Amphibious assault ship USS Kearsarge was located from the site of the alleged sabotage

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0

originally posted by: MidnightWatcher

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0

originally posted by: dollukka
a reply to: v1rtu0s0

Pipeline was stopped by Russia, Europe´s reply was that russian gas can be replaced with other sources which they pretty much did. So the pipeline came useless for Russia, but sabotaging it will give Russia an excuse to "guard" it with russian navy and interfere to all marine traffic in Baltic Sea, makes sense does it ? We´ll see

So Russia satbotaged their own pipeline after the US warned they would take it down earlier this year?

I'm just trying to understand the logic. Now Russia can say we did it so they can declare war?

Couldn't they have done something else less elaborate? It's getting pretty confusing.

It is not "russia's pipeline".

So it wasn't Russia?

Not what I said.

russia does not own the pipeline.

Or even know how to operate and maintain it.

a reply to: Creep Thumper

The US has navy seals and this Amphibious assault ship USS Kearsarge was located from the site of the alleged sabotage says a lot.

You would rather believe the same gov that told you lies about the baby incubators during the first Iraqi war.

Even Still the big loser is Europe and Germany.

a reply to: vNex92

Whereas you would rather believe that the sun shines out of Putin's bottom.

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: vNex92

Whereas you would rather believe that the sun shines out of Putin's bottom.

Wait, so you're saying Putin did it?

a reply to: v1rtu0s0

Did what?

Shine out of his bottom?

originally posted by: vNex92
Even Still the big loser is Europe and Germany.

Because they can no longer buy gas that they don't want until the pipeline is repaired?

a reply to: vNex92

Kearsarge doesn’t normally carry Seals. They carry a Marine Expeditionary Unit. Contrary to what you would have people believe, the Navy isn’t stupid. They aren’t going to park a ship right on top of where they just sabotaged something. If they did it, it was done with a sub, or using other undetectable means. There aren’t many navies in the world that are going to carry out a large scale sabotage mission with the ship doing it sitting in plain sight right on top of something that just blew up.

originally posted by: vNex92
a reply to: Creep Thumper

The US has navy seals and this Amphibious assault ship USS Kearsarge was located from the site of the alleged sabotage says a lot.

You would rather believe the same gov that told you lies about the baby incubators during the first Iraqi war.

No, I doubt that we would operate in the open when we have more covert and proven methods.

a reply to: Zaphod58


"They aren’t going to park a ship right on top of where they just sabotaged something."


Just guessing, but we probably don't park carriers in harbors of countries that we are about to sneak attack with stealth bombers either.

a reply to: MidnightWatcher

Then Russia has even more reasons to sabotage . Bully is a Bully.

originally posted by: vNex92
Even Still the big loser is Europe and Germany.

You hate Europe this much ? Well it is not surprising. Sometimes i wonder why russians are so afraid of their own state.. history of Russia explains.

a reply to: dollukka

That one is full of hate.

Best ignored.

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: dollukka

That one is full of hate.

Best ignored.

Maybe full of borscht?

a reply to: MidnightWatcher

And tears?

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: MidnightWatcher

And tears?

a reply to: Oldcarpy2

You can ask those who were mobilized from inuit village in Russia where population were 300 people.

Mobilization in some Russian regions is total. For example, all men of Tiumenevo village in Kemerovo Oblast were mobilized, 59 in total

Link

USS Kearsage was heading to Atlantic and passed United Kingdom 4 days ago.. so find the culprit elsewhere
LINK

originally posted by: MidnightWatcher

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0

originally posted by: dollukka
a reply to: v1rtu0s0

Pipeline was stopped by Russia, Europe´s reply was that russian gas can be replaced with other sources which they pretty much did. So the pipeline came useless for Russia, but sabotaging it will give Russia an excuse to "guard" it with russian navy and interfere to all marine traffic in Baltic Sea, makes sense does it ? We´ll see

So Russia satbotaged their own pipeline after the US warned they would take it down earlier this year?

I'm just trying to understand the logic. Now Russia can say we did it so they can declare war?

Couldn't they have done something else less elaborate? It's getting pretty confusing.

It is not "russia's pipeline".

Yeahbut Russia makes or loses the most money right ? 😧

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: MidnightWatcher

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0

originally posted by: dollukka
a reply to: v1rtu0s0

Pipeline was stopped by Russia, Europe´s reply was that russian gas can be replaced with other sources which they pretty much did. So the pipeline came useless for Russia, but sabotaging it will give Russia an excuse to "guard" it with russian navy and interfere to all marine traffic in Baltic Sea, makes sense does it ? We´ll see

So Russia satbotaged their own pipeline after the US warned they would take it down earlier this year?

I'm just trying to understand the logic. Now Russia can say we did it so they can declare war?

Couldn't they have done something else less elaborate? It's getting pretty confusing.

It is not "russia's pipeline".

Yeahbut Russia makes or loses the most money right ? 😧

They would if anyone was buying their gas.

But they didn't blow up 'their own pipeline'.