It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
“You always don’t want to think badly about people or organizations that seem to be engaged in good deeds. But let’s take a sensible look at the activities of the so-called foreign agents.
To begin with, let's imagine that a Russian structure or a Russian citizen created a non-governmental organization in the United States and began to hit one point hard. Raise topics that are extremely resonant and escalate social tension. For example, an NGO that deals with cases of illegal use of weapons by the police against non-whites in the United States or school shootings. In fact, aimed at inciting social discord, undermining the foundations of American society, insulting citizens. How long would such a structure, organized by Russian persons, live there with all the vaunted American democracy? I think she would have been slammed within a day. And if someone managed to do something there in the field of human rights, they would initiate criminal cases with terms of imprisonment for decades. They would arrest her foreign founders, who are in the States, and block her accounts. Would be persecuted all over the world.
And all this is within the framework of the Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA) - the law on the registration of foreign agents, adopted back in 1938, according to which any individuals and legal entities that directly or indirectly engage in political and financial activities in the interests of an external actor or states.
America very tightly guards its ideological, moral, economic and any other borders from foreign interference. Yes, and in other Western countries there is a practice of control over those who work at the expense of other states and protect their interests on foreign territory.
We, it turns out, are much more liberal than American legislators. And more humane in their convictions. Even by adopting the law on foreign agents, in essence, they did little to hinder the activities of various malicious NGOs in Russia.
Even now our law does not consider foreign agents to be criminals. We generally have a very neat legislation. In the United States and some European countries, in some cases, such an organization immediately falls under the ban. We don’t have this: it’s just that markings appear on her page or in mentions of her.
But if, for example, a publication receives money from abroad and expresses the interests of another country, our citizens, in fairness, should know about it. And then think for yourself how much you can trust such a source or assistant.
Admittedly, the control over foreign agents was rather formal. And now is the time to clean up. If they are engaged in activities directed against the country in such a difficult period, and receive money from our enemies for this, the response must be quick and tough. Stop talking nonsense, especially during the period of a special military operation and unlimited anti-Russian sanctions.
And at the legislative level, a more precise classification and stricter liability of foreign agents should be introduced.
A bill has already been submitted to the State Duma that will allow this to be done.
The activities of foreign agents must be placed under strict control and become transparent to our society.
There are also a number of legislative initiatives aimed at countering extremism and terrorism. They are just being considered. Here, too, there should be an immediate reaction. Once the court makes the necessary decision, the answer must be tough. Including the prohibition of public activities and criminal prosecution of persons working in the interests of a foreign state."
originally posted by: gortex
a reply to: RussianTroll
Calling Dmitry Medvedev a "former President" is a bit of a stretch don't you think?
Political tool of convenience or perhaps puppet President would be nearer the mark , no ?
originally posted by: RussianTroll
a reply to: LABTECH767
Your "Russians" who are unhappy with the "war in Ukraine" are mainly located in Britain, Israel, Poland, the Czech Republic and the Baltic states. You pay them money, they are unhappy with Russia's special operation in Ukraine. Everything is very simple)))
originally posted by: infolurker
originally posted by: RussianTroll
a reply to: LABTECH767
Your "Russians" who are unhappy with the "war in Ukraine" are mainly located in Britain, Israel, Poland, the Czech Republic and the Baltic states. You pay them money, they are unhappy with Russia's special operation in Ukraine. Everything is very simple)))
I would assume there are a ton of Russian parents that are not very happy since their children are dead. And for what?
originally posted by: RussianTroll
a reply to: IAMTAT
Russians in reality do not pay attention to such trifles.
originally posted by: IAMTAT
originally posted by: RussianTroll
a reply to: IAMTAT
Russians in reality do not pay attention to such trifles.
In the case of Obama saying to Medvedev: "Tell Vladimir, after my election I'll have more flexibility"...
we, in this country, tend to sit up and take notice when our leader is caught secretly making promises to belligerent foreign leaders.
originally posted by: RussianTroll
originally posted by: IAMTAT
originally posted by: RussianTroll
a reply to: IAMTAT
Russians in reality do not pay attention to such trifles.
In the case of Obama saying to Medvedev: "Tell Vladimir, after my election I'll have more flexibility"...
we, in this country, tend to sit up and take notice when our leader is caught secretly making promises to belligerent foreign leaders.
Who is our friend is a friend forever, my friends and I stand back to back. Well, if the enemy is, then sooner or later the Russians will come and ask for all the meanness.
originally posted by: IAMTAT
It's clear that Biden still considers the generous Elena Baturina a friend forever...as she was specifically excluded from punitive sanctions by the Biden administration.