Trump says he won't oppose move to unseal Mar-a-Lago search warrant

originally posted by: Axios
a reply to: RazorV66

Your blind hatred for Trump doesn’t matter to him, he’s dealt with worse the last 6 years.

And your blind loyalty doesnt either. oh wait....maybe it does.

You can be sure if they had something on him, it would have already been leaked by a con artist cult member to damage Trump even more.

Sources are saying the documents related to nuclear weapons, deployment and strategies...a few discussions on it in the threads this morning.

is that weak sauce really the best you have? Blind Loyalty? is that the opposite of Blind hatred?

Why not go with the facts, or in your case, "what sources close to the situation say".

And exactly what, in your eyes, does going too far look like? My Clown World theory hinges largely on the fact that the haters seem to have no depth that is too deep, no low that is too low, and no distance that seems just a bit too far. Anything that is "anti Trump" is A-OK, and totally permissible. Hillary's lies about Russia? not a fuggin peep from you or anyone else, just the "Blind loyalty" folks finding that wrong. Honk honk muther #er.

originally posted by: new_here

originally posted by: AndyFromMichigan
It seems like the government can't get its story straight about what they were looking for. "Sources" are saying anything & everything, lately including nuclear secrets.

Yes and then twitter erupted with "He's gonna sell them to Russia. Hang him."
Seriously, with absolutely no proof someone can whisper a rumor and the verdict is instant!

That's why it was done with this timing. Just in time to try to influence the mid-term elections.

Remember this: Joe Biden's deputy press secretary posted this little gem. With a symbol used by the Nazi's called the "Railroad Eagle" both in front of and behind Joe Biden.

I urge all conservatives to stay calm, don't fall for what they are trying desperately to get you to do.

Turn the other cheek.

Like the Russian collusion hoax and the warrant connected to that - it will all be revealed in the end.

Don't engage in violence, don't threaten anyone, it may just be what they are trying to get you to do. Don't play their games.

originally posted by: The2Billies

originally posted by: new_here

originally posted by: AndyFromMichigan
It seems like the government can't get its story straight about what they were looking for. "Sources" are saying anything & everything, lately including nuclear secrets.

Yes and then twitter erupted with "He's gonna sell them to Russia. Hang him."
Seriously, with absolutely no proof someone can whisper a rumor and the verdict is instant!

That's why it was done with this timing. Just in time to try to influence the mid-term elections.

Remember this: Joe Biden's deputy press secretary posted this little gem. With a symbol used by the Nazi's called the "Railroad Eagle"

I urge all conservatives to stay calm, don't fall for what they are trying desperately to get you to do. Turn the other cheek. Like the Russian collusion hoax and the warrant connected to that - it will all be revealed in the end. Don't engage in violence, don't threaten anyone, it may just be what they are trying to get you to do. Don't play their games.

I think this is the hail Mary to try to get any kind of uprising to take place. They desperately need to have a group of conservatives with guns to point to, so they can jail any conservative with a Gadsden flag.

www.foxnews.com...

NPR reported on Wednesday that Gov. Ron DeSantis’ tweet of a new Florida license plate with the Gadsden flag has "reopened the debate" over the flag’s controversy.

Scott Neuman’s report claimed that, despite the famous "Don’t Tread on Me" flag existing since the founding of the nation, it is now associated with "far-right extremist ideology."

"The imagery of the Revolutionary War-era Gadsden flag dates to Benjamin Franklin but has, for many, come to symbolize a far-right extremist ideology and the ‘Stop the Steal’ movement that sought to overturn the 2020 presidential election results," Neuman wrote.

Your new narrative taking place before your eyes. Sure this flag has been around since the founding fathers days, but today, right now, it's a call to right wing white supremacists to arm themselves and take over the republic! Or it just symbolized "don't fluck with me, and I won't kill you", but the former is much juicier and obviously the right answer.

a reply to: network dude

is that weak sauce really the best you have? Blind Loyalty? is that the opposite of Blind hatred?

Blind hatred and blind loyalty can make a person do something that they otherwise would not. So yes, these two concepts have similarities.

Why not go with the facts, or in your case, "what sources close to the situation say"

I have already said that this information lacks credibility and should be taken with a grain of salt in other threads. People are saying if this was a legit warrant that leaks would have happened...I am pointing out the potential leaks from "sources".

Hillary's lies about Russia? not a fuggin peep from you or anyone else, just the "Blind loyalty" folks finding that wrong. Honk honk muther #er.

I disagree with much of what the Clintons have done, including their scandals. It is all equally deplorable to me.

originally posted by: Axios
a reply to: network dude

is that weak sauce really the best you have? Blind Loyalty? is that the opposite of Blind hatred?

Blind hatred and blind loyalty can make a person do something that they otherwise would not. So yes, these two concepts have similarities.

Why not go with the facts, or in your case, "what sources close to the situation say"

I have already said that this information lacks credibility and should be taken with a grain of salt in other threads. People are saying if this was a legit warrant that leaks would have happened...I am pointing out the potential leaks from "sources".

Hillary's lies about Russia? not a fuggin peep from you or anyone else, just the "Blind loyalty" folks finding that wrong. Honk honk muther #er.

I disagree with much of what the Clintons have done, including their scandals. It is all equally deplorable to me.

you seem to miss the part where the Clintons used the FBI to do their work for them. This issue is currently about the FBI being politicized. Do you agree that the FBI and the DOJ are acting as the enforcement wing of the DNC, or do you deny that?

a reply to: The2Billies

You are soo right, this is an agenda, has been one since the beginning, Is beyond me why democrats are soo pro violence, regardless of how many people can lose their lives, remember the BLM and antifa?, democrats used them to instigate violence and burning of our cities, killing people in their way.

Nobody wants to talk about that anymore, while our cities were burning, the liberal media was supporting all that.

Doesn't people understand that this is all been manufactured, encourage and pushed.

Now is a campaign to get Americans upset, angry, divided and combative soo people can get in the streets and fight, is all planned, what anybody think is going to happen after, we the people are the losers, see only terrorist groups like antifa and BLM can be destructive because they align with the agenda.

Lets use what we got and is given right as per our constitution, lets fight with the ballot, vote peacefully but with a purpose. Midterm we should all walk or drive to our voting precincts and vote.

Violence never fix anything.

They were set up again.

Lmfao.

Trump is a legend.

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: Axios
a reply to: network dude

is that weak sauce really the best you have? Blind Loyalty? is that the opposite of Blind hatred?

Blind hatred and blind loyalty can make a person do something that they otherwise would not. So yes, these two concepts have similarities.

Why not go with the facts, or in your case, "what sources close to the situation say"

I have already said that this information lacks credibility and should be taken with a grain of salt in other threads. People are saying if this was a legit warrant that leaks would have happened...I am pointing out the potential leaks from "sources".

Hillary's lies about Russia? not a fuggin peep from you or anyone else, just the "Blind loyalty" folks finding that wrong. Honk honk muther #er.

I disagree with much of what the Clintons have done, including their scandals. It is all equally deplorable to me.

you seem to miss the part where the Clintons used the FBI to do their work for them. This issue is currently about the FBI being politicized. Do you agree that the FBI and the DOJ are acting as the enforcement wing of the DNC, or do you deny that?

I would agree with you more that the FBI and other government agencies have become more politicized when they should not. Especially over the last 6-8 years.

I would perhaps go as far as to say that this could a combined effort of the DNC and certain-GOP members.

originally posted by: frogs453
a reply to: putnam6

What's the over/under that just before 3 we get another statement that although he wants to have it released, his lawyers decide that they should object because it's a "distraction" or was "illegal" or some other reason, but he really, really wanted it released?

Will be interesting either way. We will see them or suddenly they won't want us to.

What’s the over/under that you’re wrong about everything per usual?

originally posted by: Axios

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: Axios
a reply to: network dude

is that weak sauce really the best you have? Blind Loyalty? is that the opposite of Blind hatred?

Blind hatred and blind loyalty can make a person do something that they otherwise would not. So yes, these two concepts have similarities.

Why not go with the facts, or in your case, "what sources close to the situation say"

I have already said that this information lacks credibility and should be taken with a grain of salt in other threads. People are saying if this was a legit warrant that leaks would have happened...I am pointing out the potential leaks from "sources".

Hillary's lies about Russia? not a fuggin peep from you or anyone else, just the "Blind loyalty" folks finding that wrong. Honk honk muther #er.

I disagree with much of what the Clintons have done, including their scandals. It is all equally deplorable to me.

you seem to miss the part where the Clintons used the FBI to do their work for them. This issue is currently about the FBI being politicized. Do you agree that the FBI and the DOJ are acting as the enforcement wing of the DNC, or do you deny that?

I would agree with you more that the FBI and other government agencies have become more politicized when they should not. Especially over the last 6-8 years.

I would perhaps go as far as to say that this could a combined effort of the DNC and certain-GOP members.

wouldn't it be a good idea to keep those thoughts in mind when labeling the "Blindly loyal", but mistaking them for people who see this as a problem, no matter who it's being done to?

originally posted by: Axios

originally posted by: mikell
If they found anything you know it would already be leaked out to cnn. I think they have to plant evidence to match the warrant.

Just my $0.02

Sources say it was confidential documents on nuclear weapons, deployments and strategies. I presume this would be a leak.

-Possibly Important Info-

Here is the Best explanation I've seen for WHY the FBI Raided former President Trump's home on August 8th. They were after a specific (very damning to Obama) document.

FIRST READ THIS: twitter.com...

Here is a link to the REDACTED FISA Report/Order: www.dni.gov...

"Sundance", over at theconservativetreehouse.com... -intel-in-mar-a-lago/ has a good track record of predicting these things, because his passion is analyzing the inner workings (both good and bad) of our government.

a reply to: carewemust

Equally as interesting and potentially damaging a confidential nuclear documentation. I guess if that is what they were aiming to recover, we probably wont be specifically told.

originally posted by: Axios
a reply to: carewemust

Equally as interesting and potentially damaging a confidential nuclear documentation. I guess if that is what they were aiming to recover, we probably wont be specifically told.

we had better be specifically told, otherwise, this is exactly what the right has been calling it. Another failed witch hunt.

originally posted by: Axios
a reply to: carewemust

Equally as interesting and potentially damaging a confidential nuclear documentation. I guess if that is what they were aiming to recover, we probably wont be specifically told.

There are several clues (from Trump and others) pointing to an unredacted www.dni.gov... however.

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: Axios

originally posted by: mikell
If they found anything you know it would already be leaked out to cnn. I think they have to plant evidence to match the warrant.

Just my $0.02

Sources say it was confidential documents on nuclear weapons, deployments and strategies. I presume this would be a leak.

-Possibly Important Info-

Here is the Best explanation I've seen for WHY the FBI Raided former President Trump's home on August 8th. They were after a specific (very damning to Obama) document.

FIRST READ THIS: twitter.com...

Here is a link to the REDACTED FISA Report/Order: www.dni.gov...

"Sundance", over at theconservativetreehouse.com... -intel-in-mar-a-lago/ has a good track record of predicting these things, because his passion is analyzing the inner workings (both good and bad) of our government.

Just so we are following along here, the assertion is that Trump got ahold of an unredacted copy of the 2017 FISA warrant implicating Obama? Not gonna lie I'm skeptical of that too. Or am I missing something

a reply to: putnam6

President Trump ASKED for specific unredacted documents in the weeks before leaving office. His (temporary for a reason) DNI John Ratcliffe provided them to him.

www.dni.gov... is but one of several.

DNI = Director of National Intelligence (90% of Americans don't know what DNI means. We must all strive harder to write for the masses.)

Radcliffe was "Trouble" in the eyes of Obama supporters: www.wired.com...

All indicators point to info damaging to Democrats in general, and the Obama Admin specifically.

Its sad... as a none american and somebody who has completely gone of trump slowly over the past few years, mostly because i dont think it matters at all who gets in i cannot see any major changes under either administrations, its so strange why theyre so scared of this man, its like the whole country has gone insaner tbh, BUT its clear to see this politcal persecution is political in nature, its a real stain on US politics and democracy across the western world tbh, i see the media are saying Trumpies are online calling for violence?

it couldn't be more twisted tbh, i visited some old sites and groups which has hardcore supporters for trump or democrats and all i see is the majority of trump supporters calling for calm and anybody calling for violence is a fed, please report them etc etc etc

On the flip is dems calling for death penalty, the assassination of once and for all, imprisonment without a crime, these people are far more publicly vocal and insane IMO, theyre very sick and stupid people

and for this reason alone, i sure hope Trump runs in 2024, these people all need to see justice every single one of them blind hate after 6 years of lies by the media has turned these people into dangerous obsessed and possessed LUNATICS get a fking grip guys its politics and democracy, you're acting like brain-dead viscous apes, this stuff belongs in banana republic, DEMs .... you've utterly lost your minds lol

Once again, former President Trump DEMANDS the Search Warrant and accompanying Affidavit be LEGALLY UNSEALED by the Justice Department.

thepostmillennial.com...

originally posted by: carewemust
Once again, former President Trump DEMANDS the Search Warrant and accompanying Affidavit be LEGALLY UNSEALED by the Justice Department.

thepostmillennial.com...

Will it be unsealed and publicized today you think?

a reply to: Tekner

Unless it has to do with Hunter, Obama or Hillary right?