don’t say they control the community, though on a small scale, maybe sometimes…

I mean to say they control the Ufo events.


But your point is well taken. Yin and yang, like all polarity concepts, aren't absolute.

There is a yin in the yang and a yang in the yin...

In this regard, though, our yang is undeveloped. And revolves around running away, observation, and rumination.

The material that needs believing is vastly outnumbering materials that prove that no belief is necessary. What irrefutable and publicly available evidences are available to support this topic enough to validate its existence? Without something physical, real and tangible this entire subject has no more value than any other form of fictional entertainment.