Pluto's Warming Causing it to Lose It's atmosphere.

a reply to: Fowlerstoad

Even back in 2015-2016 Pluto was warming up, as well as Charon. Back then it was emitting so much heat that astronomers were puzzled because neither Pluto nor Charon have the density/mass or the core to produce such warming/heat.

By Eric Hand Jul. 15, 2015 , 7:00 PM
...
The team also showed off new images of unexpectedly smooth surfaces on Pluto’s moon Charon—which, without an atmosphere, was expected to have an even more battered surface than Pluto. Radioactive elements in both bodies’ interiors could provide some of the heat needed for geological mountain building or ice flows that repave the surface. But Pluto, and especially Charon, are far too small for this heat to persist. The giant impact thought to have formed the two worlds could also provide a source of energy, but that probably happened billions of years ago.
...
NASA-JHUAPL-SwRI

Smooth surfaces on Pluto's moon Charon imply geological reworking in the recent past.

Geoffrey Collins, a planetary scientist at Wheaton College in Norton, Massachusetts, unaffiliated with the team, is amazed by the images. “Clearly we’re seeing internal activity on the surface of Pluto and Charon,” he says. “Something is pulling apart their ice crusts.” Collins is excited because there is no way to explain the activity with conventional models of heat loss. “If the Charon-Pluto impact happened more recently, all the problems would be solved,” he says.
...

Pluto is alive—but where is the heat coming from?

As the atmosphere warms it expands, so eventually it expands so much that these planet began to lose atmosphere and as they lose atmosphere they get colder.

So whatever had been causing these celestial bodies to heat up, while at the same time other inner planets and moons with an atmosphere were also undergoing global warming like Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, ad well as moons like Enceladus and Titan, in planets or rather dwarf planets like Pluto the atmosphere is already thin, the warming caused their atmosphere to expand and eventually the expanding atmosphere would be lost to space and hence the atmosphere would cool.

But planets with a thick and large atmospheric layer would continue to expand their atmosphere, although the "anthropogenic climate cult" would blame "climate change", the real culprit would be whatever had been causing other planets and moons with an atmosphere in the Solar System to heat up and expand. But the atmosphere of such planets would also reach a point in which they will begin to cool and contract, and it seems that Earth has also reached that point. Which again, it would be more proof that the heating/warming had been caused by some source within the limits of the Solar System or even right outside the Solar System.

However, back in 2010 something strange happened with Earth's Thermosphere as it contracted the magnitude of the collapse was 2-3 times greater than low solar activity alone could explain.

July 15, 2010: NASA-funded researchers are monitoring a big event in our planet's atmosphere. High above Earth's surface where the atmosphere meets space, a rarefied layer of gas called "the thermosphere" recently collapsed and now is rebounding again.

"This is the biggest contraction of the thermosphere in at least 43 years," says John Emmert of the Naval Research Lab, lead author of a paper announcing the finding in the June 19th issue of the Geophysical Research Letters (GRL). "It's a Space Age record."

The collapse happened during the deep solar minimum of 2008-2009—a fact which comes as little surprise to researchers. The thermosphere always cools and contracts when solar activity is low. In this case, however, the magnitude of the collapse was two to three times greater than low solar activity could explain.

"Something is going on that we do not understand," says Emmert.
...

A Puzzling Collapse of Earth's Upper Atmosphere

But this can also be explained by the increase in comic radiation the Solar System, mostly in the form of high energetic particles, has been receiving.

Stratospheric Radiation on Earth Continues to Increase.

Cosmic Rays, especially X-Rays, The Solar System is Receiving Have been Increasing

Then we had the event in 2014 in which Earth's magnetic field weakening increased to ten times faster what it used to be.

Earth's Magnetic Field Is Weakening 10 Times Faster Now

As to what will happen next? Either cooling or warming will occur. We have to keep an eye on space and see what happens.

originally posted by: wdkirk
Al Gore warned us about this. Had we only listened.

Al Gore is an elitist who has been making money from the "human induced climate change scare."

He is part of the globalists who have been scaring mankind into implementing drastic changes that will make western nations like the U.S. into third world countries meanwhile Al Gore and his elitist pals become richer...

We are traveling through an area where there was a super nova.

Dr. Anton Wallner, nuclear physicist at Australia National University Research School of Physics and Engineering, has been leading research on Earth’s deposits of Iron-60 which he notes are “a million-billion times less abundant than the iron that exists naturally on Earth.” And yet, Iron-60 deposits have been found all over the world. Dotted throughout the Local Bubble carved out of the ISM, there are some denser regions or clouds thought to be made up of remaining material from the supernovas themselves which contain Iron-60. Iron-60 has a half-life of 2.6 million years fully decaying in 15 million so any traces of the isotope had to be created and deposited on Earth within that period which coincides to when Earth was within the Local Bubble. Earth likely passed through these clouds of debris in the past leading to Iron-60 raining onto our planet and into the oceans. But while ancient supernova debris is falling to Earth, not all of it fell in ancient times. In fact, Antarctic snows revealed Iron-60 that landed on Earth within the last 20 years. Supernova debris is falling on Earth right now meaning we may currently be passing though one of those debris clouds seeded throughout the Local Bubble…called the Local Cloud.

www.universetoday.com...

There are bubbles of gas and probably heat that have been around us for about 30,000 years.
The Solar system is most likely going through a heated area right now due to the super nova.

This would/could explain the heating of the planets.

a reply to: Darkblade71

Which could explain the warming on Earth..

Nobody that I have ever known, is from Pluto.
Please explain to me? Why Pluto's "atmosphere", is something, I should be concerned about?

originally posted by: murphy22
Nobody that I have ever known, is from Pluto.
Please explain to me? Why Pluto's "atmosphere", is something, I should be concerned about?

The inference is that every celestial body making up our system is experiencing a similar change in circumstances and so terrestrial warming is not being influenced significantly by human endeavours, thus global initiatives to change our habits have an objective other then what is being presented for our consumption.

I hope that brings you some perspective.

It’s all about control.

Socialise the expenses, privatise the profit.

a reply to: Dalamax

Exactly. Too many people who keep pushing for "green changes" have ZERO idea what their drastic changes will actually do. First these drastic changes WILL NOT either stop, nor mitigate Climate Change on Earth. Second, these drastic changes are being done and sought by the elitists/globalists to re-distribute the world's wealth, or rather the wealth of western countries, to transform them into third world nations. These drastic changes will not help any poor nation in the world, but will make sure all nations, except China and maybe a few other countries, become as poor as dirt.

Throughout the years we have had these globalists admit that these changes won't stop and won't mitigate Climate Change, but they keep pushing them and leftists worldwide are brainwashed enough to continue to support such disaster. The only people that will benefit from "green changes" are already "rich elitists/globalists" who want to possess all of the world's wealth, want to control every aspect of people's lives, and don't want any regular Joe or Jane to partake on a "free market," or to have free will.

Here is an example of an ATS member "believing" that mankind can even destroy/manipulate "the Solar System." He/she seems to think that mankind can destroy the entire Solar System. This is how delusional and brainwashed people have become.

originally posted by: nerbot

Our solar system may have survived, rocks, gasses, metals etc... but what about the LIFE within it?

Gina McCarthy, Obama's EPA and now China/Russia first Biden's first National Climate Advisor, had to admit in 2016 that the drastic "Green policies" and changes that the Obama administration wanted would not stop, nor mitigate Climate Change. Her argument was that even though the implementation of the most drastic changes these elitists/globalists want for the U.S., which was AND IS to completely stop all manufacturing and all emissions of atmospheric CO2 in the U.S. the most these changes could lower global temperatures is by a whooping 0.01C.

The thing is that even natural changes in temperature are and can be larger than 0.01C. So there is ZERO evidence these drastic changes would even lower global temperatures by 0.01C.

What Gina McCarthy argued back then is that we shouldn't think of these drastic changes as a way to lower world temperatures but rather as a way to implement a new global economy...



EPA Chief concedes climate rule; it's about 'reinventing a global economy'

UN IPCC Official Admits 'We Redistribute World's Wealth By Climate Policy'

World needs ‘brain washing’ on climate change, Jerry Brown says at Vatican

Every single person who is in favor of these drastic changes has ZERO idea how different their LIVES and the life of everyone on this planet will be once these drastic changes are implemented.

Imagine all nations being Venezuela right now. People in every single nation fighting for whatever food is available and the globalists/elitists want you to eat. Having ZERO choice on what food you can eat and how many times you, your family, including your children will eat. Billions of people will starve, and since these globalists/elitists don't want "regular Joes and Janes" to own any farmland, NO SINGLE PERSON will be allowed to even grow our own food.

That's the future that globalists/elitists want. A Future in which they will completely control every aspect of people's lives. A future in which 99.9% of the people in the world will be suffering, will have no future and no control over our lives.

This is what every single one of you who are in favor of "Green policies" are cheering for. Climate Change will continue to happen, and yes it will get worse but not because of anthropogenic CO2, but because the Solar System has been moving into a different section of the Galaxy that has been causing these changes.

Even back in 1978 French astronomers were already postulating that if we/the Solar System/Earth were ever to enter this interstellar Cloud it would cause dramatic Climate Change.

The only thing they were mistaken about was when would the Solar System, including Earth of course, would enter this cloud.

Title:
Is the solar system entering a nearby interstellar cloud
Authors:
Vidal-Madjar, A.; Laurent, C.; Bruston, P.; Audouze, J.
...
Abstract
....................
Observational arguments in favor of such a cloud are presented, and implications of the presence of a nearby cloud are discussed, including possible changes in terrestrial climate. It is suggested that the postulated interstellar cloud should encounter the solar system at some unspecified time in the near future and might have a drastic influence on terrestrial climate in the next 10,000 years.

Is the solar system entering a nearby interstellar cloud

Back then and for several decades it was thought it would take us around 10,000-50,000 years to reach this interstellar cloud, but newer research states we will be completely inside this cloud in about 88 years.

Date: May 24, 2010
...
Is the Sun going to enter a million-degree galactic cloud of interstellar gas soon? A U.S.-Polish team of scientists suggests that the ribbon of enhanced emissions of energetic neutral atoms, discovered last year by the NASA Small Explorer satellite IBEX, could be explained by a geometric effect due to the approach of the Sun to the boundary between the Local Cloud of interstellar gas and another cloud of a very hot gas called the Local Bubble. If this hypothesis is correct, IBEX is catching matter from a hot neighboring interstellar cloud, which the Sun might enter in a hundred years.

Ribbon at edge of our solar system: Will the Sun enter a million-degree cloud of interstellar gas?

Throughout the 18 years I have been a member of ATS, some of us, including myself, have been attempting to illuminate people as to the truth behind these "Green Changes/policies" that have been pushed and are being pushed to this day. But even though we have demonstrated that the AGW activists, passing as scientists, have been lying about Climate Change, even though we have proven time and again that they have erased raw temperature data, they have manipulated and changed temperature data, and have used scare tactics to make people "believe" in AGHW; (Anthropogenic Global Warming AKA Human induced Climate Change) we keep seeing many leftists AKA pro-AGW ATS members continue to cheer for these drastic changes while still believing the delusion that mankind can stop these natural changes.

originally posted by: ElectricUniverse
a reply to: Dalamax

Gina McCarthy, Obama's EPA and now China/Russia first Biden's first National Climate Advisor, had to admit in 2016 that the drastic "Green policies" and changes that the Obama administration wanted would not stop, nor mitigate Climate Change. Her argument was that even though the implementation of the most drastic changes these elitists/globalists want for the U.S., which was AND IS to completely stop all manufacturing and all emissions of atmospheric CO2 in the U.S. the most these changes could lower global temperatures is by a whooping 0.01C.

The thing is that even natural changes in temperature are and can be larger than 0.01C. So there is ZERO evidence these drastic changes would even lower global temperatures by 0.01C.

I remember when the Paris climate accords were signed and a lot of Obama sycophants were acting like he personally saved the world. But I also remember a few environmentalists were actually pretty pissed because it didn't do anything. The estimates of the impact the agreement would have--even if fully implemented, which it was never going to be--were negligible. Of course finding any reference to this now is like looking for a needle in a haystack. Big Tech buries information like that.

I share your frustration with not being able to get through to people. It's not even that complicated. It's not like they're too dumb to understand it. It really is brainwashing. I hate to say it but we lost this battle decades ago. The time to fight back was when socialist indoctrination was taking over academia and the media. That ship has long since sailed. For every person you convince, they're brainwashing a hundred more.