Some of the best UFO vids

a reply to: JimOberg


Please address my question regarding firing of thrusters or dumping of wastes during EVA, cause it seems like you are sidestepping and attempting to attack me as a person.

In general yes, to your question. Though it would depend on the shape and area of the object, and in what way the forces pointed that resulted in it coming off a space vehicle.

originally posted by: curbcrawler
a reply to: JimOberg

....cause it seems like you are sidestepping and attempting to attack me as a person.
...

If you consider disagreement with your statements as an attack on you as a person, I conclude you don't show the maturity to discuss a controversial topic productively.

On shuttle missions, attitude thrusters remained in operation during EVAs, which usually were in safe zones inside the payload bay.

a reply to: JimOberg

Sir, you were previously commenting about my knowledge or the things I shared in a bit nasty manner and not to the point of topics at hand, thats why I mentioned it.

I am reading that they are only firing about once a month or even much less than that, it stands to reason they do not fire , nor waste is dumped during spacewalks ( Extra Vehicular Activity) .

duplicate

I always liked the gif that is presented in the reply on this page for the "Turkish UFO" 👍cruise ship 👍

originally posted by: curbcrawler
a reply to: JimOberg

Sir, you were previously commenting about my knowledge or the things I shared in a bit nasty manner and not to the point of topics at hand, thats why I mentioned it. I am reading that they are only firing about once a month or even much less than that, it stands to reason they do not fire , nor waste is dumped during spacewalks ( Extra Vehicular Activity) .

Your definition of 'reason' and 'reality' differ from my own. Enjoy your imaginary reality.

a reply to: curbcrawler

wanted to know what you think of the footage from the "secret of skin walker ranch " show

they have now got footage of UAP's over the mesa

they also detected an object tailing them underneath the chopper when they were taking measurements of the site directly over the triangle as it was messing with their radar ground height altimeter and jumped from 1500 ft to 42ft

definitely strange things happening around that ranch and the UAP's are coming out to play

a reply to: sapien82

Thank you so much for the heads up bro.

I'm following it to some degree (YT).
I find it massively interesting and mysterious, sadly I didn't check all the episodes yet (dont have cable and time is a bit short).
I will check for those new sightings .

I can tell you that I find one of the aspects mind-boggling, if true: science teams notice their equipment malfunctioning. Also with science teams outside of the groups working there now too, as has been reported. Though honestly it wouldn't surprise me that much, keeping the information in mind about UFOs de-activating nukes, which is a sure sign of incredibly deep knowledge/technology and intelligence, should these phenomena have any links, which I think we can assume is the case.

There is even a possible scientific explanation surfacing how sightings are more in numbers there than at any other regular place.
It could have to do with the geology which could act as a natural antenna, possibly in combination of what is under the ground there. Or what is cloaked in the sky. Very mysterious stuff and when come to think of it, possibly dangerous to tread on

A more critical point is how "show-like" it feels, and to what degree the information/data shared is true. But I understand they have to make it like this for financial reasons too, and I feel the efforts are done with good heart, which I find something amazing and definitely am supportive of these inquiries!!!

It needs to continue with even more analysis, even more openminded scientists like signal experts/engineers, experimental physicists.

The 3rd video might be space debris. The 5th video is to blurry to even tell what they really are. The other videos I seen before are definitely bizarre and strange UFO's or UAP's is now the popular term for them now.

originally posted by: Archivalist
a reply to: curbcrawler

Your first video is clearly a bird and the "ships" it is deploying are cloaca droppings.

I don't see any reason these couldn't be human manufactured drones. Assuming this isn't CGI. (No Mach 60+ speeds)

Things zip by the ISS all the time, and are captured on camera. Generally it's just ice shards from the outside of the station. Rarely it will be another satellite or space junk.

The Turkey video was debunked years ago, it is the bow of a ship* recorded at night time. *ocean/pirate kind

The last video is very clearly external lens refraction. If you don't believe any of my assessments, I can pull the specific frames that support my assertions.

This is a classic example of the worst kind of nonsense skepticism cynical awful lazy lousy answers to the UFO or UAP phenomenon I have ever seen..... This is the kind of crap we have to put up with radical skeptics..

originally posted by: curbcrawler
a reply to: JimOberg

Sir, you were previously commenting about my knowledge or the things I shared in a bit nasty manner and not to the point of topics at hand, thats why I mentioned it. I am reading that they are only firing about once a month or even much less than that, it stands to reason they do not fire ,
.....

On shuttle, thrusters were firing a dozen times an hour. Whereever did you get the idea it happened once a month?

a reply to: Jobeycool

"More anomalies on ISS stream" is the only spaceflight one, so I'd like to look at it more closely. What's the date/time of the video so I can look up the crew audio and the vehicle activities, please. "

I remember about 14 years ago constantly going through YouTube for ufo videos. There was such a vast display.

Today you cant do that. Everything shown today is a generic pile of ..

a reply to: curbcrawler

I couldnt agree more , skinwalker should be a site of scientific interest , especially if the data they are collecting points to some high energy fields and emissions , what is producing that and why?

Also it seems to be a area of what i like to think of as scientific interest for UAP's
like maybe that portal or whatever it is , is of scientific interest to these UAP's
and they are also here to study i.

I definitely agree that more people should be researching it together.

All of these videos are pretty bad except for the nuclear plant.

Thats the only one where the alleged ufos make sudden changes of speed and direction that would be very hard to achieve realistically with our technology. The rest can be anything basically because they lack that kind of characteristic.

The 3 times ive seen ufos in real life made an impact mostly because they all showed those characteristics.They always were multiple ufos at the same time that had a very steady and seemingly determined flight path while all either speeding up suddenly, following eachothers direction, dissapearing and reapearing, making very sharp sudden turns in direction while all being completely silent and i guessed 300-1500 feet in the air. All were solid bright red/orange colored balls. Like the color of an alarm pistols flare maybe a little brighter, but no flashing, so more solid and also not really lighting up surroundings they flew over.

a reply to: ElitePlebeian

I respect your opinion and understand where you are coming from.

I don't really agree that just those characteristics are telling of the "others", or if those characteristics are not seen, it is bad footage. While it is a decent position.
In my opinion the invoking of possible terrestrial technology is used too much, its hard or even impossible to counter, yet there is no real basis for believing that might be the case, using contexts or logic.

Really appreciate the sharing of your experience.

I had a few sightings myself, a major one that stood out was about 6 years ago. There was a large phenomena of lights in the night sky, above or somewhat in the clouds. It was near a rural area and possibly above a very big lake in my country, and seen by many others and it appeared even on some news. Of course that little buzz or follow-ups disappear just as fast as it came.
There were about 6 big white lights (I would estimate each about 40 to 100 meters) spinning ABOVE/IN the clouds very rapidly in a circle, like a carrousel on steroids, and swerving a little bit about a "center of mass", it even lasted for about an hour. Sadly it was too dark, far away and faint for my camera to be able to pick it up

spam

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win