Russia adopts a law on fines for promoting non-traditional sexual relations

a reply to: tamusan

From this day forward all romance novels and rom-coms will be banned on punishment of death. Fabio is to be named an enemy of state and may God have mercy on your soul if you include a meet-cute in anything.

TextUh huh. no this is because putin is a Self hating closeted gay and he dont want to be tempted by men. some of the biggest macho guys have been gay.

Also that bill does criminalize showing their gayness in public if you really think about it. Another hitler-esque thing puti poots is doing.

a reply to: yuppa

thanks for the laugh. i needed it. speak your truth, sweetheart. go off.

a reply to: Xcalibur254



I hope you meant that to be funny, because I got a good chuckle from it. I could do without romance novels, romcoms and especially Fabio.

originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: 20Eyes1974

Ok, but the topic is Russia wanting to expand a law that already persecutes people in non-traditional relationships. If you know Russia sucks, why would you immediately come into the thread to support the law?

because its my right. and i support it. cope.

a reply to: Xcalibur254

Sounds good. I assume those books are opening themselves and forcing people to read them, right?

If not, you're just displaying a truckload of ignorance. There's a world of difference between choosing to read something and having propaganda about it shown everywhere one turns.

TheRedneck

a reply to: 20Eyes1974

because its my right. and i support it. cope.

And I support you. Thank you for (trying to) bring a little reason into the thread.


TheRedneck

a reply to: carewemust

This made me chuckle lol.



/ontopic

This woke nonsense is everywhere, advertising, magazines, you can't look around anymore and be confronted with this garbage. Always bam in your face.

I had to explain to my kids what females and males genetically are and how things cannot be changed. School made up a nice story, about feelz and stuff.

If there could be a law that stops this indoctrination. I'm for it.

originally posted by: RussianTroll

originally posted by: Skepticape
You said it’s adopted this policy in the headline but go on to say it’s only been submitted. Huge difference. Authoritarianism on either side of the isle on this issue is wrong. Pretty ugly stuff.

a reply to: RussianTroll

Authoritarians are now only in Britain. There, the queen really rules ..... I forgot how many decades. And the upper house of the so-called parliament is generally hereditary.

If you’re issuing fines for promoting consensual relationships, you might be an authoritarian. Don’t pretend your brand is somehow different.

"But somehow it is perfectly acceptable for someone who is gay to say, "Hi! I'm _____ and I'm gay. If you are too, nice to meet you; if not, go kill yourself, you hater!"

I can't even tell you how many times a week gays come up to me and say these exact words. I agree. Enough is enough. LOL.


a reply to: TheRedneck

“ LQBGTWDFERYTS+=- community teachers” ?? — You clearly have some erroneous preconceived notions about this topic, if you think any “teachers” are to be concerned about — I’m so sure, as if — Talk about a ‘nothing-burger’ — there is no there, there.
Furthermore, this is not something that any teacher, anywhere, is (or could even if they wanted to) impart on students. Your fear is so unwarranted & is often seen promulgated among certain less-than-informed right wing ‘groups’ that are often associated with scapegoating & usually an absurd ‘boogeyman’ du jour such as immigrants, racial minorities, religious minorities, & most recently Trans people.
Trust me, you don’t have anything to worry about, & I’m sure your kids can handle the truth when it comes to the fact that humanity is quite a diverse kaleidoscope.

a reply to: Sander1976

Remember that time a gay person read all those books written by straight people. And suddenly turned straight?

Remember that time Putin sent Desantis a box of Valentine chocolates that he stole from A widow in Kyiv?

Remember that time the Nazis in Ruzzia passed a law that replaced the word witch, with gay?
This is obviously a law that will allow point and shoot criminality. It’s not about gay.
It’s about an easy excuse to persecute anyone. Just say gay and they take you away.

a reply to: DirtyBird442

Your first post, welcome to ATS Meet all the people with different ideas, thoughts etc.

Are you actually saying teachers don't indoctrinate little kids?

So according to you I live in fear and my concerns are irrelevant? It is all a rainbow burger?

Then you push me into the right wing corner, so typical.

I told my kids the truth, you know xx and xy, chromosomes and stuff. There are females and males. You know the old fashioned females, the ones with wombs. What is your truth exactly?

originally posted by: 20Eyes1974
Honestly, im sick of it being shoved in me and my kids faces.
a reply to: Tekner

Damn, where do you hang out?
That’s a lot of shoving.

a reply to: DirtyBird442

this is not something that any teacher, anywhere, is (or could even if they wanted to) impart on students.

It's amazing to me that they try so hard, then. How do you explain that? Are all the people who are pushing alternate lifestyles in the classroom absolute idiots in your opinion?

Are you saying this law has no effect, then, since the thing it makes illegal isn't happening and cannot happen even if someone wanted it to? If that is true, why are you angry about it? It's not even in your country.

Your fear is so unwarranted & is often seen promulgated among certain less-than-informed right wing ‘groups’ that are often associated with scapegoating & usually an absurd ‘boogeyman’ du jour such as immigrants, racial minorities, religious minorities, & most recently Trans people.

Oh, OK, so it's all just a lot of the groups you don't like who are fighting against something that cannot possibly exist, but which you support anyway?

You do read what you write, right?

TheRedneck

It is just a "fine". It's not like they're going to face a firing squad. Can you go to jail in the U.S.A. for not wearing a seatbelt?.. Well?... You can. If you wanna get stupid about it. It's not like you deprived someone of "life, liberty or happiness". It's not that you even committed a "crime". But you didn't do what your servants told you to do. But you will only get a fine, for not doing what, (your paid employees) told you to do. . . See how the servants run the house?


Good on Russia.

"Non traditional sexual relations" doesn't do anything good for a country. Especially one with a "social healthcare system".
I don't see a problem with this.
Now if Russian politicians were really smart?...They'd require a "sin tax" or "insurance" program. And invest their money into the "publicly traded" "law" they just passed. That's how American politicians do it.
It's all very moral and all about "freedom", "liberty" and stuff!


If you ain't got the balls to clean your own house?
You certainly ain't got the right to bitch about someone elses house.

originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: Tekner

Except it's more than that. When the law that's currently in place was passed, the first conviction came because someone was holding a sign that said "Freedom to the Gays and Lesbians of Russia. Down With Fascists and Homophobes."

Other notable instances of convictions include a newspaper that included the quote, "effective proof that homosexuality is normal," when they ran a story on a former teacher that had been targeted by Right-Wing extremists for his sexuality and a woman that runs an online support group for homosexual teens. Let's not also forget about when an iPhone shaped memorial to Steve Jobs was removed because Tim Cook said he was proud to be gay.

So yes, this new law would effectively criminalize being gay in public.

What constitutes "being gay in public"? I'm pretty sure it's a crime if I am having traditional sex in public most places. Unless there is some other concept of "being gay in public" that I am not aware of, then I see no difference.

a reply to: Halfswede

No country in the world has a crime against being happy/gay in public.

But even evil "Civilizations" have laws against unnatural acts.

Like a broken clock. It's right, twice a day.

a reply to: Halfswede

2 men or women kissing in public,holding hands in a certain way,that sort of stuff. wearing the gay flag or colors.(thats what russia is against personally i dont care about anyones sexuality.)

a reply to: yuppa

What people do in private is nobody's business. As long as no crime against anyone is being committed.

But civilizations have a responsibility to uphold public standards. Standards can not be allowed to change. Even two "straight" people can get in trouble for "indecency".

No use in having social standards if they're not enforced or adhered to. People have to know their limits. No matter how mentally ill they are.

Stop being a criminal degenerate and you should be ok.

a reply to: Tekner