It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Here’s what is really going on. All of the Pfizer and Moderna studies even for older children have shown zero serious COVID cases in the respective placebo groups. So in order to show efficacy, they created arbitrary benchmarks for presence of specific antibody levels generated by the shots. Putting aside the fact that high antibody levels without the proper T cell responses are actually not a good thing, fail to provide sterilizing immunity, and potentially cause autoimmune problems, the drug companies are caught in a catch-22 with dosage. Pfizer rightly tested those under 5 years old with a 3-milligram dose. But then it failed to stimulate a proper antibody response, which is why the company had to temporarily withdraw its application for EUA.
Moderna, on the other hand, figured they’d solve the problem by giving babies and toddlers a whopping 25-milligram dose. Even then, they misleadingly tethered their study of 2- to 4-year-olds to 5- and 6-year-olds in order to even register this illusory efficacy. However, any sane person on the FDA advisory committee should automatically nix this shot on account of its dangerous concentration for babies who, at just 6 months, average (for girls) as light as 16 pounds. Thus, while a 20-year-old adult weighing 180 pounds could be getting 0.55 micrograms per pound with the 100-microgram dose, a 6-month-old baby could be getting more than 1.5 micrograms per pound, roughly three times as potent. And we already know how problematic the adult concentration of Moderna was for many young adults, especially related to cardiac issues.
originally posted by: BelleEpoque
This is a bit off your topic but I'm so disgusted by FLEISHER ART MEMORIAL
Philadelphia had this wonderful subsidized art school for the public. Kids and adults have been going there since the 30's. I won't go into what a wonderful place it was because they now demand 5yr olds and up to be jabbed to take a class there. MONSTERS MONSTERS
ATTENTION: Proof of vaccination (ages 5+) and booster (ages 18+) is now required for Fleisher students and visitors. Please have your vaccination card in hand, or an image of your card ready to show on your phone. Read our COVID-19 community safety policies for more information.
Fleisher Art MemorialFleisher Art Memorial
The mission of the Fleisher Art Memorial is to make art accessible to everyone, regardless of economic means, background, or artistic experience.
LEARN MORE ABOUT OUR VISION
Fleishers.org
originally posted by: Wisenox
a reply to: v1rtu0s0
The covid spike isn't the only thing to worry about with those shots. Its everything else in the patent.
The patent has the capability to target the liver, cross the blood brain barrier, install carbon nanotubes, express or silence genes, create variants, install receptors for Hepatitis A, and a lot more.
No way on Earth would I allow that patent to be used on my child. They should only be including spike related processes, but they aren't.
originally posted by: vNex92
originally posted by: vonclod
I do not agree with vaxxing babies at all.
There is a reason why you dont vax babies with flu shots.
originally posted by: vonclod
originally posted by: vNex92
originally posted by: vonclod
I do not agree with vaxxing babies at all.
There is a reason why you dont vax babies with flu shots.
I think it's completely nonsensical. This is where I draw the line, besides lack of choice, that line already crossed.
originally posted by: v1rtu0s0
originally posted by: vonclod
originally posted by: vNex92
originally posted by: vonclod
I do not agree with vaxxing babies at all.
There is a reason why you dont vax babies with flu shots.
I think it's completely nonsensical. This is where I draw the line, besides lack of choice, that line already crossed.
Why not? I thought it was safe and effective?