It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: SortingHat
They said after they lost the Trump trials they had more up their sleeves to throw at him like the villains when they say they will be back for more and usually do something very devious. Then suddenly out of nowhere China had this 'mysterious' virus that spread rapidly. I think the weapon was meant for Hong Kong's protestors remember those people packing the streets?
I don't think Liberals liked all those nations wanting out of the EU and not be part of BRICS anymore.
originally posted by: alexandrae
I think Coviid is a form of warfare not started by the U.S, but by another country,
I think our scientusts are smart. We the people of the U.S. are tough and will make it through.
Yes...I am very worried, about the young people they are our future; and their formula may be causing autisum.
It seems to me at this time in history....many real truths are being revealed..about greedy money people; money is their god and human life does not matter to them.
I am a female and really there is something wrong with many men globally after all they commit most of the criminal activity, and destructiion and violence on planet earth.
During a meeting of her war council in June 1482, as she plotted the siege of a town in Granada, Queen Isabella went into labor. After a brutal 36 hours, only one of the twins she bore lived, and, days later, her troops returned bloodied and defeated. But the 31-year-old queen proved as tenacious in war as in labor. In less than a decade, Isabella had taken Granada from the Moors, unifying Spain, and launching the rise of history’s first global superpower.
Nowadays Isabella is less known for her conquests than for having paid Christopher Columbus to sail the oceans—maybe because we don’t often think of queens as warmongers.
But apparently, they were. In fact, between 1480 and 1913, Europe’s queens were 27% more likely than its kings to wage war, according to a National Bureau of Economics working paper (paywall). And like Isabella, queens were also more likely to amass new territory during their reigns, found the paper’s authors, economists Oeindrila Dube and S.P. Harish.
The first clue comes from the fact that, of all European sovereigns, married queens were the most bellicose, launching more wars than unmarried queens, and kings of all types. This might be because, thanks to gender norms, women rulers tended to benefit more from marriage alliances than kings. Married queens were likelier than kings to wage war alongside allies, often their spouses’ nations. And queens frequently roped their husbands into helping rule—something that kings hardly ever did with their wives.
Gender norms of the day edged even queens as powerful as Isabella out of the military sphere; though she planned military campaigns and sometimes rallied her troops decked out in armor, it was Ferdinand who led them into battle. Since male royalty tended to hold positions in their home militaries and had experience with state affairs, a queen often gained a husband and a trusted supporter to lead her most important institution. This sharing of duties sometimes made a queendom run more effectively. Plus, especially in earlier days, it could be hard for a queen to find people to trust. Family members were usually out of the question. (In those days, you never knew who among your kin was plotting a bloody overthrow.) As for husbands, most states banned them from succeeding their spouse unless they had already been named co-monarch. Because they weren’t in competition with each other, queens and their husbands could cut through the intrigue and trust each other. This often brought greater stability to a queen’s reign, while broader alliances and collaborative rule expanded her capacity to organize and finance war.
And starting in the 1500s, that became increasingly clutch. Leaps in weapons technology were making other factors besides the symbolism of leading an army far more critical to conquest—namely, money, men, and resources. Consider that between 1550 and 1780, Austria’s armed forces grew 28-fold.
originally posted by: alexandrae
I think Coviid is a form of warfare not started by the U.S, but by another country
Dr. Anthony Fauci, the U.S. government’s top infectious disease specialist, warned in early 2017 that a “surprise outbreak” would occur during the Trump administration, and he said that more needed to be done to prepare for a pandemic.
“There is no question that there will be a challenge to the coming administration in the arena of infectious diseases,” he said in a speech titled “Pandemic Preparedness in the Next Administration” at Georgetown University Medical Center. He delivered it just days before Trump was inaugurated on Jan. 20, 2017.
Fauci, who has overseen the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) since 1984, warned that looming health challenges would involve both chronic diseases ― ones already ongoing ― as well as “a surprise outbreak.”
“Why don’t we blow the system up? I mean, obviously we can’t just turn off the spigot on the system that we have and say ‘Oh hey, everyone in the world should get this new vaccine we haven’t given to anyone yet’ but there must be some way.”
originally posted by: xuenchen
The politically planned pandemic was/is the biggest NWO congame victory in History (so far) 😉
originally posted by: Silcone Synapse
a reply to: SortingHat
Depends on who you think "THEY" are.
Some folks seemed to "know" we were going to have a "pandemic" before hand-That is certain.
Fauci is one such person IMO-
Dr. Anthony Fauci, the U.S. government’s top infectious disease specialist, warned in early 2017 that a “surprise outbreak” would occur during the Trump administration, and he said that more needed to be done to prepare for a pandemic.
“There is no question that there will be a challenge to the coming administration in the arena of infectious diseases,” he said in a speech titled “Pandemic Preparedness in the Next Administration” at Georgetown University Medical Center. He delivered it just days before Trump was inaugurated on Jan. 20, 2017.
Fauci, who has overseen the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) since 1984, warned that looming health challenges would involve both chronic diseases ― ones already ongoing ― as well as “a surprise outbreak.”
www.huffingtonpost.co.uk...
Then there is the question of did certain people/institutes/agencies actually work towards making something like the above happen..Certain comments/info would suggest that "they" did indeed do that,or wished to be able to at the very least-
The comments of those at the Milken institute conference of (pre pandemic)2019 point in that direction.
“Why don’t we blow the system up? I mean, obviously we can’t just turn off the spigot on the system that we have and say ‘Oh hey, everyone in the world should get this new vaccine we haven’t given to anyone yet’ but there must be some way.”
whiskeytangotexas.com...
The "some way" they go on to speculate,could be a "disruptive agent" in the form of a novel avian flu from China..
At the very least IMO,certain people wanted the pandemic to happen-in order to save 10 years of clinical trials which could instead be bypassed or done "on the fly" during the pandemic,with a captive group of subjects-thats us.
Now they have forced the world into a system where YOU are the clinical trial.
Don't expect the covid vax will be the last thing they wish to experiment on you with-they have generated a new version of reality,which we are all supposed to submit to.
Some would say this is benevolent and helpful for our health.
I would say that it is about the removal of free will,and the beginning of the borg-something else they brag about creating in the form of a technological authoritarian society,which by the way we are hurtling toward at break neck speed.