WHO Forced To Back Down After Numerous Nations Rejected Pandemic Treaty?

So not seen this reported anywhere else, is it true? The best I can ascertain they will revisit the proposal in 2024. Or is this blog overreacting to just normal WHO procedures?


helenastales.weebly.com...

WHO Forced To Back Down After Numerous Nations Rejected Pandemic Treaty

The World Health Assembly convened last month to put forth International Health Resolutions they hoped would be adopted by give them medical control over WHO member states.
However, the pandemic treaty was soon derailed when on May 25th the African delegation led by Botswana rejected the initiative on behalf of its 47 AFRO members.

At their request, a new working group was convened to make ‘technical recommendations on the proposed amendments’ which will re-submitted along with the Pandemic Treaty, at the 77th Health Assembly meeting in 2024.”

a reply to: putnam6

Glad to see someone had enough sense to realize putting life and death decisions in bureaucratic hands might not be in thier best interest.

originally posted by: 727Sky
a reply to: putnam6

Glad to see someone had enough sense to realize putting life and death decisions in bureaucratic hands might not be in thier best interest.

Bureaucratic hands controlled by the CCP.

a reply to: putnam6

You're confusing 2 separate issues.

I wrote a thread about this issue recently, here.

This specifically relates to the International Health Regulation 2005. What was voted down were dystopian amendments proposed by the US, surprise surprise. But, what they did vote for illegally was to shorten the time within which new regulations come into force, 12 months now not 24. This was only a battle won, not the war.

The WHO Pandemic Treaty is currently being discussed and is, infrequently open to public comment. They never open it for public comment long and never advertise that they're going to. I managed to get my 2c in the last time, but either so many people jumped in their servers crashed, or there were so many negative comments they pulled it themselves.

Think of it this way. The IHR is the legal mechanism that gives unlimited power to the WHO to determine who is guilty, the Pandemic Treaty will determine the sentence or method of punishment.

Neither of them are good. The WHO, UN et al should be torn down, the WEF should be tried for crimes against humanity.

This planned failure was a good measurement tool for the future "agreements".

Now they know more about the limits and how to eliminate the limits !!! 🚬

originally posted by: myselfaswell
a reply to: putnam6

You're confusing 2 separate issues.

I wrote a thread about this issue recently, here.

This specifically relates to the International Health Regulation 2005. What was voted down were dystopian amendments proposed by the US, surprise surprise. But, what they did vote for illegally was to shorten the time within which new regulations come into force, 12 months now not 24. This was only a battle won, not the war.

The WHO Pandemic Treaty is currently being discussed and is, infrequently open to public comment. They never open it for public comment long and never advertise that they're going to. I managed to get my 2c in the last time, but either so many people jumped in their servers crashed, or there were so many negative comments they pulled it themselves.

Think of it this way. The IHR is the legal mechanism that gives unlimited power to the WHO to determine who is guilty, the Pandemic Treaty will determine the sentence or method of punishment.

Neither of them are good. The WHO, UN et al should be torn down, the WEF should be tried for crimes against humanity.

I apologize I didn't see the earlier thread, have no doubt the UN and WHO are money-wasting entities in their current format, if not outright corrupt. Not a fan of the WEF either.

originally posted by: myselfaswell
a reply to: putnam6

You're confusing 2 separate issues.

I wrote a thread about this issue recently, here.

This specifically relates to the International Health Regulation 2005. What was voted down were dystopian amendments proposed by the US, surprise surprise. But, what they did vote for illegally was to shorten the time within which new regulations come into force, 12 months now not 24. This was only a battle won, not the war.

The WHO Pandemic Treaty is currently being discussed and is, infrequently open to public comment. They never open it for public comment long and never advertise that they're going to. I managed to get my 2c in the last time, but either so many people jumped in their servers crashed, or there were so many negative comments they pulled it themselves.

Think of it this way. The IHR is the legal mechanism that gives unlimited power to the WHO to determine who is guilty, the Pandemic Treaty will determine the sentence or method of punishment.

Neither of them are good. The WHO, UN et al should be torn down, the WEF should be tried for crimes against humanity.

If only the WHO,UN, WEF etc all were taken to court. Could this be possible with enough lawyers and a class-action suit?
I don't think Reiner Fuellmich is making much progress , and it could be all just more theater
The last two years I'm in a constant slumber. I have not been as productive and certainly not as happy as before, I doubt things ever will return to how they were.