BUTCHERED KIDS DO NOT HAVE KIDS. Another layer to the depopulation agenda.

a reply to: Gothmog

I remember the 70s... I remember having way more fun than anyone has a right to... and some of those times did just happen to be on the back of a Harley -- or a Triumph!

Good times

a reply to: Boadicea

Used to love my Dad's buddies Norton chopper.

a reply to: MykeNukem

Oh wow. I remember those old Nortons. My dad had a buddy with a Norton too. He always had a rag in hand wiping it down and making it sparkle.... never saw him ride it tho. I always thought the low handlebars would make it uncomfortable to ride. But what do I know?

originally posted by: Boadicea
a reply to: MykeNukem

Oh wow. I remember those old Nortons. My dad had a buddy with a Norton too. He always had a rag in hand wiping it down and making it sparkle.... never saw him ride it tho. I always thought the low handlebars would make it uncomfortable to ride. But what do I know?

This thing had huge, tall handlebars, I could barely reach them as a kid.

I also remember him always working on it, looked awesome but I think it ran like crap, lol.

LGBTQ+ people have always been there, they're just not hiding any more.

Also, many of them adopt, solving another problem.

Yeah i get the depopulation argument and agree

However my view on the whole trasngedner movement is simple this.. the far left are creating a new voter base

Before it was hispanics and black people. Now they are losing that voter base and pretty much know they aint going to win back hearts and minds from our generation. They are playing the long game to get their new voter base..which to be honest is pretty much anyone that aint straight.

Same thing with the student debt bail out.they are buying votes from young minded people that ain't done a day's work in the real world in their life yet.

Thats my two pence worth

a reply to: FlyInTheOintment

originally posted by: LordAhriman
LGBTQ+ people have always been there, they're just not hiding any more.

Also, many of them adopt, solving another problem.

Don't seem like they use to hide the boy love in ancient times either so yeah they always been what a thought provoking thought from you, so happy you shared.

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: AndyMayhew
This should help reduce the population by hundreds, even thousands, of people over the next 30 years

(btw I hear the plan is going well. Now up to 7,970,000,000 worldwide, and growing by the second

)

every little conversion helps. And with it being so popular, who knows what could happen when they combine getting your gender changed with Pokemon Go 2.

Its confusing to me when people don't understand that SEX ORGANS is the only thing they change. The Chromosomes do not. "gender" is mentally how you see yourself and feel,regardless of the sex for some people.

If you cannot pass and have not received the surgery though you should not be able to even be around the people you think you should be around.

originally posted by: beyondknowledge
a reply to: FlyInTheOintment

I have recently been wondering why so many parents have been going along with this. Not being able to have grandchildren.

I don't think they realize what they are doing.

They are going along with it to be cool, to be in.

Parents of young kids are young themselves and to be hip, cool, and want to be edgy, like the Hollywood crowd. This is still a huge deal to parents of young children.

They are brainwashed into thinking their kid, thus by extension, they, will be special and they are proud that their child is "special", and so "brave".

The parents actually don't think the pubertal blocking drugs will cause sterility, which they often do. For transgender women with a penis, these are the same drugs given as chemical castration to sex offender males. Of course removing their gonads guarantees sterility.

Parents are choosing sterility for their children
because they want their child to stand out from the crowd as special,
unique and someone that others will admire for their "bravery".

It is a fad right now, one that years from now when these children grow up we will see the harm done as they sue their parents for changing their gender when they said they wanted to grow up to be a (man/woman).

This is like a child saying I want to be a famous gymnast and the parents put them in gymnastics, only for the next year the child says they want to be a famous painter and the parents put them in painting class. Except changing their gender can't be undone, ever, once puberty blocking and removing gonads have been done and genitals restructured.

Many children can and most likely will be psychologically destroyed and suffer for the rest of their lives for their parents making permanent something they "want to be" at age 3,4,5 even.

It will be the parents fault, some kids will never forgive their parents for doing this to them when they were at an age when they want to be a doctor today and a teacher tomorrow; when they were an age when they wanted to wear princess dresses all the time for months, then want to wear a superhero costume all the time for months.

It is child mutilation and the parents 10-20 years from now will sorely regret mutilating their children for a fad.

Making this legal and demanding everyone accept, cheer and celebrate transitioning little children to their chosen identity, means if a child says they feel like and want to be a cat; the parents are obligated to tattoo their faces and necks and arms and legs so they look like a cat; get plastic surgery to reshape their noses; and get dental implant long incisors to make them look like a cat.

This fad says if a child says they feel like and want to be a baby, that is their identity, the parents are obligated to let them wear diapers to school and the teachers obligated to change their diapers and hand feed them bottles for lunch in high school. If teachers refuse parents will say they are being identityphobic and discriminating against their child.

That is what is coming next now that we have glorified mutilation of children and demanding their whims be taken seriously and permanently.

Imagine the old "goth" kids being forced to wear black their entire lives and their faces tattooed to look pathetically depressed for their entire lives because they chose the "goth" identity as a kid.

This fad is a million times worse than that and is being glorified, supported, and called normal by the left, the liberals, the politically left politicians and progressives.

Worst of all, right now YOU are called by liberals and the left
an evil transphobe
and told if you don't celebrate and cheer transgenderism
and transitioning little children with drugs and surgery
you are a domestic terrorist or
enemy of the state
because you must be a MAGA semi-facist.

This is how the world operates today and how the left thinks and is trying to force everyone to think.

originally posted by: LordAhriman
LGBTQ+ people have always been there, they're just not hiding any more.

Also, many of them adopt, solving another problem.

True they have always been around.

But this has been turned into a fad where children are encouraged to mutilate their bodies for a fad. Worst of all liberals are encouraging pre-pubertal children to immediately begin taking drugs known to cause sterility and to have their gonads removed and genitals restructured. All this at an age where they want to be .... today as their identity, and change their minds often and tomorrow want to be .... as their identity.

If as another poster said 40% of today's children are claiming to be LGTBQP+ there won't be any children to adopt. The 60% will have a decent percentage who are infertile. Leaving only less than 50% of "chest feeders" "birthing parents" and breeders left as many will have also gone through menopause. Making parenthood something only the breeders (chestfeeders and birthing parents) (since mother is now a dirty filthy transphobic word) can do and they won't give up their children for adoption. Because, many if not most of the unwanted lumps of fetal tissue, will have been aborted. Since the left is desperately trying to make have Congress pass a law to make it legal and acceptable for a healthy breeder with a uterus and vagina, to abort a healthy fetus at 40 weeks at least one minute before it leaves the vagina, if a chest feeding birther decides he/she doesn't want the lump of fetal tissue, it will be destroyed rather than put up for adoption.

This will be a real issue in the future for people who want to adopt and for the P's who want sexual partners, who are rapidly gaining acceptance in the LGBTQ+ liberal left community.

originally posted by: MykeNukem

originally posted by: Gothmog

originally posted by: MykeNukem
a reply to: FlyInTheOintment

Yup, it seems that eroding the family unit is a priority to them.

A strong family unit is cohesive and strong, with principles that have been handed down through generations. That all goes away for every kid they can convert.

Our countries were built by strong families who had morals and ethics and a strong sense of right and wrong, and dare I say it, a Biblical foundation (in whatever form).

A world full of eunuchs (for all intents and purposes) is a lot easier to deal with than a cohesive family unit.

Also comes in very handy for a depopulation agenda.

Hahahaha . Dangggggg , I loved that comparison.

70's : those that say they remember the 70s are lying .
Or too old to "cut the mustard" at the time.

Lmao.

I bet you had a ton of fun you can't remember, ya ole dog.

I only remember cuz I was a kid lol.

I remember turning 14 . Not too much after that until I woke up married in '78

The pic you put up was an excellent comparison . Liberals in the 70s (when it mattered) vs. liberals in 2022 .
I understood completely the words "The Wussification of America" with that...
Book by Sean Hannity .

originally posted by: Boadicea
a reply to: Gothmog

I remember the 70s... I remember having way more fun than anyone has a right to... and some of those times did just happen to be on the back of a Harley -- or a Triumph!

Good times

I had fun , I am sure , cause I don't remember .....

originally posted by: MykeNukem
a reply to: FlyInTheOintment

Yup, it seems that eroding the family unit is a priority to them.

A strong family unit is cohesive and strong, with principles that have been handed down through generations. That all goes away for every kid they can convert.

Our countries were built by strong families who had morals and ethics and a strong sense of right and wrong, and dare I say it, a Biblical foundation (in whatever form).

A world full of eunuchs (for all intents and purposes) is a lot easier to deal with than a cohesive family unit.

Also comes in very handy for a depopulation agenda.

Oh, yeah. There definitely wasn't any issues with gay men and manly men who rode bikes back in the 70s





Oh, wait! What is this?

Is this the 70s? Dammit they're already starting them off young and inter-racial! Those damned hippies and people not raising their kids right! Shakes fists in fake outrage

a reply to: LordAhrimane

Yes, they have always been there.

That doesn’t change the fact that if you can persuade a child to want to make themselves unable to procreate via a trans “re-affirming” surgery, you have essentially guaranteed they will not be a parent. Thus, reducing the FOLLOWING generation by an average of 2 for each one. Think of this on a 100 year or roughly 5 generation scale, 2 becomes 4, 4 becomes 8, 8 to 16, and finally to 32. For each 1 child they convince not to conceive, that’s UP TO 32 people that won’t get born over the next 100 years. If they can con even just 2% of the world school aged children, that’s a world population decrease in 100 years of 500+ million.

When you think about it it’s a perfect plan, as long as no one catches on.

a reply to: FlyInTheOintment

furthermore, there's been a huge push for mass migration of third world citizens into the American & European continents, and I believe this is being done to outbreed the typical Western male, usually white or Mediterranean

I cant say you wrong.

a reply to: lSkrewloosel

The problem with most of the democrats they would be losing most of their traditional supporters and base.

This is not what the Liberalism was supposed to be about or going on with the agendas.

originally posted by: vNex92
a reply to: FlyInTheOintment

furthermore, there's been a huge push for mass migration of third world citizens into the American & European continents, and I believe this is being done to outbreed the typical Western male, usually white or Mediterranean

I cant say you wrong.

Imagine thinking the majority of America outside of its major cities, scratch that, including most of its major cities don't bear resemblance to "third-world countries"(does anyone remember when and why that became a thing and why it's not really considered a thing anymore?) and worrying about skin color.

Nope, let's just continue turning a blind eye to the countless people who can't afford healthcare, pay rent, or even afford to drive to work or eat every day.

I think with movies in a strong homosocial setting, different audiences beheld different things.
Some see a buddy movie, and some regard them as homoerotic.
John Wayne infamously called Easy Rider and Midnight Cowboy "perverted" (actually the latter he described in such homophobic terms, I couldn't repeat it here), ostensibly because there was no implied female reward or motivation at the end.

But that's very much in the eye of the beholder.
They were certainly not described as "LGBT" or "queer" films.

Strangely the last "motorcycle movie" (which was actually shown at art-house movies and LGBT movie festivals) was The Motorcycle Diaries around 2004.

I recall many leftist gay Professors and students swooned over this movie, although there's nothing pro-gay in the movie, and Che Guevara was hardly a friend of the LGBT community.

I can see the attraction of young hot men on motorcycles, but I never liked the fact that bikers were were often referred to as "organ donors".

And indeed, I can think of 3 young South Africans (one gay, two hetero) who lost their lives in motorcycle crashes, and they never got to leave any offspring either.

As for this whole trans-thing nowadays pushing surgery and puberty-blockers on kids - I agree that's creepy and wrong.

And that's actually increasingly in conflict with gay and lesbian people, because in order to be "gay" you actually need two biological genders.
That is as far as social constructionist theory regarding gender is actually becoming prescriptive.
I mean not much point being attracted to the same gender if it doesn't exist.

As far as the pic of two dudes (probably gay) on a scooter - they're not trans.
So what if they're not muscle men, most straight guys aren't either.
I sometimes watch dudes in historical war movies, thinking: "Wow, my muscles are bigger than theirs"!
But that came to me pretty late in life.

And that's the crux for me, butchering young people with surgeries and other medical interventions is not necessarily reversible (as it's advertised), and I would be a very unhappy man now if somebody had done that to me when I was younger.
And yip, as a childhood drag-queen, and then again in my post-army late-twenties (I was convinced I should become an "Indian" woman called Shakti once), but back then it wasn't that easy.
But then something else kicked in naturally, and praise Krishna, I kept my male-body!

a reply to: vNex92

I forgot to include my conclusion regarding that particular aspect of my OP - that those people would be so damn grateful to be in Europe or the US, they wouldn't object to strongly to the 'progressive' thought/ policy which make their future children decide they want to be part of the 40% LGBTQ+ generation. They would also be more amenable to severe political change, because even slavery in a first world nation is better than indentured servitude or destitution in a third world nation.