It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
"The shark's body was in poor condition and there were signs of haemorrhage within the soft tissue around the pectoral fins which, coupled with the silt found in her stomach, suggested she may well have live stranded," Mr Barnett said.
"As far as we're aware, this is one of the first post-mortem examinations here in the UK of a Greenland shark and the first account of meningitis in this species."
Rob Deaville, project lead for the CSIP, said: "This unfortunate and extraordinary stranding has allowed us to get an insight into the life and death of a species we know little about.
news.sky.com...
originally posted by: gortex
a reply to: vonclod
I think sharks are one of the creatures nature got right first time and didn't need to change much , fascinating animals.
originally posted by: UpThenDown
a reply to: gortex
Another great story Thanks G man
Very interesting and thought provoking, how would a human be mentally if they lived for 500years
originally posted by: gortex
a reply to: UpThenDown
I doubt we'd be able to cope very well with parasites attaching themselves to our eyes , imagine the relief when it dies and the dispare when you pick up another one.
originally posted by: vonclod
Cool article
Such interesting sharks, maybe one of the longest living things, besides tree's..lol I have heard lobsters can get very old too, some tortoises get in the hundreds, croc's too.
I think sharks in general are very interesting to science. They don't get cancer, is I'm sure, very interesting to medical research!
originally posted by: VierEyes
originally posted by: vonclod
Cool article
Such interesting sharks, maybe one of the longest living things, besides tree's..lol I have heard lobsters can get very old too, some tortoises get in the hundreds, croc's too.
I think sharks in general are very interesting to science. They don't get cancer, is I'm sure, very interesting to medical research!
That sharks don't get cancer is a fallacy.
CANCER AND IMMUNITY GENES
To begin, the researchers looked at two shark immunity genes known as legumain and Bag1. Both these genes have counterparts in humans. In humans, their overexpression (producing more RNA protein than they should) is well known to be associated with a whole range of cancers. These genes in sharks, however, have changed as a result of evolutionary natural selection. Unlike those in humans, these two genes appear to give sharks antitumor properties.
“Several studies have demonstrated antitumor properties of shark-derived compounds in lab studies,” Shivji explains. “It’s intriguing that we are now seeing evidence of evolutionary adaptation in these specific shark immunity genes, which just happen also to be involved in promoting cancer in humans.”