It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Thrumbo
There must've been intel on some of them western weapons being in the port, despite the fact that the sea is utterly littered with mines.
So why wouldn’t the Ruskies just say
“We attacked weapons in the port” rather than deny they attacked the report
Where is the proof, images, evidence
Because the agreement is they don't attack the port.
Are you claiming that Russia agreed to let Ukraine station military hardware at the port and they will not attack it?
That is really dumb and I don't believe they would make an agreement like that.
The Russian and Ukrainian sides will also withhold attacks on any of the commercial vessels or ports engaged in the initiative to transport vital grain, while UN and Turkish monitors will be present in Ukrainian ports in order to demarcate areas protected by the agreement.
www.aljazeera.com...
"Those that understand the world through MSM headlines are fools"
>Our source explains why the Russians hit the tugboat and military boats with missiles in the port of Odessa right now, after signing the grain case in Istanbul?
>Yesterday they began to disperse the message that the grain case is allegedly insurance of the Odessa region against offensive and missile strikes. The entire elite in Odessa immediately exhaled, and the military began to think about how to use this "insurance" for their own purposes.
Today, the Russians have destroyed this myth by hinting that if they suspect something and fix it, they will immediately strike at "military and related facilities." They don't care about the reaction of the West now. In fact, they don't even think about it now (by the way, the West created it itself when it immediately blamed the Russian Federation for any abandoned fake. Now the Russian Federation, the opinion of the West is not interested).
Odesa: in a rocket attack on the port of Odesa, apparently the armored amphibious assault boat "Malin" (Centaur class) was destroyed including several other vessels. The Ukrainian Republic of Moldova owns only one other boat of this class named "Stanislav"
Maria Vladimirovna Zakharova (Russian: Мария Владимировна Захарова; born 24 December 1975) is the Director of the Information and Press Department of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation[2] (Spokeswoman for the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation)
Attack launched by high-precision long-range sea-based missiles has resulted in the elimination of Ukrainian military ship and a depot of Harpoon anti-ship missiles delivered by USA to the Kiev regime in the seaport of Odessa. The list of neutralised targets also includes the production facilities of an entity specialised in repairing and modernising the fleet of Ukrainian Navy.
So what you are showing me is that your information is 2nd or third hand and you assume that military targets would not be touched.
I am sure the entire agreement is contingent on what military presence in the port. I am pretty sure that Ukraine tested it and lost.
originally posted by: vNex92
a reply to: gortex
Turkey deny that charge.
Looks Like Ukrainians are learning something from what the US taught the Syrian rebels in Syria how to wag the dog.
If anyone was likely trying to target it that would be the Ukrainians trying to blame the Russians while currently using the newly acquired missiles.
but in my opinion the BBC is closer to a balanced news outlet compared to most.
originally posted by: turretless
originally posted by: TwistedPsycho
a reply to: turretless
Link works here... Sky News
Here is what I got.
Russia claims responsibility for missile strike on Ukrainian port city 1 day after agreeing to allow exports
originally posted by: anonentity
a reply to: Grimpachi
Nothing is as it seems in Ukraine. I found this interesting snippet by an analyst who thinks that Zelensky is about to get wasted, as at a meeting of spooks the CIA man said he feared for his life. The reason given is that after the last city in the fortified part of Ukraine is taken. There is nothing but cow country to the borders of Poland so Zelensky's only purpose left is to be a martyr, and they will blame Russia. Which will leave Ukraine in chaos. Interesting view if it pans out.www.bitchute.com...
originally posted by: turretless
Is there any other proof?
originally posted by: Grimpachi
Zelensky has to know that they have no chance of taking back the territories they lost. The so called Kherson offensive is mostly propaganda. They have tried several times to break through but have been beaten back time and time again with heavy losses.
I have read from some analysts that Ru soldiers have mostly withdrawn and are resting while the forces holding the lines now are made up of LPR/DPR, Chechens, and mercenaries. When it starts up again and they take Donbas that is going to be the end for UA. Zelensky is going to have to compromise and he is getting rid of the elements in command that would kill him when he does.
What you are showing me is your desperation to make excuses for the aggressor in this conflict , as Russia's lies are par for the course in this war so are your excuses for their actions
Pretty sure when they Nuke Florida you'll have a good excuse for that too.