Knowledge Treasure Trove - (Di-)Electric, Electricity and Magnetism. Gravity = Counter-Space.

originally posted by: DaRAGE
Sure. We havn't been able to "measure" it in any sense. But then again we really havn't been able to find much of dark matter and dark energy now have we?

Which definition of dark matter are you using? The real definition in the real world, or the hijacked definition in your pseudoscience link that has a completely different definition? See, we can't even discuss these things without a common understanding of what the terms mean and that's why this "dictionary abuse" by pseudoscientists is such a bad thing, it impedes any kind of rational discussion or understanding. If I use the pseudoscience definition which talks about "magnets, atoms, and charged entities", we can measure all three of those, but if I use the real definition we can measure some apparent gravitational interaction like orbit changes and gravitational lensing, but there appears to be an absence of magnets, atoms and charged entities in dark matter.

So there's a huge language barrier with pseudoscience re-defining terms with "dictionary abuse", and there seems to be a lantuage barrier in the next comment too:

"we are looking at the detector plane on the monitor. Bright spots appear here and there. These spots indicated individual electrons."

Do they really? Or do they detect a field of charge, which is a disturbance compared to a field of no charge?

I'm not arguing for or against, but i'm just trying to get you to open your mind and think differently, and perhaps rethink about the things that you think you know, and see if what you actually know is really as true as you think.

Scientists speak in the language of scientists and they understand each other, but apparently you don't speak that language so it's difficult to have a rational conversation when we aren't defining terms the same way.

The widely held mainstream view is this:

How Do Quantum Fields Create Particles?

all the particles that exist, at the core of their nature, are just excited quantum fields themselves.

So we say the nature of particles like the electron is that they are excititations of a field, we don't say because they are excitations of a field they don't exist. Your pseudoscience link says electrons "utterly do not exist".

Also would explain why the surface of the sun is like millions of degree's and the stuff coming off the sun accelerates. Electric energy from elsewhere flowing towards the sun, an area of least resistance.

Anyways. Something to think about.

Considerable thought has been given to the power source of the sun, and while our fusion models may not be perfect, they are probably in the right ballpark and we can rule out the "electric-powered" sun model using observation, especially now with more accurate measurements from the Parker solar probe, which we hope will give us a better understanding of coronal heating, but we already have a pretty good understanding that it has a lot to do with the complex electromagnetic fields around the sun, something the Parker probe is measuring.