Lots Of Pedos: Moms on social media to remove photos of kids, 'Sick people'

originally posted by: MikhailBakunin
Theres plenty of statutes that protect minors identity varying from state to state but also federal that can be used anytime a minor is appropriated into a situation.

There is no law on the books that prevents a parent from posting non-explicit images of their children online nor one preventing people from taking photos in public and posting them as well. You're making this up.

a reply to: MikhailBakunin

Was that you posting a statute to back up your invented nonsense?

a reply to: MikhailBakunin

You said this:

originally posted by: MikhailBakunin
It pretty much states that you can be persecuted for posting anything regarding people under 18. It doesnt matter if youre the parent or it is of you as a kid. It is breaking a federal law.

Where's the Federal law that will 'persecute' you for posting pictures of your children online? We're still waiting.

originally posted by: Islandparty
a reply to: Tundra

Didn't mean to say you want likes. Was just in general, sorry I worded that wrong.

2nd

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
a reply to: MikhailBakunin

You said this:

originally posted by: MikhailBakunin
It pretty much states that you can be persecuted for posting anything regarding people under 18. It doesnt matter if youre the parent or it is of you as a kid. It is breaking a federal law.

Where's the Federal law that will 'persecute' you for posting pictures of your children online? We're still waiting.

. 18 U.S.C. § 2251

You dont need to put on your Johnny Cochran panties to google these statutes yourself.

originally posted by: MikhailBakunin
18 U.S.C. § 2251

That deals with child pornography which I already covered when I said posting of explicit photos was illegal. You said 'for posting anything' which is not the case.

a reply to: marg6043

My Niece's husband is a Child Psychiatrist for a school district. I asked him about all of this "gender" BS concerning young children. He told me that he wasn't allowed to comment on it because of his work, but, one thing he said was that it's job security for him.

Told yall so. It's more prevalent than just a few kids here and there.

For every young boy and girl on TikTok, Instagram, or whatever there are a handful of pervs and pedos.

Don't believe me go see for yourself. Any photo that a pedo can get off to will have dirty comments, whether it's them swimming, doing gymnastics, being naively unaware or their revealing clothing, or if they've been groomed to like the attention they will start purposefully doing pervy #.

The accounts that are "monitored by mom." Will still have pervs and pedos, because those girls make mommy the big bucks, and mommy needs those nasty pervs to keep paying for pictures, videos, and "personal/private sets." They just can't comment nasty #.

Both young boys and girls are groomed on social media. The best thing to do if you're going to let them use that garbage is to be proactive, warn them of the dangers, and show them how to restrict comments and messaging to friends only and to not accept friend requests from strangers.

Not everybody posts their childrens pictures for the whole world to see, lotta folks like me and the missus live 4k miles away from our families so social media is an easy way for them to get to see the minion growing.

That said way to many people have their posts open and public to all and I cant understand that at all.

What happened to photo albums? Family photos should be private for the most part.

a reply to: Irishhaf

I've been an officer at a small Social Club for years. We have several family events through out the year. Our main one for kids is the Christmas Party. We used to post pictures of the party on the Club website and Facebook page. We stopped doing it, not because of parent complaints or because we thought that somebody was using them for lewd purposes. We stopped posting them because of the Karens who thought that their job was to police the internet. We had threats of having the police called on us, Child Welfare being called and if they found out the Parent's names, calls to their employers. After all of the hassle, we just decided to stop putting up the pictures. Now we shoot the pictures and the parents can download them off the Club's computer if they choose.

It's been my experience that 95% of this is hype and male cow feces. To me that's a problem, because it takes away from the 5% that is REAL.

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: MikhailBakunin
18 U.S.C. § 2251

That deals with child pornography which I already covered when I said posting of explicit photos was illegal. You said 'for posting anything' which is not the case.

Youre right. What he meant to address is the state to state child protection laws, COPPA, and some bullshi+ the FCC put out.

Every state and country uses different levels of security due to weirdo Greek culture embracing acts that would give Mccauley Culkin flashbacks...

originally posted by: MikhailBakunin
Youre right.

I know I'm right, I said it multiple times. There are no laws, Federal or otherwise, that prevent parents from posting non-explicit photos of their kids. You made it up.

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: MikhailBakunin
Youre right.

I know I'm right, I said it multiple times. There are no laws, Federal or otherwise, that prevent parents from posting non-explicit photos of their kids. You made it up.

I know, you know, you’re right.

But, you’re right.

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: MikhailBakunin
Youre right.

I know I'm right, I said it multiple times. There are no laws, Federal or otherwise, that prevent parents from posting non-explicit photos of their kids. You made it up.

But... you do know of the laws I misrepresented and was attempting to explain. Thats why you keep retorting specifically the part where I said parents post their children's photos. And you are aware of laws protecting minors and how strict the court system can be involving minors interacting with adults online, especially on social media. And is why Facebook's T&C says you must be 18+ or have parental guidance. And the ego is far more important than the actual clarification on such matters, at least in the midst of the selfish mundane trogs and their meanderings of pud whacking and self-absorption.

*media doesn't hide minor's faces or any form of identification for sh!+s and giggles
**which is really what I was trying to express... whatever legalities they abide by for doing that. Its not like I just pulled it out of your rectal prolapse of an online persona you're flaunting all over ATS

originally posted by: MikhailBakunin
But... you do know of the laws I misrepresented and was attempting to explain.

All of the laws you admittedly misrepresented in your effort to try and support your invented nonsense have nothing to do with parents posting their own children's photos online. You're in a hole, stop digging.

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: MikhailBakunin
But... you do know of the laws I misrepresented and was attempting to explain.

All of the laws you admittedly misrepresented in your effort to try and support your invented nonsense have nothing to do with parents posting their own children's photos online. You're in a hole, stop digging.

Any child protection laws have everything to do with parents posting pictures of children online. Theres thousands of cases of parents doing lude acts like prostiting their children that has forced these laws like COPPA for children's protection. Any statute Ive posted that protect minors are not made up.

We can pull up all sorts of cases.

Why are you so big on protecting child pornography?

abcnews.go.com...


"There are an estimated 100,000 to 150,000 child sex workers in the U.S. The common perception of human trafficking often involves a kidnapping; someone is taken from their home, tossed into a vehicle and forced into prostitution. Though they don't yet know the exact numbers, officials in Blair County said some kids are being bought and sold from their own homes."