Study: 5G causes Microwave Syndrome.

originally posted by: AaarghZombies
a reply to: rickymouse

You do not have to directly change DNA to cause changes, all you have to do is alter gene expression with the frequency.

The science on this is well known, it's been known for decades. The frequencies simply aren't high enough. 5G uses non-ionizing radiation, it doesn't interact with DNA and it doesn't interact with the enzymes in your body.

Here is some evidence to back my claims.

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov...#:~:text=From%20currently%20available%20studies%20it%20is%20clear%20that,and%20produces%20genotoxicity%2C%20g enomic%20instability%20and%20oxidative%20stress.

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov...

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov...

www.geopathfinder.com...

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov...

Now, these articles are not articles written by conspiracy theorists....they are scientific evidence by legit research institutes.

Who funded the research you are reading? Cell phone companies?

I usually only read scientific articles, not crap put out by people who profit by deceiving people into believing something that is not real.

How much effect does this have on our immune system and our thinking? Results vary from research article to research article....but not one legitimate research article I read states that long term exposure is harmless...not even the ones put out by the companies that profit by the research, they just downplay the effects and con people to make false ideas that this is completely safe... People are easy to deceive, most people do not realize they can be tricked into believing in a lie.

originally posted by: nugget1

originally posted by: AaarghZombies

originally posted by: nugget1
a reply to: Sander1976
The human body is only capable of so many chemical and environmental assaults before it can no longer survive. We're getting to a tipping point where only the most hardy of our species will be forging ahead to the future; let's hope it's not the politicians and world leaders that are allowing/creating the perfect storm.

What you're doing is the equivalent of saying that if you stand out in the rain for enough time you'll eventually drown.

And if you throw in hail, high winds, maybe a tornado and 7 point quake your chances of death just rose exponentially.

This a really good paper.

Several studies have reported that exposure to EMF results in oxidative stress in many tissues of the body. Exposure to EMF is known to increase free radical concentrations and traceability and can affect the radical couple recombination.

[www.sciencedirect.com...]

That piece of the article from sciencedirect kind of says what I said in a post, except I said inflammation instead of oxidative stress which is what oxidative stress creates in the body.

originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed
Um, yeah we are talking about 5G but not the protocol moniker, that's on you.

You mean the other moniker made up to make it seem like it is all about high frequency waves, even if they are the same waves used by existing protocols?
What Is the 5G Spectrum? Definition

The frequency bands for 5G networks come in two sets. Frequency range 1 (FR1) is from 450 MHz to 6 GHz, which includes the LTE frequency range. Frequency range 2 (FR2) is from 24.25 GHz to 52.6 GHz. The sub-6 GHz range is the name for FR1 and the mmWave spectrum is the name for FR2.

Meanwhile 802.11ad is in the 57 to 71 GHz and used for things like WirelessHD and WiGig.

...the OP isn't about that. It IS about the "waves". Read the thread title.

Again, that is the point, even in places where the same "waves" are being used, 5G is the catch all to make it seem like it automatically means "scary" EHF.

5gisnietoke.nl...

bioinitiative.org...

www.thelancet.com...(18)30221-3/fulltext

www.blckbx.tv...

www.youtube.com...

a reply to: rickymouse

Who funded the research you are reading? Cell phone companies?

Because of course the government is more trustworthy?

originally posted by: AaarghZombies
a reply to: rickymouse

Who funded the research you are reading? Cell phone companies?

Because of course the government is more trustworthy?

NIH research and conclusions on something like this is reputable. I do see the NIH recently structuring the creation of evidence to make vaccines appear to be safer and more effective than they are though...because the people at the top of these agencies got highly involved in promoting fear and vaccines and they will not allow evidence to be considered as real that shows they were wrong.

If you want to believe that these cell towers and phones are perfectly safe...go for it, but saying to others that they are not a problem to anyone is misinformation. Makes me wonder if you work for one of these telecommunication companies when you argue this matter. Our bodies can take limited amounts of this stuff, in fact, the phones instructions say that you have to keep the phone at least a half inch away from your head....but it is not only the phones that emit signals, we are surrounded by unnatural frequencies. You need to look at the whole picture, not just one tiny part.

Did you even read the links I posted, I am sure I can supply another fifty research articles that say the same thing. But that would be a waste of time since you don't accept evidence that goes against your desired beliefs...you are doing a poor job of using ad hominum tactics. I know people who are much better than you are at this.

Yes, actually. More at night versus daytime. It sounds like it's coming in cycles and has changed in pattern after a small break in transmission. Been hearing it since they put up a new tower a few months back about 3/4 of a mile away. On a separate note, my dog has been staring at my cell phone everytime he walks by it. Was going to ask everyone if they had same circumstances but I can' t make new posts yet.
a reply to: Wide-Eyes

originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed
Huh? Anything that "radiates" or emits frequencies of any kind is emitting radiation. An AM-FM station transmits "radiation" to your radio receiver.

It doesn't need to be neutron radiation from plutonium to be called and referred to as radiation. There is definitely 5G radiation. 5G wouldn't even work unless there was.

What I meant is that using the expression "5G radiation" is not an accurate way of describing it when talking about possible negative effects on humans, as it would be like saying that Sun light has a negative effect on humans.

Both have negative effects that depend on strength and frequency, and considering that 5G doesn't need all the frequencies to work, knowing which ones are (or have potential to be) more harmful would be better than just saying that "5G radiation" is bad.

originally posted by: rickymouse

originally posted by: nugget1

originally posted by: AaarghZombies

originally posted by: nugget1
a reply to: Sander1976
The human body is only capable of so many chemical and environmental assaults before it can no longer survive. We're getting to a tipping point where only the most hardy of our species will be forging ahead to the future; let's hope it's not the politicians and world leaders that are allowing/creating the perfect storm.

What you're doing is the equivalent of saying that if you stand out in the rain for enough time you'll eventually drown.

And if you throw in hail, high winds, maybe a tornado and 7 point quake your chances of death just rose exponentially.

This a really good paper.

Several studies have reported that exposure to EMF results in oxidative stress in many tissues of the body. Exposure to EMF is known to increase free radical concentrations and traceability and can affect the radical couple recombination.

[www.sciencedirect.com...]

That piece of the article from sciencedirect kind of says what I said in a post, except I said inflammation instead of oxidative stress which is what oxidative stress creates in the body.

That's why I posted it. I know better than to think you don't know what you're talking about; the others will learn soon enough. lol

A man is going to be executed and has cremation as his request at his last supper he ordered all the unpopped popcorn he could eat; when asked why he said if the electrocutioner isn't surprised by the popcorn then the crematorium certainly will be.

The typical standard radio station gives off between 30Hz and 300GHz for a 60 mile coverage... so 5GHz being a constant when it's been way over that within 60 miles of a radio tower is not really a big deal.

I think people have been looking into the cell phone constantly upside one's head studies and getting them confused with broadcast GHz.

I have a fabric that's coated with a gold like foil substance that feels great when worn sort of like a bandana whether it is due to the softness of the fabric or the break of broadcast waves or a combination of both? I don't know... I originally bought it as an upholstery fabric and out of boredom wore some remnant like a bandana hat one day. What I do know is people do make and sell radio wave RF blocking hats of various sorts.

There have been you'll pry it from my cold dead skull tin foil hatters separate from the mad hatters(willfully ingesting mercury) since the 1950's though(likely a mom saying lets use something more spiffy and futuristic looking than newspaper) and then noticing a behavioral change in the child or children that use the foil instead of paper as a hat) so nothing really new as RF on the metaphysical front since then other than ghost hunters saying leaks of RF from wiring etc can become or be a cause of hauntings but in the form of hallucinations. Of course, some people would likely welcome such a thing as a cause even knowing the source just to see some paranormal like perhaps it isn't just a hallucination but a gateway like rain is said to be.

Obviously 5G is a horrible idea. Already proven a military weapon, detrimental to all organisms, and connected with coronavirus. The world order will proceed as they choose, defiant to all the resistance, ignoring all reports of their wrongs, precisely as they have during the pandemic. 5G is part of their big plan and it will be used to attack and disable civilization.