US warship was chased by two car-size ‘balls of light’ UFOs

a reply to: StoutBroux
Well I just posted them for you to look at.
I don't see why you would discount something I say based on what can only be assumed to be ignorance.

a reply to: KellyPrettyBear

Hey kelly.

I dunno man. I haven't brought up the greenlady in years as it has nothing to do with uap. In fact i generally dont like to talk about the greenlady at all...and i have my reasons. Besides the greenlady and "uap" are not even about the same thing. (Although there may be tie ins) its like comparing mangos to a raccoon. Or a baseball player to a foul ball backstop or something kinda related but not at all really.

Its the other members that assume im somehow referencing the greenlady. Greenlady talk takes place in the aviation forum not the other way around since its aviation related. Funny how people gravitate to one aircraft out of so many and assume that must be what im talking about. Even stranger that people think everything other people are hinting at must match their assumption. And even weirder how their assumptions always tend to be so myopic and unyielding. People act like theres one thing or phenomena going on up there. There isnt.

Also Dont know where people think astr0 tipped me off on that particular bird, he didnt. Nice assumption though. Also, wasnt it some rule we werent supposed to talk about astr0? Well, im certainly not going to. Especially since its got nothing to do with the conversation. N13 why all the angst towards old bassybass? I dunno i thought i was a pretty nice guy.

While im chiming in kelly, i miss some of your old posts about sentient plasma. Although im not sold on the sentient part i believe some of your beliefs dovetailed with mine about consciousness. Anyhoo, thats a whole other wave in a whole other ocean i suppose.

If im being hush hush, well duh. Arent most folks when it comes to certain matters? You dont discuss certain things with the public or at all. You can however tell them theyve got it all wrong and that its not what THEY think theyre seeing. You know to like encourage people to widen their scope or something. You should look at what im doing as doing the ats community a favor. There should be a movement on ats where in everyone's signature it says "bassplyr for super moderator" or " bassplyr- just keeping it real yo"

As for the spelling of my name. I dont care if its all caps, lower case , hyphenated, spelled out completely or just bass. Im not a guy with a stick up my ass about how people write bassplyr. Im not even particular if people think the bass part is in reference to a musical instrument or a fish. Hell, bassybass. I kinda like that one! Scratch the above. Everybody call me bassybass from now on. Its got that early 2000s boy band kinda feel to it. I always wanted to be able to sing. Sadly when i try my cats all run away and my dog starts growling at me.

But yeah, the navy knows damn well what they are. Maybe not everybody IN the navy. But the navy its self does.

a reply to: neoholographic

I encourage people to discuss what they saw. With enough of the evidence out there the public might be able to understand it better.

a reply to: KellyPrettyBear

Your wife is right. Neither you or i have had good experiences in that arena.

a reply to: PorteurDeMort

Before i head off to work and cant reply for a few hours i wanted to take the time to thank you for the pic you posted.

a reply to: PorteurDeMort

Dont worry about it people can be pretty mean on ats sometimes.

a reply to: BASSPLYR

Nice response.

I hear you.

People make all these silly assumptions about me too.

Yes, I do hold a lot back. I decided to at a minimum to get that
info put in a university archive for the future, and that's already
done deal and ongoing. i'm really grateful for that opportunity.

It's not that i'm all that special, and in many ways I just used
old knowledge that's been around for a while.. but it got
actual results.

Regarding plasma;

it's rather interesting that while I was going on all bat#
about plasma, that other people were too.. and I got a piece
on 'plasma' published around the same time that others
(who I now know), also got pieces published about 'plasma'.

There was a real run on 'plasma' there for a while.

I remember back then, that things were all 'hush hush'..
and now you can just go to wikipedia and search for
'plasma stealth' and get some of it that easy!

I learned about 'plasma stealth' by listening to crabby
'plasma intelligences' not due to any aircraft knowledge.

I don't really listen to 'crabby plasma intelligences' any
more.. I mean, I could.. it's easy.. but my catchphrase
is 'consciousness is the trickster', and I've had enough
of being a 'useful idiot'.

I'd love to make a contribution to something neato
kean like quantum mechanics or something, not
roll around so much in 'mythology'.

Tell you what; if you start a fresh post on 'plasma'
I will contribute.

a reply to: BASSPLYR

on those 'tictacs'

my 'gut' tells me that they are simple 'radar reflectors'; something
of that sort.. semi-rigid lighter than air with a tiny payload.

that's what my gut tells me.

I'm frankly not interested in any of that 'tic tac stuff' as it's
literlaly NOTHING of the slightest value, in this or any other
universe.

It's horse puckey.

Now, as I've stated MANY times, there IS an associated
phenomenon from shamanism.

If you can get someone to believe there is a UFO (
or spirit or fairie or whatever the gimmick is), and
props can really help you know, then IN a SENSE
you can get them to 'summon' something real-ish
due to their excited imagination.

It's how shamanism works.. that frenzy.

All this fake UFO # causes a frenzy in people,
which causes some of them, SOMETIMES to actually
'summon' some #.

It's the 'accidental summoning hypothesis'.

I don't talk about it anymore.. people aren't
interested in the topic.

a reply to: ScrubCommander

If you attempt to 'modify reality directly' in the manner
you suggest, you run into currents of delusion that are
already flowing in a certain direction, that simply
do not wish to be altered.

so one technique is to 'catch a ride' on such a current,
with just a tiny modificiaton as you suggest.

There are 'self-defense mechanisms' present in
'the system' that prevent new code from being
uploaded.

Call it entropy and intertia if you wish.

a reply to: KellyPrettyBear

Very good response Kelly and one that deserves a longer more thought out response from myself than i can muster while at work. Stay tuned.

a reply to: BASSPLYR

Excellent. Also include how such devices can be launched
from submarines.

originally posted by: BASSPLYR
a reply to: PorteurDeMort

Before i head off to work and cant reply for a few hours i wanted to take the time to thank you for the pic you posted.

Thanks man. I've had these for 2.5 years and never made a thread because I didn't feel like dealing with the skeptics. I know what I saw and even MUFON couldn't explain it after a lengthy investigation. I know the pics aren't the best but it happened so fast I'm glad I was even able to get any pics.

It’s true, there is a horrible stigma about ufos/UAPs etc... some people cant accept any other explanation, in their ignorance, than they must be proof of aliens. Perhaps in the future alternate explanations will be more palatable but for many in this community they visibly seeth whenever anything but aliens is discussed.

a reply to: neoholographic

originally posted by: BASSPLYR
a reply to: KellyPrettyBear

Very good response Kelly and one that deserves a longer more thought out response from myself than i can muster while at work. Stay tuned.

I love it when ignorance is dispelled. Mine included.

When you get time, your opinion as an aircraft forum top poster would be very welcome.
I'd love to hear your analysis.

a reply to: KellyPrettyBear

Sorry its been a busy week and ats isnt even on my top 20 list of things to do. But since you feel so slighted, may i ask why you are pushing the narrative that these things are "launched" from submarines. Theyre not launched period. Yes submarines can "host" such an asset but they are far from the only ones. Far from it.

Besides, my initial response was to address the body of your post to me which i thought brought up a few interesting ideas outside navy shenanigans.

a reply to: BASSPLYR

I'm not 'pushing'. I just appreciate intelligent conversation.

Sometimes months go by, where I don't learn anyting truly
outside of my wheelhouse on these topics..

my asking you, was simply showing respect and looking forward
to what you might have to say.

And I never intimated that the devices in question would be
primarily released from submarines.. but that would also
close a hole in some narratives is wy I mentioned it.

I AM interested in electronic countermeasures and NEMESIS
systems in general...

As for time.. I hear you brother..

My writing partner and I are preparing a document for
an international conference at the end of the month,

and that's just my 'hobby' not my day job.

Kev