FOIA Request Reveals School District Hid Library Database That Has Pornographic Material

School Administrators & Activist try to hide the material that they have available to the kids in their libraries. A FOIA requests revealed an email requesting that they hide it from parents. Now they know why.

Funny that you have to hide the contents of a child's library isn't it? You might think that if the material will get you banned from Facebook for posting a picture of it that it probably isn't what needs to be in the children's library.

When you block off a library, it tells me you have something to hide, there's something you don't want people to see, and that's a huge red flag."

www.libsoftiktok.com...

A FOIA request submitted by parents in Richland School District Two reveal the district was desperate to hide the library database from parents because of "scrutiny."

Parents who were already outraged over the material in the library submitted a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request last month which revealed an email from Richland School District officials demanding the library be locked.

The now-disclosed email (shown below) was sent by Richland’s Library Media Specialist, Amy Whitfield. The email states that RSD’s Chief Academic Officer, Nancy Gregory, had requested the district “remove guest access to our library catalogs” to hinder anyone “who may have malicious intent in searching our library collections.” Whitfield directed RSD staff to “do this as soon as possible.”

What the parents found explains why the district was so desperate to hide it.

A quick search reveals 29 book options when searching the district’s middle school libraries for “gender identity.” Looking in the elementary school category, we found a lot of alarming material. Books being hidden from the public included stories for children about gender identity, transgender kids using opposite sex bathrooms, cross-dressing toddlers, and our “racist” Founding Fathers.

a reply to: infolurker

"You might think that if the material will get you banned from Facebook for posting a picture of it that it probably isn't what needs to be in the children's library."

So you think if Facebook doesn't allow it then it should be banned from schools? That's kind of scary. Didn't Facebook and Twitter just ban the word "groomer"?

Children are most malleable from birth to around 11/12 years old, long before they're even aware of their sexuality, gender identity issues, gender dysmorphia and all the other crap our weaponized educational system has deemed necessary to brainwash them with.

They'd better keep the borders open and drugs flowing for the coming generation; they're going to need all the help they can get to escape from the reality being created for/by them.

Um, what is up with that sign over the door on the elementary school library? ' XXX Large adult section in the back XXX'


Yes, I also posted this on another thread. It is so revelavent I think it needs to be here also. Besides, recycling is supposed to be a good thing right?

a reply to: Infinitis

You reply like you completely missed the point of that comment. OP wasn't saying that FB and Twatter should set the standards; rather that even those crappy platforms recognize unhealthy, socially unacceptable content, so it should be obvious to a school board.

But you already know that. You're just trying to derail the conversation. Don't be a troll ..
:

a reply to: infolurker

First religion was attacked, this opened the door for now the attacks of our children by the same institutions that we trust our children to be receiving a good education, then we are forced to pay for this sick bastard with our own tax dollars.

What I do not get is, how this crap has gotten soo out of control.

Who run the education system? another transgender or a drag queen.

a reply to: infolurker

A database you say?

That's sexy.

a reply to: infolurker

There are "restricted access" Rooms for Adults in many Libraries, so Im wondering.

Since the SCOTUS couldnt define what constitutes "porn" years ago and left it up in the air....why? And what is it now? How can it be banned without definition? (Please! No personal definition interpretations here.)

The points of, not what constitutes porn....so they ban, ok...But, under whose general umbrella if the definition of same isnt clear?