Robert Bigelow said "aliens are right under people's noses"

originally posted by: drewlander
a reply to: Ophiuchus1

I just took a quick peek and so far they are all "dicyanin style" which contain a "synthetic compound" that mimics the properties of how dicyanin dye filters light or something. Ill keep my eyes peeled, but honestly, if i did find authentic dicyanin goggles i wouldnt have any way to prove they were real....

….”Ill keep my eyes peeled”….kind of a pun ‘seeing’ the subject matter at hand 😉

Anyway…..I would probably make sure, any goggles find, are pre-ban dated in manufacturing, IF possible. Or since true Dicyanin is banned in the US….perhaps not in the rest of the world. So, other countries may still sell authentic Dicyanin eyewear. The trick is getting them sent to you if you live in the US.

Good Luck 🍀

BTW…..here is the Dicyanin website Official Aura Glasses …..what’s written in the tabs are interesting. The contact is in the UK.

For those who don’t know…..here’s a quick breakdown of the Dicyanin effect….



Perhaps this Dicyanin effect is a way of essentially making a person simulate colorblindness.

It is said that animals are colorblind…like dogs see only in shades of gray.

Dogs have been thought to not only sense but also “see” anomalies in the Paranormal world.

Do we know if naturally colorblind people see unusual anomalies? Has that been studied?

Hmmmm

What if there is a way to produce a molecularly charged chemical compound to coat lenses so that it blocks out 95% or more of the color spectrum (like Dicyanin) but leaving only the Infrared (an Ultra-Red??) band to see into…….what wonders could be seen…if any.



Possibly even achieving what soldiers were seeing using the Red color spectrum effect night-vision scopes of Vietnam!

👽

a reply to: mirageman

You make some excellent points. He knows quite a bit he's not sharing.

It's not about light. Light is just a visual medium. All of these "things", aliens, UFOs, different animals etc. when they appear in our world they are solid physical objects. I couldn't guess what it might be, maybe sound or vibrations, but I think it's something electrical/mechanical, it is not natural.

I agree we are being experimented with and have been for a long time. As I've said, They (if I could call them they) are intelligent as the modus operandi confirms this. But why? The overall important question for all of it is HOW? How do they do it because if we could do it then we could visit them for the answers.

A question for any medics on ATS. One of the mysteries of people returned who are dead and coroners cannot find any punctures, wounds, drugs or any physical forms of death. Though we kill murderers by electrocution (which leaves marks) think on this:- the brain is an electrical system, doctors identify death as no electrical brain activity, brain dead, what if they could just stop the electrical brain. Not over electrifying like executions, but just stop electrical activity. The question then would be if they could do that medically it would look like a natural death, no marks, no residue.

Dogs are Deuteranopia (red-green color blindness).They see some colours washed out thats all.
Dog Vision

I think Bigelow is hiding that he has found nothing real to prove any UFO aliens are here. All he has is testimony, like all of us, despite the mucho dinero he has spent on the subject for whatever reason.

As for the paranormal, many of us believe or even know it's real on many levels, but one can only know one own experience until it becomes something akin to what we know as scientific.


If he's that certain then where is the beef?
Or in this case, wheres is the nose?

originally posted by: NobodySpecial268
a reply to: 38181

The vid kinda stuck in my mind too for some reason.

I would take a look through the goggles, both red and yellow just to see if it's true and what "they" look like. Just a peek. Though the video said some of the the folks who wore them ended up temporarily in psych wards.

Perhaps we should drop "aliens" and "demons", and just say; the neighbors . . .

I was one who used a pair of those night vision goggles in training in the early 80's. They were the older design and not the new "starscope" sensors. The goggles at that time were infrared and if someone else had a pair on you could see their beacon from their goggles. The Army was demonstrating to us the new Starscope variety and showing us the difference. Starscopes made the personnel wearing one able to avoid being seen by someone wearing the old ones.

I recall not only seeing the soldiers, but that you could make out their clothes with readable name patches, rank and they were green. Did not see any thing unusual if that wasn't unusual enough. Maybe, I was in the wrong place to see demons with those? I don't recall a single one of my Army buds saying they had either. Perhaps if all this is true, then the newer model I was using in the 80's might have found a way to keep the demons hidden form plain sight.

a reply to: Justoneman

Ahh, so the infra red ones were like a torch that used normally invisible frequencies. I bet a lot were thrown out when the new ones came in : )

I recall not only seeing the soldiers, but that you could make out their clothes with readable name patches, rank and they were green. Did not see any thing unusual if that wasn't unusual enough. Maybe, I was in the wrong place to see demons with those? I don't recall a single one of my Army buds saying they had either. Perhaps if all this is true, then the newer model I was using in the 80's might have found a way to keep the demons hidden form plain sight.

Well, we have only got the discussion in the video to go on really as far as seeing "demons" is concerned. I find the idea of "demon glasses" interesting to explore. Personally I think it could be done. Who knows what was achieved from the 1850s onwards.

In the video the discussion said the trial was for a limited time and improvements were made so unneccessary "artifacts" were removed from sight.

a reply to: Ophiuchus1

I saw what ya did with that OUIJA gif : )

a reply to: Ophiuchus1

That PDF is interesting. The section you suggested reminds me of some of the work with colour therapy, especially Irlen Syndrome.

Irlen Syndrome is commonly defined as a perceptual processing disorder, suggesting that the brain is unable to properly process visual information from the eyes because of sensitivity to certain wavelengths of light.

I sometimes get the pattern recognition problems where, for instance the pattern of corrugated iron sheets startsmoving.

There are also the "blue blocker" glasses they designed for kids to get them to settle down at night and sleep. I have a few pairs of those. They increase melatonin levels for sleeping. Blue apparently suppresses melatonin.

So yeah, there is room for considering what looking at a brightly monochrome coloured screen does to the brain's chemestry when used for long periods of time.

I have the Irlen syndrome and used to get super stressed out when the supermarket put in a new "enhanced" display lighting. Mercury vapour industrial lights are like a weight. Walking under them used to make me feel so heavy.

For those who use night vision optics, especially if they were light sensitive, I would not be surprised if the stress eventually led to a psychotic break or other psychological problems.

.

a reply to: JAGStorm


You know, I have told a few people about this, but....

My Dad passed away in 2014. Him and I used to talk about aliens all the time. He was a believer, and I have seen things that prevent me from not believing.

The night he passed, I had a dream of him. He was younger, smiling, and happy. He put his arm around me and was directing me to go somewhere. Apparently to show me something, I felt.

But, I woke up right when he started to show me.

I honestly feel like he was going to show me the truth, and I was prevented from seeing it.

originally posted by: Justoneman

originally posted by: NobodySpecial268
a reply to: 38181

The vid kinda stuck in my mind too for some reason.

I would take a look through the goggles, both red and yellow just to see if it's true and what "they" look like. Just a peek. Though the video said some of the the folks who wore them ended up temporarily in psych wards.

Perhaps we should drop "aliens" and "demons", and just say; the neighbors . . .

I was one who used a pair of those night vision goggles in training in the early 80's. They were the older design and not the new "starscope" sensors. The goggles at that time were infrared and if someone else had a pair on you could see their beacon from their goggles. The Army was demonstrating to us the new Starscope variety and showing us the difference. Starscopes made the personnel wearing one able to avoid being seen by someone wearing the old ones.

I recall not only seeing the soldiers, but that you could make out their clothes with readable name patches, rank and they were green. Did not see any thing unusual if that wasn't unusual enough. Maybe, I was in the wrong place to see demons with those? I don't recall a single one of my Army buds saying they had either. Perhaps if all this is true, then the newer model I was using in the 80's might have found a way to keep the demons hidden form plain sight.

I don’t think those were the same as the video. I’ve been using the current issued ones, basically unchanged since the 90’s. They too see IR, since we use something that will light up a target, essentially it’s a IR flashlight, so we can see what’s being flashed with our nvg’s on without giving us all away with visible light. Those little square things on the Army camouflage are IR reflectors. Marines don’t have them, they are smart enough not to be a target.

originally posted by: NobodySpecial268
a reply to: Justoneman

Ahh, so the infra red ones were like a torch that used normally invisible frequencies. I bet a lot were thrown out when the new ones came in : )

I recall not only seeing the soldiers, but that you could make out their clothes with readable name patches, rank and they were green. Did not see any thing unusual if that wasn't unusual enough. Maybe, I was in the wrong place to see demons with those? I don't recall a single one of my Army buds saying they had either. Perhaps if all this is true, then the newer model I was using in the 80's might have found a way to keep the demons hidden form plain sight.

Well, we have only got the discussion in the video to go on really as far as seeing "demons" is concerned. I find the idea of "demon glasses" interesting to explore. Personally I think it could be done. Who knows what was achieved from the 1850s onwards.

In the video the discussion said the trial was for a limited time and improvements were made so unneccessary "artifacts" were removed from sight.

I would say that would be something they would scramble to make sure they correct as fast as possible if it were true. IDK, I am open to the possibilities here. There are definitely things that exist outside of human perception starting with atoms we learn about in Science classes. We have to devise ways to "see" in different frequencies and other dynamic things we are learning exist as we build our knowledge base in this iteration of Human society. Typing that line made me think maybe we have been here a few times and failed or that 12,000 year cycle hit critical.

To me the Holy Grail of UFOlogy is understanding why sightings take place at specific places. Like what is unique to those places.

Can anybody give help and advice on this one please...................

This thing called called Dicyanin, is it natural?

Can it be found within the Earth at certain places?

Can it rise to the surface in those places?

Red lights or lenses were great to preserve your night vision for star gazing or Astronomy.

a reply to: Justoneman

We have to devise ways to "see" in different frequencies and other dynamic things we are learning exist as we build our knowledge base in this iteration of Human society.

Typing that line made me think maybe we have been here a few times and failed or that 12,000 year cycle hit critical.

I get that feeling too.

The idea that we can build lenses that see into "demon world" I think, is probably the last thing most people want to see happen. People might turn to government, military and religion to demand they solve the problem. What happens if the government and clergy can't do a thing to protect people from "them"?

Christianity has a lot to say about "demons" "war in heaven" and "fallen angels". One must keep the eyes firmly on Jesus and god.
The Bhuddists say "don't look there" - keep your eyes on Buddha.
The Vedas had their war between the Devas and the Asuras.

The Koran has an interesting chapter on the Jinn who are said to have been made from smokeless fire:

In the second verse the jinn recant their belief in false gods and venerate Muhammad for his monotheism. The jinn apologize for their past blasphemy and criticize mankind for either neglecting them or encouraging their disbelief.

Source: Al-Jinn ~ wikipedia

"In the second verse the jinn recant their belief in false gods and venerate Muhammad for his monotheism. The jinn apologize for their past blasphemy" - that sounds to me like diplomacy to bring an end to conflict ~ as stated: an apology. The second part is certainly not an apology.

". . . . and criticize mankind for either neglecting them or encouraging their disbelief."

a reply to: ufoorbhunter

I have read that dicyanin is found in coal tar. It can also be synthesised apparently.

From: Synthesis of photosensitizing dyes Dicyanine

The photosensitizing dyes (derived from quinoline) in use prior to 1919 were of four general types: isocyanines sensitizing to green and yellow, cyanines and pinacyanols both sensitizing to orange and red, and dicyanines, which extend the sensitiveness of the plate to, or even beyond 9000 A (me: 'A' for angstroms?). The dye of this last type which from the point both of preparation and use, we have found the most satisfactory is that termed "Dicyanin A".

We have prepared this dye by the action of sodium methylate (or ethylate) in absolute methyl (or ethyl) alcoholic solution., in the presence of air, on 2,4-dimethyl-6-ethoxy-quinoline ethnitrate, obtained by the action of silver nitrate on ethiodide of the same base. The base is prepared from p-phenetidine by condensation with paraldehyde and acetone.

The coresponding dicyanin A iodide is more difficult to use in the plate-staining bath, but has better keeping qualities.

The text then goes on on how to make the stuff in a chemestry lab.

Interestingly, they are talking about photo-sensitising chemicals used in photography. I did read another paper that described using dicyanin as a microscope light filter. the way it was used was to focus the microscope on the target over and over, and then to look with the eye at a bright light through the filter over and over, then refocus through the microscope. And so on.

So using dicyanin seems to be a photo sensitisation thing. Dicyanine being blue apparently makes the sight sensitive to deep red. If I understood correctly: which extend the sensitiveness of the plate to, or even beyond 9000 A.

If one searches "dicyanin" on google, they use it in stellar photography still. Amazon has a book called 'Application of Dicyanin to the Photography of Stellar Spectra'.

To the eye a continuous spectrum is usually terminated at the red end, not by the lack of energy but by the ineffectiveness of the longer waves in producing vision. ~ from said book which can be found on Amazon.

Hope that helps in some way ufoorbhunter.

a reply to: NobodySpecial268

So many thanks for that help advice NobodySpecial268, I'll give this some thought this afternoon. Coal tar, wow! I was hoping for limestone grit but nevermind, maybe there's coal everywhere beneath the surface geology. Fascinating stuff

a reply to: ufoorbhunter

No probs.

You in Australia out of interest?

originally posted by: NobodySpecial268
a reply to: ufoorbhunter

No probs.

You in Australia out of interest?

Wish I was. In the motherland..................... Great Britain

Some more on dicyanin from the 'Archives Of The Roentgen Ray'.

The Shifting of the Chromatic Focus of the Eye by the Use of a Dicyanin Screen

It is a purchased article, yet the page allowed is interesting.