It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Nevercompromise
I think you are implying you were pretty even without makeup
But what if you were ugly?
I consider it witchcraft myself.
I like little to zero makeup myself.
I like honesty
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: Nevercompromise
I think you are implying you were pretty even without makeup
But what if you were ugly?
I consider it witchcraft myself.
I like little to zero makeup myself.
I like honesty
Well, it is me in my avatar. When I was in my 20s.
But I've seen many physically homely men and women -- pull off an aura of beautiful by their essence and presentation of self.
Witchcraft? That's an interesting take.
I think everyone is who their brain tells them they are.
originally posted by: Nevercompromise
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: Nevercompromise
I think you are implying you were pretty even without makeup
But what if you were ugly?
I consider it witchcraft myself.
I like little to zero makeup myself.
I like honesty
Well, it is me in my avatar. When I was in my 20s.
But I've seen many physically homely men and women -- pull off an aura of beautiful by their essence and presentation of self.
Witchcraft? That's an interesting take.
Your answer came off as pretentious.
I am posting off my phone and cannot see your avatar.
But you avoided my question which all the rest was a setup for.
But what if you are ugly underneath all the makeup?
I would and do consider that witchcraft.
Make yourself look like you are pretty when you are not.
False advertising.
Witchcraft.
The thing I like most about women is how their countenance makes them more beautiful as they age and makeup only covers up external flaws.
originally posted by: Direne
a reply to: Annee
I think everyone is who their brain tells them they are.
I agree, but this just works perfectly for the individual in isolation. That's a must to build a personality, and a 'self'.
Now, the problem arises when you put the person into a society, that is, when the myriad people in that society interact with each other. Once exposed to others, you are certainly what you think you are, plus what the others think you are.
And yet, that's not the end of the story: in between what you think you are and what the others think you are lies the realm of who you really are.
It is a complex situation because being human is complex; it is complex because a human brain is complex; and it is extremely complex because human brains do interact with other equally complex brains. Being whoever one wishes to be is easy when one is the only inhabitant in the island, but when you interact with other people everything changes: personality is diluted, sometimes pathologically. That's what it means to be a social being. You never judge a person for what he/she thinks she/he is. You judge a person for what you think she/he is. A damaged brain never hates someone for what he/she is, rather it hates him/her for what it thinks he/she is.
Judging others should be based on what they do, not on what they are.
Rejecting others for what one thinks they are is clearly a primitive non-evolved behavior. Anyway, I never saw a lesbian, a gay, a transgender, a non-binary, an asexual, or a heterosexual being. I always saw persons.
It is the moment they act that I can clearly distinguish beasts from human beings, and I react accordingly. Once you see the look of hatred in the eyes of the person in front of you, you know it is not a person, but a beast.
originally posted by: Annee
It doesn't bother me. Seems reasonable -- what else would you call it
As I tell my grandson, "People are their heart".
Look past the physical and straight to who they are as a person.
originally posted by: Xtrozero
originally posted by: Annee
It doesn't bother me. Seems reasonable -- what else would you call it
As I tell my grandson, "People are their heart".
Look past the physical and straight to who they are as a person.
Well it doesn't piss me off either, but it seems it has to other women. You pick and choose your battles too.
originally posted by: Annee
Oh, so you question gender equality in sports.
Me too. I don't think we're there yet. Male and female bodies are structured differently.
Not everything is equal.
I have researched it -- have you?
originally posted by: Xtrozero
Oh, so you question gender equality in sports.
Why are they a woman and not a transwoman? The left can not even explain what a woman is today and so end up being a movement of Misogyny against biological woman who disagree in the slightest. Even lesbians were attacked when they expressed they would not have a sexual relationship with a transwoman. Its not just sports, we saw that first woman four-star admiral is actually a man. It would have been laughable to imagine that Bruce Jenner would one day be selected as Glamour‘s Woman of the Year immediately after posing in lingerie on the cover of Vanity Fair.
I don't have issues with the term trans and that is where these people should stay, but I do have issues with everything that makes up a woman become marginalized just because the woman with a penis does have all that too.
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: Xtrozero
originally posted by: Annee
It doesn't bother me. Seems reasonable -- what else would you call it
As I tell my grandson, "People are their heart".
Look past the physical and straight to who they are as a person.
Well it doesn't piss me off either, but it seems it has to other women. You pick and choose your battles too.
Insecure women?
Seriously, I tried to think of how this affected me in any way. It doesn't.
So, to me, it's manufactured outrage.
originally posted by: Nevercompromise
That is unfair to claim those are insecure women. That is just a simple opinion that would be almost impossible to qualify.
I can make a better case that insecure women need to wear makeup when they go out in public
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: Xtrozero
originally posted by: Annee
It doesn't bother me. Seems reasonable -- what else would you call it
As I tell my grandson, "People are their heart".
Look past the physical and straight to who they are as a person.
Well it doesn't piss me off either, but it seems it has to other women. You pick and choose your battles too.
Insecure women?
Seriously, I tried to think of how this affected me in any way. It doesn't.
So, to me, it's manufactured outrage.
Insecure women?
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: Nevercompromise
That is unfair to claim those are insecure women. That is just a simple opinion that would be almost impossible to qualify.
I can make a better case that insecure women need to wear makeup when they go out in public
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: Xtrozero
originally posted by: Annee
It doesn't bother me. Seems reasonable -- what else would you call it
As I tell my grandson, "People are their heart".
Look past the physical and straight to who they are as a person.
Well it doesn't piss me off either, but it seems it has to other women. You pick and choose your battles too.
Insecure women?
Seriously, I tried to think of how this affected me in any way. It doesn't.
So, to me, it's manufactured outrage.
I'm def not insecure.
I like playing dress up. Because it's fun.
I cannot see any genuine reason women should be outraged by the video in the OP.