Historic decision against mandatory 'vaccines' in Italy risk to human dna now legally established

An article from childrenhealthdefense.eu :

The judge ruled that the psychologist doesn’t need to be vaccinated in order to do his job by establishing that:

these substances don’t prevent infection and transmission. Therefore, in front of the Italian law, there can not be an obligation.
She also recognises that these substances provokes severe adverse events.
Therefore, it even less legitimate to force anybody to be injected.
The judge put the dignity of the human being at the centre and referred twice to the period of Nazism and Fascism. Mandatory vaccination is possible if there is informed consent. For Covid injections, she explained that an informed consent is not possible as we don’t know the ingredients and the mechanisms of these substances because of industrial and alleged military secret.

Childrenhealthdefense.eu article

AND YET, nothing will change with the US 'vaccine' mandates to enter the country for non-US travelers.
All is proven that these so called 'vaccines' don't stop transmission and don't lower your risk of catching covid, yet nothing will change with these travelers mandates

a reply to: ancientlight

First of many I think.

Watch higher courts try to overrule.

The logic used is undeniable.

Many more to come once the pawns are being removed.

P

Interesting to hear a judge mention the military secrets behind what is going on, must be some substantial evidence around that one to even go there.

Otherwise, good to hear some common sense is still alive.

Long past due, happy to see this but yea nothing will change stateside our congress apparently stays bought.

Shame all those vets that went to congress the last dozen years or so immediately rolled over and sold out.