U.S. personnel now in Ukraine

The pentagon had a briefing Monday morning and acknowledged that we now, do in fact have boots on the ground in Ukraine.

With the recent increase in rhetoric from Russia blaming the U.K. Navy for Nordstream and claims of the U.K. Navy assisting with the Crimea bridge sabotage things appear to be hearing up quickly. Now add U.S. admittance of having personnel in Ukraine and it looks like we are getting setup for NATO involvement.

It was just a matter of time before it all goes down. Joe and Hunters involvement with oil companies in the Ukraine really helped sow the seeds for all of thisand it looks like Joe will lead us into world war in order to protect their Ukrainian assets.



Source:

americanmilitarynews.com...

a reply to: Timucuan

It's more likely that this will end in a United States operation, not NATO. According to the article, US forces have recently entered Ukraine to assess and inspect weapons deliveries from the US.

When asked what the U.S. Department of Defense personnel could do inside the Ukraine, the defense official said DoD personnel are assessing various equipment needs but “otherwise, our role is to support our civilian agency counterparts if they should request our assistance as they support the Ukrainians.”

I can see it now; red wave next week, too deep to avoid direct conflict and the headlines will read

"Republicans Get Us In Another War Again! "

a reply to: Timucuan

Ben Wallace has been 'visiting' Ukraine every year since 2014................... Now we get US personnel, it's all pre planned. Ukraine is a puppet of the West through it's coup installed government. Oh and by the way, read this..........................................

You couln't make it up.............Afghan special forces trained up by the Anglos now fighting for Russia in Ukraine! www.theguardian.com... "Afghan special forces soldiers who fought alongside American troops and then fled to Iran after the chaotic US withdrawal last year are now being recruited by the Russian military to fight in Ukraine, three former Afghan generals have told the Associated Press.

They said the Russians want to attract thousands of the former elite Afghan commandos into a “foreign legion” with offers of steady, $1,500-a-month payments and promises of safe havens for themselves and their families so they can avoid deportation home to what many assume would be death at the hands of the Taliban."

We have had a small contingent in Ukraine for decades. It's not new information, just new to those people who have recently discovered it. They aren't armed. They are usually instructors teaching the Ukranians how to use advanced systems such as HIMARS. We also have a small contingent in Russia.

a reply to: Timucuan



They WANT war, they NEED war.

Not Russia, the lefties....

a reply to: Timucuan

If Congress did not approve this, we can add another reason on the pile of reasons for impeaching Joe biden.

a reply to: carewemust

when did congress get constitutional authority to deploy the military? you know the president is the commander and chief...

Ukraine should be left to it’s demise of being a corrupted country for as long as I can remember. They aren’t part of NATO, they had bio weapons labs on the border of Russia, their leader is coc aine addict, and it’s just a safe haven for corrupt western politicians to do back door deals through their family members. We’ve sent them a 100 billion dollars and they can’t even account for it.

To top it off, Ukraine poked the bear repeatedly and Russia started playing Ukraines game. So I say go Russia I guess but who really cares anyways? All I can think of is Europe, but they’ve been selling out to Russia for a while now, playing both sides with the US and Russia. In the end, I really hope the US pulls out of NATO, stop being the world police and let all these countries fend for themselves.

a reply to: schuyler

The US has a small contingent in Russia, really? What would they be doing there?

originally posted by: LouisCypher
a reply to: carewemust

when did congress get constitutional authority to deploy the military? you know the president is the commander and chief...

We're not at war with Russia. So, if Biden is putting troops in harm's way in the hope of getting us into a war, then that would be an act of treason.

originally posted by: LouisCypher
a reply to: carewemust

when did congress get constitutional authority to deploy the military? you know the president is the commander and chief...

War powers resolution , it’s not up to President

a reply to: Bishop2199

Well the US did create NATO meant to keep Russia and Germans down while keeping the US in Europe.

I dont see how good or great long term this would be.

Yesterday Biden referred to high gas prices being a fault of being at war. Hmmm 😀

originally posted by: AndyFromMichigan
We're not at war with Russia. So, if Biden is putting troops in harm's way in the hope of getting us into a war, then that would be an act of treason.

the president can put troops anywhere hes the commander and chief and considering were not at war with russia congress wouldnt even be consulted...

originally posted by: Enduro
War powers resolution , it’s not up to President

tell that to every president since ww2...

a reply to: ufoorbhunter
"They said the Russians want to attract thousands of the former elite Afghan commandos into a “foreign legion” with offers of steady, $1,500-a-month payments "

I am sure that money will be paid in a reliable manner.

The russian soldiers and volunteers have been complaining of not getting paid(or fed,or armed)since day one,but I am sure Putin will make sure these Afghans who he wants as more cannon meat will get juicy paychecks on time.


I bet most Afghans would refuse to fight for Russia anyway,if they know their history.

a reply to: MykeNukem

I keep mentioning this point.

US currently has around 700+ bases in the world and in Europe.

The biggest embassy constructed in Iraq most recently and the US still refers baghdad as a Green Zone.

a reply to: Silcone Synapse

I bet most Afghans would refuse to fight for Russia anyway,if they know their history.

How many would be willing to fight for the US/NATO side? considering after 20 years of US bombing their villages pretending that they had being bombing villages due over terrorists in the area.

Majority of Afghans no longer trust the US.

originally posted by: AndyFromMichigan

originally posted by: LouisCypher
a reply to: carewemust

when did congress get constitutional authority to deploy the military? you know the president is the commander and chief...

We're not at war with Russia. So, if Biden is putting troops in harm's way in the hope of getting us into a war, then that would be an act of treason.

He wants to move at least $85 Billion worth of equipment to Russia.

Then...abandon it there and pull out...