It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

AG Merrick Garland will be issuing a statement at 2:30pm today.

page: 16
16
<< 13  14  15    17  18  19 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 12 2022 @ 11:42 AM
link   

originally posted by: frogs453
a reply to: shooterbrody

It will be sad when your big smiles turn to extreme rage and tears.

Oh I think they knew he wouldn't destroy the documents, he was using them. Little did he know someone close to him had enough and ratted.

It’s cool
I won’t wait to call out your lies.
June 3rd mr trump HIMSELF welcomed FBI agents into his residence to discuss documents.
The agents didn’t remove them then.

Your ill conceived lies simply make no sense and are exposed as simple political hackery.



posted on Aug, 12 2022 @ 11:48 AM
link   
a reply to: shooterbrody

We know that. He told the feds that this was the specific area he kept them. Maybe from his mole friend they knew that was a lie, and laid a plan. We really don't know at this point. You speculate it's nothing but business as usual, everybody does it, nothing to see here, move along.

I speculate there is more to the story than we know at this time.



posted on Aug, 12 2022 @ 11:51 AM
link   
a reply to: frogs453
Lol
So you admit cooperation FROM MR TRUMP HIMSELF allowing agents into his residence in June?
Yet claim ANY exigency now?

Ahahahahahaha
Aaaahahahahahaha

You have no credibility at this point.
I at least thought you were confused about the actual record of interaction.



posted on Aug, 12 2022 @ 12:01 PM
link   
a reply to: Xcalibur254




State, nuclear, secrets are a bit different than Nixon's recorded rants.


that at this point is only speculation, no evidence other than reports that was what they were looking for from anonymous source.

in the U.S. people are innocent until proven guilty.



posted on Aug, 12 2022 @ 12:02 PM
link   
a reply to: shooterbrody

Uh they had a subpoena. I mean I guess he could have tried to have his security beat them up or whatever, but when U.S. counterintelligence comes knocking, it's in your best interest to answer. So, let's see when info comes out, were the classified documents where he claimed or where they eventually found in another area, did he as a stable genius lie that they were in that area and think the feds were too dumb and they would just accept what he told them? Again, we're all speculating. Which is what's fun about ATS.



posted on Aug, 12 2022 @ 12:05 PM
link   
a reply to: frogs453
Lol
You don’t know what exigency is?
That is hilarious.

Good day



posted on Aug, 12 2022 @ 12:11 PM
link   
a reply to: frogs453

And still no proof Trump took anything. But we know He Himself personally didn't pack anything, other personnel did that.😎

Too many people involved and we know Trump had planted leakers that were never ID'd 😎



posted on Aug, 12 2022 @ 12:14 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

While Trump did not personally pack the documents, they were in his possession and he had been notified for 18+ months they needed to be returned. At that point, culpability falls on him.



posted on Aug, 12 2022 @ 12:15 PM
link   
a reply to: Xcalibur254

LOCK HIM UP!



posted on Aug, 12 2022 @ 12:16 PM
link   
a reply to: shooterbrody

Once again, the DOJ had received credible intelligence that Trump was storing classified documents in unsecured locations. That is why there was a sudden change in urgency and escalation.



posted on Aug, 12 2022 @ 12:20 PM
link   

originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: shooterbrody

Once again, the DOJ had received credible intelligence that Trump was storing classified documents in unsecured locations. That is why there was a sudden change in urgency and escalation.


it's cute how you state that as fact, when you haven't a clue of the facts. DERP on sir.



posted on Aug, 12 2022 @ 12:25 PM
link   
a reply to: network dude

And it's cute how you guys act like it's a fact that there were no new developments been the subpoena being issued in June and the search warrant being executed when you haven't a clue of the facts.



posted on Aug, 12 2022 @ 12:27 PM
link   
a reply to: Xcalibur254

I just don't care, I am not emotionally attached to any of this lol.

Let's see the cards man, I'm ready for the full spread eagle money shot.



posted on Aug, 12 2022 @ 12:28 PM
link   
Who said such?

“They”?

The official record shows cooperation.
Period



posted on Aug, 12 2022 @ 12:30 PM
link   

originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: network dude

And it's cute how you guys act like it's a fact that there were no new developments been the subpoena being issued in June and the search warrant being executed when you haven't a clue of the facts.


we don't know anything other than Garland authorized this and the White house knew nothing of it. So essentially we know the DOJ went rouge. That's all we know. Unless you have document to back up your mouth.



posted on Aug, 12 2022 @ 12:35 PM
link   
a reply to: network dude

They've gone rouge? But the blue & yellow color scheme looks so good.



posted on Aug, 12 2022 @ 12:40 PM
link   
Paywall because it's the first to the punch. Others should be available shortly.



FBI agents who searched former President Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago home Monday removed 11 sets of classified documents, including some marked as top secret and meant to be only available in special government facilities, according to documents reviewed by The Wall Street Journal.


Link

It included information on the President of France and something about a pardon for someone besides the classified and SCIF documents
edit on 12-8-2022 by frogs453 because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 12 2022 @ 12:46 PM
link   
a reply to: frogs453

Why is the WSJ reviewing FBI documents? Furthermore why did the head of the DOJ not announce this? In fact, why is the president not on TV declaring Trump a traitor?

That is how it should happen if it is for real. Hang him.

Amazing how that story must have been sent out to all networks...

nypost.com...


edit on Augpm31pmf0000002022-08-12T12:50:12-05:001212 by matafuchs because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 12 2022 @ 12:50 PM
link   
a reply to: matafuchs

No idea. Just brought the latest news I saw.



posted on Aug, 12 2022 @ 12:58 PM
link   
Yeah
So
They knew it was there in June

NO CRIME
NO WARRANT



new topics

top topics



 
16
<< 13  14  15    17  18  19 >>

log in

join